Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme

ObjectiveAlthough a split regimen of bowel preparation has been associated with higher levels of bowel cleansing, it is still uncertain whether it has a favourable effect on the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The present study was aimed at evaluating whether a split regimen was superior to the tradit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gut Vol. 66; no. 2; pp. 270 - 277
Main Authors: Radaelli, F, Paggi, S, Hassan, C, Senore, C, Fasoli, R, Anderloni, A, Buffoli, F, Savarese, M F, Spinzi, G, Rex, D K, Repici, A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.02.2017
Subjects:
ISSN:0017-5749, 1468-3288, 1468-3288
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ObjectiveAlthough a split regimen of bowel preparation has been associated with higher levels of bowel cleansing, it is still uncertain whether it has a favourable effect on the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The present study was aimed at evaluating whether a split regimen was superior to the traditional ‘full-dose, day-before’ regimen in terms of ADR.DesignIn a multicentre, randomised, endoscopist-blinded study, 50–69-year-old subjects undergoing first colonoscopy after positive-faecal immunochemical test within an organised colorectal cancer organised screening programmes were 1:1 randomised to receive low-volume 2-L polyethylene glycol (PEG)-ascorbate solution in a ‘split-dose’ (Split-Dose Group, SDG) or ‘day-before’ regimen (Day-Before Group, DBG). The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with at least one adenoma. Secondary endpoints were the detection rates of advanced adenomas and serrated lesions at per-patient analysis and the total number of lesions.Results690 subjects were included in the study. At per-patient analysis, the proportion of subjects with at least one adenoma was significantly higher in the SDG than in the DBG (183/345, 53.0% vs 141/345, 40.9%, relative risk (RR) 1.22, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.46); corresponding figures for advanced adenomas were 26.4% (91/345) versus 20.0% (69/345, RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.73). At per-polyp analysis, the total numbers of both adenomas and advanced adenomas per subject were significantly higher in the SDG (1.15 vs 0.8, p <0.001; 0.36 vs 0.22, p<0.001).ConclusionsIn an organised screening setting, the adoption of a split regimen resulted into a higher detection rate of clinically relevant neoplastic lesions, thus improving the effectiveness of colonoscopy. Based on such evidence, the adoption of a split regimen for colonoscopy should be strongly recommended.Clinical trial registration numberNCT02178033.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
1468-3288
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310685