Clashing Statutes: Reconciling Ethiopia’s Automatic Stay under the Revised Commercial Code with Bank Foreclosure Rights

In modern commercial law, tensions frequently arise when two pivotal regimes, bankruptcy law and foreclosure law, collide. Bankruptcy statutes often facilitate an automatic stay, a legal mechanism intended to safeguard a debtor’s estate and enable the orderly resolution of insolvency. Foreclosure la...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mizan law review Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 255 - 296
Main Author: Mesfin Beyene
Format: Journal Article
Language:Amharic
English
Published: St. Mary's University, Addis Ababa 30.09.2025
Subjects:
Bankruptcy, Ethiopia, Automatic Stay, Foreclosure, Commercial Code, Creditor Rights, Debtor Protections
ISSN:1998-9881, 2309-902X
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract In modern commercial law, tensions frequently arise when two pivotal regimes, bankruptcy law and foreclosure law, collide. Bankruptcy statutes often facilitate an automatic stay, a legal mechanism intended to safeguard a debtor’s estate and enable the orderly resolution of insolvency. Foreclosure law, in contrast, prioritizes the rights of secured creditors to repossess or sell pledged collateral following a borrower’s default. In Ethiopia, this conflict needs due attention. The 2021 revision of the Commercial Code introduced a broad automatic stay, inspired by international best practices, that grants significant breathing space to debtors. However, Proclamation No. 97/1998 remains in force, empowering banks to foreclose without judicial intervention. As a result, these parallel legal frameworks sometimes stand in direct opposition. This article presents an extensive analysis of Ethiopia’s automatic stay and bank foreclosure rights, illuminating their socio-economic impact, theoretical underpinnings, and comparative lessons drawn from other jurisdictions. The aim is to highlight legal “grey areas,” explore contradictory mandates for debtors and creditors, and propose reforms that could harmonize Ethiopia’s legal system. Ultimately, this article underlines the importance of balancing strong creditor remedies with genuine opportunities for debtor rehabilitation, a balance that is vital for sustaining healthy credit markets and broader economic well-being.
AbstractList In modern commercial law, tensions frequently arise when two pivotal regimes, bankruptcy law and foreclosure law, collide. Bankruptcy statutes often facilitate an automatic stay, a legal mechanism intended to safeguard a debtor’s estate and enable the orderly resolution of insolvency. Foreclosure law, in contrast, prioritizes the rights of secured creditors to repossess or sell pledged collateral following a borrower’s default. In Ethiopia, this conflict needs due attention. The 2021 revision of the Commercial Code introduced a broad automatic stay, inspired by international best practices, that grants significant breathing space to debtors. However, Proclamation No. 97/1998 remains in force, empowering banks to foreclose without judicial intervention. As a result, these parallel legal frameworks sometimes stand in direct opposition. This article presents an extensive analysis of Ethiopia’s automatic stay and bank foreclosure rights, illuminating their socio-economic impact, theoretical underpinnings, and comparative lessons drawn from other jurisdictions. The aim is to highlight legal “grey areas,” explore contradictory mandates for debtors and creditors, and propose reforms that could harmonize Ethiopia’s legal system. Ultimately, this article underlines the importance of balancing strong creditor remedies with genuine opportunities for debtor rehabilitation, a balance that is vital for sustaining healthy credit markets and broader economic well-being.
Author Mesfin Beyene
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  surname: Mesfin Beyene
  fullname: Mesfin Beyene
BookMark eNo9kc9q3DAQxkVJINskp7yA7sUbjSX_md62SzZZCBSaFHoTkiyv1dpWkLQJe-tr9PXyJLGzoXOZ4eObHzN8n8nJ6EdLyBWwpeAgroc-LJ8BXb7kn8gi5wwzZPmvE7IAxDrDuoYzchmj0ywvsQJe1wtyWPcqdm7c0Yek0j7Z-JX-sMaPxvWzepM655-cev37L9LVPvlBJWdm84Hux8YGmjo7bTy7aBu69sNgg3Gqn8bG0heXOvpNjX_oxgdreh_3YXK7XZfiBTltVR_t5Uc_Jz83N4_ru-z---12vbrPDHDkmTYNKwGK6dxcVKUyrQAEbIArrFqt27wtAAsFLZammtxc6MIUIFhjteYVPyfbI7fx6rd8Cm5Q4SC9cvJd8GEnVZh-6q1Uc5UlR2S1YNBo1FCY3Bohcg44s74cWSb4GINt__OAyTkEOYUg30OQnL8Bp_Z_TQ
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.4314/mlr.v19i2.3
DatabaseName CrossRef
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Law
EISSN 2309-902X
EndPage 296
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_aaaaa6639908401db9b15c2ec4423197
10_4314_mlr_v19i2_3
GroupedDBID -OY
.4L
1XV
4JU
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ADBBV
ADUOI
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ANHLU
BCNDV
CITATION
GCT
GROUPED_DOAJ
HCSNT
HOCAJ
KQ8
KWQ
OK1
QN5
RHO
RNS
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1393-bcd061151382476acf41919d13a97fbbf2f5195a1f96c7bcd34b5c5140debb373
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1998-9881
IngestDate Mon Nov 24 19:21:03 EST 2025
Wed Oct 29 21:26:50 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language Amharic
English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1393-bcd061151382476acf41919d13a97fbbf2f5195a1f96c7bcd34b5c5140debb373
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/aaaaa6639908401db9b15c2ec4423197
PageCount 42
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_aaaaa6639908401db9b15c2ec4423197
crossref_primary_10_4314_mlr_v19i2_3
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-09-30
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-09-30
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-09-30
  day: 30
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Mizan law review
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher St. Mary's University, Addis Ababa
Publisher_xml – name: St. Mary's University, Addis Ababa
SSID ssib026971388
ssj0000392928
Score 2.3053997
Snippet In modern commercial law, tensions frequently arise when two pivotal regimes, bankruptcy law and foreclosure law, collide. Bankruptcy statutes often facilitate...
SourceID doaj
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Index Database
StartPage 255
SubjectTerms Bankruptcy, Ethiopia, Automatic Stay, Foreclosure, Commercial Code, Creditor Rights, Debtor Protections
Title Clashing Statutes: Reconciling Ethiopia’s Automatic Stay under the Revised Commercial Code with Bank Foreclosure Rights
URI https://doaj.org/article/aaaaa6639908401db9b15c2ec4423197
Volume 19
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2309-902X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000392928
  issn: 1998-9881
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20070101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV27TsMwFLWgYmBBPEV5yUPXtHXsJjZbW1ExVBVCgLpFfiRSRZtUfaFu_Aa_x5dwr1NQmVjoGFlJdG3lnuP6nENITcGqkUrzIJOMB4JHaaBlzIOUhdq1JItCr6946ceDgRwO1cNW1BeeCSvtgcvCNTT-IuyjTeAizBllWMuGqRUABJjyOnJAPVtkClZSGCkgXxsjLv9NRhjgg1a9pkxJyUqxHvRP0ZiMZ_UVU6Owzn-1py0Xf99ueofkYIMTabt8vyOyoyfHZLev307IGoMsceOIIlJcAla8pcgicztCbTnFI-zFdKQ_3z_mtL1cFN6VFQevKUrGZhRAH8U_Beapo6gQwdQleFi3cCnFjVna0fkrxdROOy5wC5E-Ioefn5Ln3t1T9z7YJCgEFpAdD4x10K-hqXMZijjSNhPAz5RjXKs4MyYLM3SX0SxTkY1hNBemZQFDNV1qDI_5GankRZ6eEyq4ljoSNo6dAAjFTcYccE-pW7Zpmjqrktp34ZJpaZSRAMHA-iZQ38TXN-FV0sGi_gxBd2t_AeY82cx58tecX_zHTS7JfohZvv7sxxWpLGbL9Jrs2dViNJ_d-OX0BTQBzY0
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clashing+Statutes%3A+Reconciling+Ethiopia%E2%80%99s+Automatic+Stay+under+the+Revised+Commercial+Code+with+Bank+Foreclosure+Rights&rft.jtitle=Mizan+law+review&rft.au=Mesfin+Beyene&rft.date=2025-09-30&rft.issn=1998-9881&rft.eissn=2309-902X&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=296&rft_id=info:doi/10.4314%2Fmlr.v19i2.3&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_4314_mlr_v19i2_3
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1998-9881&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1998-9881&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1998-9881&client=summon