Multi-Source Partial Discharge Pattern Recognition Algorithm Based on DCGAN-YOLOv5

This study aims to overcome the complication that deep learning-based pattern recognition in partial discharge (PD) diagnosis of gas-insulated switchgear (GIS) can only identify single-source partial discharge but not multi-source partial discharge. Specifically, a GIS multi-source partial discharge...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on power delivery Jg. 40; H. 6; S. 2983 - 2992
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Min, Jiang, Wei, Shen, Daoyi, Luo, Yingting, Yang, Junjie
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: New York IEEE 01.12.2025
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0885-8977, 1937-4208
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aims to overcome the complication that deep learning-based pattern recognition in partial discharge (PD) diagnosis of gas-insulated switchgear (GIS) can only identify single-source partial discharge but not multi-source partial discharge. Specifically, a GIS multi-source partial discharge detection algorithm based on Deep Convolution Generative Adversarial Networks and You Only Look Once (DCGAN-YOLOv5) is proposed. First, the Phase Resolved Partial Discharge (PRPD) features of multi-source PD are analyzed, a GIS experiment platform is established, and four typical PD defects are simulated. Besides, sample data are collected, and the DCGAN network is used for sample expansion. Then, a YOLOv5 network model is designed, and a spatial and channel attention mechanism is added to the feature extraction network with a positive sample equilibrium strategy. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is verified using laboratory data and field data collected from a 220 kV substation. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can effectively detect the multi-source PD features in PRPD patterns under complex noise and thus successfully identify the types of multi-source PD. The mean Average Precision (mAP) can reach 98.4%. The precision of single-source PD and multi-source PD can reach 95.2% and 89.3%, when testing with field data.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0885-8977
1937-4208
DOI:10.1109/TPWRD.2022.3222317