Ballistic Fractures During The 2003 Gulf Conflict – Early Prognosis And High Complication Rate

Background Ballistic fractures are devastating injuries often necessitating extensive reconstructive surgery or amputation, particularly if associated with high-energy transfer wounds. Infective complications are common, particularly in the austere environment encountered in war. We present the mana...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ military health Vol. 152; no. 2; pp. 96 - 101
Main Authors: Hinsley, D E, Phillips, SL, Clasper, J C
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.06.2006
Subjects:
ISSN:0035-8665, 2633-3767, 2052-0468, 2633-3775
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Background Ballistic fractures are devastating injuries often necessitating extensive reconstructive surgery or amputation, particularly if associated with high-energy transfer wounds. Infective complications are common, particularly in the austere environment encountered in war. We present the management and early outcome of these injuries with reference to the mechanism of injury and bony injury. Method Data on ballistic fractures was collected prospectively during the ‘warfighting’ phase of the 2003 Gulf Conflict, between 19th March and 20th May. Fractures were scored using the Red Cross Fracture classification and early outcome analysed. Results Thirty-nine patients, with 50 ballistic fractures, were treated by British military surgeons. Patients were predominantly Iraqi (90%) and 50 per cent of ballistic fractures were caused by bullets. Seventeen upper limb fractures and 33 lower limb fractures were sustained. There were seven traumatic amputations, and a further 2 limbs were amputated primarily. Methods of primary stabilisation for the remaining 41 fractures were: external fixation (22%), POP (14.5%), K-wires (14.5%) traction (10%), and no stabilisation (39%). Seven individuals were evacuated early after primary surgery, hence 43 ballistic fractures were available for follow-up. 13/43 (30%) of wounds became infected, 5/43 (11.5%) were deep infections necessitating surgical drainage. There were 4 late amputations (9.5%), 3 of which had initially been managed by external fixation. Infection occurred significantly more often in gunshot fractures (10/21, 48%), wounds closed primarily – against the principles of war surgery (4/5, 80%) and intra-articular fractures (3/3, 100%) (p=0.022, 0.024 and 0.023 respectively). Differing methods of stabilisation had no bearing on the rate of postoperative infection. Conclusion Ballistic fractures remain a challenge for trauma surgeons in times of war and still have a poor prognosis. Further work is required to determine the optimal treatment of these injuries during conflicts. In addition, there still seems to be a continued need to re-learn the principles of war surgery in order to minimise complications and optimise functional recovery.
AbstractList Background Ballistic fractures are devastating injuries often necessitating extensive reconstructive surgery or amputation, particularly if associated with high-energy transfer wounds. Infective complications are common, particularly in the austere environment encountered in war. We present the management and early outcome of these injuries with reference to the mechanism of injury and bony injury. Method Data on ballistic fractures was collected prospectively during the 'warfighting' phase of the 2003 Gulf Conflict, between 19th March and 20th May. Fractures were scored using the Red Cross Fracture classification and early outcome analysed. Results Thirty-nine patients, with 50 ballistic fractures, were treated by British military surgeons. Patients were predominantly Iraqi (90%) and 50 per cent of ballistic fractures were caused by bullets. Seventeen upper limb fractures and 33 lower limb fractures were sustained. There were seven traumatic amputations, and a further 2 limbs were amputated primarily. Methods of primary stabilisation for the remaining 41 fractures were: external fixation (22%), POP (14.5%), K-wires (14.5%) traction (10%), and no stabilisation (39%). Seven individuals were evacuated early after primary surgery, hence 43 ballistic fractures were available for follow-up. 13/43 (30%) of wounds became infected, 5/43 (11.5%) were deep infections necessitating surgical drainage. There were 4 late amputations (9.5%), 3 of which had initially been managed by external fixation. Infection occurred significantly more often in gunshot fractures (10/21, 48%), wounds closed primarily - against the principles of war surgery (4/5, 80%) and intra-articular fractures (3/3, 100%) (p=0.022, 0.024 and 0.023 respectively). Differing methods of stabilisation had no bearing on the rate of postoperative infection. Conclusion Ballistic fractures remain a challenge for trauma surgeons in times of war and still have a poor prognosis. Further work is required to determine the optimal treatment of these injuries during conflicts. In addition, there still seems to be a continued need to re-learn the principles of war surgery in order to minimise complications and optimise functional recovery.
Ballistic fractures are devastating injuries often necessitating extensive reconstructive surgery or amputation, particularly if associated with high-energy transfer wounds. Infective complications are common, particularly in the austere environment encountered in war. We present the management and early outcome of these injuries with reference to the mechanism of injury and bony injury.BACKGROUNDBallistic fractures are devastating injuries often necessitating extensive reconstructive surgery or amputation, particularly if associated with high-energy transfer wounds. Infective complications are common, particularly in the austere environment encountered in war. We present the management and early outcome of these injuries with reference to the mechanism of injury and bony injury.Data on ballistic fractures was collected prospectively during the 'war-fighting' phase of the 2003 Gulf Conflict, between 19th March and 20th May. Fractures were scored using the Red Cross Fracture classification and early outcome analysed.METHODData on ballistic fractures was collected prospectively during the 'war-fighting' phase of the 2003 Gulf Conflict, between 19th March and 20th May. Fractures were scored using the Red Cross Fracture classification and early outcome analysed.Thirty-nine patients, with 50 ballistic fractures, were treated by British military surgeons. Patients were predominantly Iraqi (90%) and 50 per cent of ballistic fractures were caused by bullets. Seventeen upper limb fractures and 33 lower limb fractures were sustained. There were seven traumatic amputations, and a further 2 limbs were amputated primarily. Methods of primary stabilisation for the remaining 41 fractures were: external fixation (22%), POP (14.5%), K-wires (14.5%) traction (10%), and no stabilisation (39%). Seven individuals were evacuated early after primary surgery, hence 43 ballistic fractures were available for follow-up. 13/43 (30%) of wounds became infected, 5/43 (11.5%) were deep infections necessitating surgical drainage. There were 4 late amputations (9.5%), 3 of which had initially been managed by external fixation. Infection occurred significantly more often in gunshot fractures (10/21, 48%), wounds closed primarily against the principles of war surgery (415, 80%) and intra-articular fractures (3/3, 100%) (p=0.022, 0.024 and 0.023 respectively). Differing methods of stabilisation had no bearing on the rate of postoperative infection.RESULTSThirty-nine patients, with 50 ballistic fractures, were treated by British military surgeons. Patients were predominantly Iraqi (90%) and 50 per cent of ballistic fractures were caused by bullets. Seventeen upper limb fractures and 33 lower limb fractures were sustained. There were seven traumatic amputations, and a further 2 limbs were amputated primarily. Methods of primary stabilisation for the remaining 41 fractures were: external fixation (22%), POP (14.5%), K-wires (14.5%) traction (10%), and no stabilisation (39%). Seven individuals were evacuated early after primary surgery, hence 43 ballistic fractures were available for follow-up. 13/43 (30%) of wounds became infected, 5/43 (11.5%) were deep infections necessitating surgical drainage. There were 4 late amputations (9.5%), 3 of which had initially been managed by external fixation. Infection occurred significantly more often in gunshot fractures (10/21, 48%), wounds closed primarily against the principles of war surgery (415, 80%) and intra-articular fractures (3/3, 100%) (p=0.022, 0.024 and 0.023 respectively). Differing methods of stabilisation had no bearing on the rate of postoperative infection.Ballistic fractures remain a challenge for trauma surgeons in times of war and still have a poor prognosis. Further work is required to determine the optimal treatment of these injuries during conflicts. In addition, there still seems to be a continued need to re-learn the principles of war surgery in order to minimise complications and optimise functional recovery.CONCLUSIONBallistic fractures remain a challenge for trauma surgeons in times of war and still have a poor prognosis. Further work is required to determine the optimal treatment of these injuries during conflicts. In addition, there still seems to be a continued need to re-learn the principles of war surgery in order to minimise complications and optimise functional recovery.
Ballistic fractures are devastating injuries often necessitating extensive reconstructive surgery or amputation, particularly if associated with high-energy transfer wounds. Infective complications are common, particularly in the austere environment encountered in war. We present the management and early outcome of these injuries with reference to the mechanism of injury and bony injury. Data on ballistic fractures was collected prospectively during the 'war-fighting' phase of the 2003 Gulf Conflict, between 19th March and 20th May. Fractures were scored using the Red Cross Fracture classification and early outcome analysed. Thirty-nine patients, with 50 ballistic fractures, were treated by British military surgeons. Patients were predominantly Iraqi (90%) and 50 per cent of ballistic fractures were caused by bullets. Seventeen upper limb fractures and 33 lower limb fractures were sustained. There were seven traumatic amputations, and a further 2 limbs were amputated primarily. Methods of primary stabilisation for the remaining 41 fractures were: external fixation (22%), POP (14.5%), K-wires (14.5%) traction (10%), and no stabilisation (39%). Seven individuals were evacuated early after primary surgery, hence 43 ballistic fractures were available for follow-up. 13/43 (30%) of wounds became infected, 5/43 (11.5%) were deep infections necessitating surgical drainage. There were 4 late amputations (9.5%), 3 of which had initially been managed by external fixation. Infection occurred significantly more often in gunshot fractures (10/21, 48%), wounds closed primarily against the principles of war surgery (415, 80%) and intra-articular fractures (3/3, 100%) (p=0.022, 0.024 and 0.023 respectively). Differing methods of stabilisation had no bearing on the rate of postoperative infection. Ballistic fractures remain a challenge for trauma surgeons in times of war and still have a poor prognosis. Further work is required to determine the optimal treatment of these injuries during conflicts. In addition, there still seems to be a continued need to re-learn the principles of war surgery in order to minimise complications and optimise functional recovery.
Author Hinsley, D E
Phillips, SL
Clasper, J C
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: D E
  surname: Hinsley
  fullname: Hinsley, D E
  email: EHinsley@aol.com
  organization: Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford EHinsley@aol.com
– sequence: 2
  givenname: SL
  surname: Phillips
  fullname: Phillips, SL
  email: EHinsley@aol.com
  organization: Kings College Hospital London
– sequence: 3
  givenname: J C
  surname: Clasper
  fullname: Clasper, J C
  email: EHinsley@aol.com
  organization: Frimley Park Hospital Frimley, Surrey
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17175773$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkUtrlDEUhoNU7Fi7dicBwYXw2Vwml1nW6U0oVKSuY5JJphnyJWOSb9Fd_4P_0F9i2qkuClI4cE7geV9Ozvsa7KWcHABvMfqEMeVHm6JHO2BGBtSLvwAzgu4fcy73wAwhygbJOdsHh7UGgzCdYyEkeQX2scCCCUFn4MdnHWOoLVh4VrRtU3EVnkwlpDW8vnGQdBt4PkUPlzn5GGyDv-9-wVNd4i38WvI65RoqPE4reBHWN50at53SLeQEv-nm3oCXXsfqDh_7Afh-dnq9vBgur86_LI8vB0MEbQNFdk4sMVRzTqnz1gst_Zx6yS3Gps8cWSpXZuW1E0xizp3RZIGJN0wzQQ_Ah53vtuSfk6tNjaFaF6NOLk9VcUkYpXLRwfdPwE2eSuq7qX4evFhIylGn3j1SkxndSm1LGHW5VX8v1wG2A2zJtRbnlQ3t4dut6BAVRuo-JPUQkuohKdSLd93RE90_6_8qPu4UZtw8C_8BCtOh4g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_12968_bjon_2010_19_13_48860
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_ppat_1007056
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_019_04387_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00590_009_0571_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_019_04317_x
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjmilitary_2019_001375
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2009_02_075
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mporth_2023_05_002
crossref_primary_10_1097_BOT_0000000000002317
crossref_primary_10_1186_1746_160X_7_18
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2018_10_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2011_06_028
crossref_primary_10_1097_TA_0b013e318227ac5f
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2020_08_028
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijid_2015_10_016
crossref_primary_10_1093_jscr_rjz149
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiomech_2025_106500
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12178_015_9284_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hansur_2022_11_003
crossref_primary_10_1097_TA_0b013e3181e4b33d
Cites_doi 10.1308/003588404322827491
10.1002/bjs.1800780921
10.1093/milmed/157.10.552
10.1097/00005373-199708000-00012
10.1097/00005373-199303000-00009
10.1093/milmed/162.12.808
10.1016/j.injury.2004.10.023
10.1302/0301-620X.78B5.0780706
10.1017/S0195941700015241
10.1007/BF02066991
10.1016/S0020-1383(98)80174-5
10.1016/0020-1383(94)90063-9
10.1002/bjs.4911
10.1097/00005373-199603001-00028
10.2106/00004623-200101000-00002
10.1097/00005373-199603001-00044
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
– notice: Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
BTHHO
CCPQU
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
DOI 10.1136/jramc-152-02-06
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central
BMJ Journals
ProQuest One Community College
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
BMJ Journals
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Military & Naval Science
EISSN 2052-0468
2633-3775
EndPage 101
ExternalDocumentID 3978491931
17175773
10_1136_jramc_152_02_06
jramc
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
4.4
53G
7X7
AAYAA
ABCQX
ABKRM
ABWEH
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADMRH
AENEX
AHMBA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BPHCQ
BTHHO
BVXVI
C45
CXRWF
DIK
EBS
EJD
F5P
FYUFA
H13
HAJ
HZ~
L7B
M1P
O9-
OVD
PQQKQ
PROAC
RHI
RMJ
TEORI
UAP
ZGI
~02
AAJAY
AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
BENPR
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
0R~
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFFHD
AFKRA
CCPQU
HMCUK
K9.
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
PSQYO
UKHRP
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-b273t-30c42c2b3a6633efcf7a8f43f86c11ba8f60c38dbdfae758166eba2912fb5a573
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0035-8665
2633-3767
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 06:20:29 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 14:31:01 EST 2025
Sat Sep 28 07:55:41 EDT 2024
Tue Nov 18 22:11:53 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:36:45 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:29 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-b273t-30c42c2b3a6633efcf7a8f43f86c11ba8f60c38dbdfae758166eba2912fb5a573
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMID 17175773
PQID 1771998360
PQPubID 2041033
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_68253389
proquest_journals_1771998360
pubmed_primary_17175773
crossref_citationtrail_10_1136_jramc_152_02_06
crossref_primary_10_1136_jramc_152_02_06
bmj_primary_10_1136_jramc_152_02_06
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2006-Jun
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2006-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2006
  text: 2006-Jun
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMJ military health
PublicationTitleAlternate J R Army Med Corps
PublicationYear 2006
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Publisher_xml – name: BMJ Publishing Group LTD
References Rosell, P.A.E.; Clasper, J.C. (ref_27) 2005; 36
Gustilo, R.B.; Mendoza, R.M.; Williams, D.N. (ref_13) 1984
Ordog, G.J.; Sheppard, G.F.; Wasserberger, J.S. (ref_1) 1993; 34
Olson, S.A.; Finkmeier, C.G.; Moehring, H.D. (ref_17) 2001; 10
Hinsley, D.E.; Rosell, P.A.E.; Rowlands, T.K.; Clasper, J.C. (ref_2) 2005; 92
Bosse, M.J.; MacKenzie, E.J.; Kellam, J.F. (ref_18) 2001; 83
Horan, T.C.; Gaynes, R.P.; Martone, M.J.; Jarvis, W.R.; Emori, T.G. (ref_5) 1992; 13
Spalding, T.J.W.; Stewart, M.P.M.; Tulloch, D.N.; Stephens, K.M. (ref_9) 1991; 78
Tikka, S.; Bostman, O.; Martitinem, E. (ref_11); 40
P, Dellinger E.; D, Miller S.; MJ, Wertz (ref_14); 123
Maricevic, A.; Erceg, M. (ref_21) 1997; 162
Rowley, D. (ref_3) 1996
Coupland, R.M. (ref_23) 1994; 25
Trueta, J. (ref_24); 1939
Kirby, N.G. (ref_4) 1983
Rautio, J. (ref_8) 1987; 18
Hull, J.B.; Cooper, G.J. (ref_6) 1996; 40
Coupland, R.M. (ref_26) 1992; 16
Mellor, S.G.; Cooper, G.J.; Bowyer, G.W. (ref_16) 1996; 40
Rowley, D.I. (ref_22) 1996; 78
Jacob, E.; Murphy, K.P. (ref_10); 157
Georgiadis, G.M. (ref_19) 2002; 3
Pukljak, D. (ref_20) 1997; 43
Spencer, J.; Smith, A.; Woods, D. (ref_15) 2004; 86
Clasper, J.C.; Phillips, S.L. (ref_7) 2005; 151
Gustilo, R.B.; Anderson, J.T. (ref_12) 1976; 58
Nikolic, D.; Jovanovic, G.; Turkovic (ref_25) 1998; 29
References_xml – volume: 18
  issue: 238
  year: 1987
  ident: ref_8
  article-title: Paavolainen P: Delayed treatment of complicated fractures in war wounded
  publication-title: Injury
– volume: 58
  start-page: 453458
  year: 1976
  ident: ref_12
  article-title: Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
– volume: 86
  start-page: 108
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  ident: ref_15
  article-title: The effect of time delay on infection in open long-bone fractures; a 5year prospective audit from a district general hospital
  publication-title: Ann R Coll Surg Engl
  doi: 10.1308/003588404322827491
– volume: 1939
  start-page: 1452
  ident: ref_24
  article-title: Closed treatment of war fractures
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 151
  start-page: 81
  year: 2005
  ident: ref_7
  article-title: Early failure of external fixation in the management of war injuries
  publication-title: JRAMC
– volume: 78
  start-page: 1102
  year: 1991
  ident: ref_9
  article-title: Penetrating missile injuries in the Gulf War
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780921
– volume: 157
  start-page: 552
  ident: ref_10
  article-title: Erpelding JM: A retrospective analysis of open fractures sustained by US military personnel during Operation Just Cause
  publication-title: Mil Med
  doi: 10.1093/milmed/157.10.552
– volume: 43
  start-page: 275
  issue: 2
  year: 1997
  ident: ref_20
  article-title: External fixation-minimal osteosynthesis: Indications, role, and place in war surgery
  publication-title: J Trauma
  doi: 10.1097/00005373-199708000-00012
– volume: 123
  start-page: 1320
  ident: ref_14
  article-title: Risk of infection after open fracture of the arm or leg
  publication-title: Arch Surg
– volume: 10
  start-page: 285
  volume-title: Open Fractures, in Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults
  year: 2001
  ident: ref_17
– volume: 34
  start-page: 358
  issue: 3
  year: 1993
  ident: ref_1
  article-title: Infection in minor gunshot wounds
  publication-title: J Trauma
  doi: 10.1097/00005373-199303000-00009
– volume: 3
  start-page: 1681
  issue: 11
  year: 2002
  ident: ref_19
  article-title: Limb salvage versus amputation, in Oxford Textbook of Orthopaedics and Trauma
– volume: 162
  start-page: 808
  issue: 12
  year: 1997
  ident: ref_21
  article-title: War injuries to the extremities
  publication-title: Mil Med
  doi: 10.1093/milmed/162.12.808
– volume: 36
  start-page: 369
  year: 2005
  ident: ref_27
  article-title: Ballistic fractures - the limited value of existing classifications
  publication-title: Injury
  doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.10.023
– volume: 78
  start-page: 706
  year: 1996
  ident: ref_22
  article-title: The management of war wounds involving bone
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg (Br)
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.78B5.0780706
– year: 1983
  ident: ref_4
  article-title: Surgical Pocket Book
– volume: 13
  start-page: 606
  year: 1992
  ident: ref_5
  article-title: CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections
  publication-title: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1017/S0195941700015241
– volume: 40
  start-page: 212
  issue: 3
  ident: ref_11
  article-title: A retrospective analysis of 36 civilian gunshot fractures
  publication-title: J Trauma
– volume: 16
  start-page: 910
  year: 1992
  ident: ref_26
  article-title: The Red Cross classification of war wounds
  publication-title: World J Surg; scoring system
  doi: 10.1007/BF02066991
– volume: 29
  start-page: 743
  issue: 10
  year: 1998
  ident: ref_25
  article-title: Subtrochanteric missile fractures of the femur
  publication-title: Injury
  doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(98)80174-5
– start-page: 742
  year: 1984
  ident: ref_13
  article-title: Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification system of type III open fractures
  publication-title: J Trauma
– volume: 25
  start-page: 211
  issue: 4
  year: 1994
  ident: ref_23
  article-title: War wounds of bones and external fixation
  publication-title: Injury
  doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(94)90063-9
– volume: 92
  start-page: 637
  issue: 5
  year: 2005
  ident: ref_2
  article-title: Penetrating missile injuries during asymmetric warfare in the 2003 Gulf conflict
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.4911
– year: 1996
  ident: ref_3
  article-title: War wounds with fractures: a guide to surgical management
– volume: 40
  start-page: 128
  issue: 3
  year: 1996
  ident: ref_16
  article-title: Efficacy of delayed administration of benzylpenicillin in the control of infection in penetrating soft tissue injuries in war
  publication-title: J Trauma
  doi: 10.1097/00005373-199603001-00028
– volume: 83
  start-page: 3
  issue: 1
  year: 2001
  ident: ref_18
  article-title: A prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of the lower-extremity injury-severeity scores
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-200101000-00002
– volume: 40
  start-page: 198
  issue: 3
  year: 1996
  ident: ref_6
  article-title: Pattern and mechanism of traumatic amputation by explosive blast
  publication-title: J Trauma
  doi: 10.1097/00005373-199603001-00044
SSID ssib013417782
ssib057963931
ssj0068509
ssj0002268034
Score 1.7904878
Snippet Background Ballistic fractures are devastating injuries often necessitating extensive reconstructive surgery or amputation, particularly if associated with...
Ballistic fractures are devastating injuries often necessitating extensive reconstructive surgery or amputation, particularly if associated with high-energy...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
bmj
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 96
SubjectTerms Amputation, Traumatic - complications
Amputation, Traumatic - surgery
Fracture Fixation - adverse effects
Fracture Fixation - methods
Fractures, Bone - classification
Fractures, Bone - complications
Fractures, Bone - etiology
Fractures, Bone - surgery
Gulf War
Humans
Infection - complications
Military Personnel
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Surgical Wound Infection
United Kingdom
Wounds, Gunshot - complications
Wounds, Gunshot - surgery
Title Ballistic Fractures During The 2003 Gulf Conflict – Early Prognosis And High Complication Rate
URI https://jramc.bmj.com/content/152/2/96.full
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17175773
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1771998360
https://www.proquest.com/docview/68253389
Volume 152
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2052-0468
  dateEnd: 20191231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0068509
  issn: 0035-8665
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 19660101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2052-0468
  dateEnd: 20250609
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002268034
  issn: 0035-8665
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 19660101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NT9swFLcYcNhlA-2rGwNL22EXgx0ntnOaoFB2mKoKbagnLNuxJVBJWdPu79-z65ZxgB0mRVakyE6U9-z3_XsIfVYg1RsjGHEV9aTkMIBazkkZSuqCALZJCHyX3-VwqMbjepQdbl1Oq1ydiemgbqYu-siPmJSxHIwL-vXuF4ldo2J0NbfQeIa2YtvsyOdyLNc-FlAtFE2B5UJwHveSzOg-jIujm5m5dQTkV0rCjZgj9vbmoXh6ROdMsmfw8n-_ege9yFonPl6yyS7a8O0rdHViJpOE04wHsVZqAZY3Pk1lixi4B8eEMny-mATcz7UjmOAEiIxHs2lM0Lvu8HHb4Jgrgvt_5abjC9BgX6Ofg7Mf_W8kt1sgFnSYOeHUlYUrLDeghXAfXJBGhZIHJRxjFu4FdVw1tgnGg5nBhPDWFDUrgq1MJfkbtNlOW_8OYWYjzGrtCl_T0lJjKhVo5cpKeeatdD30Cf61vlsCauhkiHChE0U0UERTuEQPHa5ooV1GLI-NMyaPT_iynvDPtfdWBNN513b6nlo9dLB-DPstBlFM66eLTgswqcGsr3vo7ZIl7t8ElnElJX__9NIf0POlGyd6cvbQ5ny28B_Rtvs9v-5m-4mB06j20dbJ2XB08QcNEffX
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwELZKQYILD_FaKNQSIHEJtePEdg4IlS1Lqy6rChW0pxrbsaVW22xJdkH8KX4jYyfZwqFw6gEpiiJFmSjxvD3zDULPJVj1UnOa2Jy4JGNwArecJZnPiPUc2CYi8H0ei8lETqfFwRr62ffChLLKXidGRV3ObciRb1EhQjsY4-TN2dckTI0Ku6v9CI2WLfbdj-8QsjWv93ZgfV-k6ejd4XA36aYKJAZM9SJhxGapTQ3TYGyZ89YLLX3GvOSWUgPXnFgmS1N67cCbppw7o9OCpt7kOhcM6F5BV0GPixDsialY5XTAlZEkbmSnQDrIrujQhCjjWye1PrUJ2MtY9BswTszpyZ_m8AIfN9q60a3_7S_dRjc7rxpvt2JwB6256i46eqtns4hDjUehF2xZuwbvxLZMDNKBQ8Ecfr-ceTzsemNwgiPgMz6o56EA8bjB21WJQy0MHv5We48_god-D326lE-6j9areeUeIkxNgJEtbOoKkhmidS49yW2WS0edEXaAnsHaqrMWMETFQItxFTlAAQcoAgcfoFf92ivbIbKHwSCzix94uXrgn7Q3egZRnVZq1Dl3DNDm6jbok7BJpCs3XzaKyxQiAFkM0IOWBc_fBJF_LgR79HfSm-j67uGHsRrvTfYfoxttyipkrTbQ-qJeuifomv22OG7qp1F4MPpy2Xz4CyzJVDE
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwEB6VLUJceIjXQqGWAIlLWCdObOeAULvbharValUB6gnjOLbUapstyS6Iv8avY-xkt3AonHpAiqJIURwl_ubh8cw3AC8kWvVS8zgyGbVRyvCEbjmLUpdS4zjCJjDwfToUk4k8Ps6nG_BzVQvj0ypXOjEo6nJufIx8EAvhy8EYpwPXpUVMR-O3518j30HK77Su2mm0EDmwP77j8q15sz_CuX6ZJOO9D8P3UddhICrQbC8iRk2amKRgGg0vs844oaVLmZPcxHGB15waJsuidNqiZx1zbgud5HHiikxnguG412BToJOR9mBzd28yPVpHeNCxkTRsayc4uJdk0XELxYwPTmt9ZiK0niEF2DOeFGenfxrHSzzeYPnGt__nf3YHbnX-NtlpBeQubNjqHnze1bNZYKgmY18ltqxtQ0ahYJOg3BCfSkfeLWeODLuqGRKRQAVNpvXcpyaeNGSnKonPkiHD37LyyRH67vfh45V80gPoVfPKPgISF55gNjeJzWlaUK0z6Whm0kza2BbC9OE5zrM6b6lEVFiCMa4CGhSiQVE8eB9er3CgTMfV7luGzC5_4NX6gX-OvbUCi-r0VaMukNKH7fVt1DR--0hXdr5sFJcJrg1k3oeHLRwv3iTQCRWCPf770NtwA-GnDvcnB0_gZhvL8uGsLegt6qV9CtfNt8VJUz_rJInAl6sG4i9Qll5R
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ballistic+Fractures+During+The+2003+Gulf+Conflict+-+Early+Prognosis+And+High+Complication+Rate&rft.jtitle=BMJ+military+health&rft.au=Hinsley%2C+D+E&rft.au=Phillips%2C+SL&rft.au=Clasper%2C+J+C&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.pub=BMJ+Publishing+Group+LTD&rft.issn=2633-3767&rft.eissn=2633-3775&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=96&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136%2Fjramc-152-02-06&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=3978491931
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0035-8665&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0035-8665&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0035-8665&client=summon