Landslide Susceptibility Assessment via Imbalanced Data Augmentation with Tabular Variational Autoencoder and Quality–Diversity Post-Selection

Landslides are among the most common geological hazards in mountainous regions, posing significant threats to resident safety and infrastructure stability. Due to the complexity of terrain and the difficulty of field surveys, landslide samples in these areas often suffer from class imbalance, which...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Applied sciences Ročník 15; číslo 22; s. 11965
Hlavní autori: Xu, Zhengyang, Wang, Shitai, Yin, Min, Zhang, Xiaoyu, Lu, Zengyang, Yu, Songchao, Huang, Junjun
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Basel MDPI AG 01.11.2025
Predmet:
Accuracy
Algorithms
China
class imbalance
data augmentation
Datasets
Disasters
Earthquakes
Emergency communications systems
Emergency preparedness
Geology
Hydrology
landslide susceptibility
Landslides
Landslides & mudslides
Lithology
Precipitation
Puerto Rico
quality–diversity
Rain and rainfall
Risk assessment
Risk management
Surveys
Tabular Variational Autoencoder
Topography
Variables
Vegetation
Puerto Rico
China
ISSN:2076-3417, 2076-3417
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Landslides are among the most common geological hazards in mountainous regions, posing significant threats to resident safety and infrastructure stability. Due to the complexity of terrain and the difficulty of field surveys, landslide samples in these areas often suffer from class imbalance, which undermines the accuracy of susceptibility models. To address this issue, this study constructed a multi-factor landslide database and employed a Tabular Variational Autoencoder (TVAE) to generate synthetic samples. A Quality–Diversity (QD) screening strategy was further integrated to enhance the representativeness and diversity of the augmented data. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed TVAE–QD method improves model performance, with generated samples showing distributions closer to real data. Compared with the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and unfiltered TVAE, the TVAE–QD method achieved higher predictive accuracy and exhibited greater robustness under progressive data augmentation. In the Random Forest (RF) model, the TVAE–QD achieved its best performance at a scale of 350, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.923 and a Precision–Recall AUC (PR–AUC) of 0.907, outperforming TVAE and SMOTE. In the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model, the AUC peaked at 0.911 at a scale of 450, while the PR–AUC reached its maximum of 0.896 at a scale of 200. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis confirmed that data augmentation preserved interpretability: dominant factors such as elevation, rainfall, and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) remained stable, with only minor adjustments among secondary variables. Overall, the TVAE–QD framework effectively mitigates class imbalance and offers a promising technical solution for landslide risk assessment in mountainous regions.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app152211965