Developing and Validating Clinical Questionnaires

Coinciding with the development and revision of conceptual models of psychopathology, there has been a proliferation in the number of self-report clinical questionnaires and studies evaluating their psychometric properties. Unfortunately, many clinical measures are constructed and evaluated using su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annual review of clinical psychology Jg. 17; S. 55
Hauptverfasser: Rosellini, Anthony J, Brown, Timothy A
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States 07.05.2021
Schlagworte:
factor analysis
questionnaire
psychometric validation
self-report
psychopathology
ISSN:1548-5951, 1548-5951
Online-Zugang:Weitere Angaben
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Coinciding with the development and revision of conceptual models of psychopathology, there has been a proliferation in the number of self-report clinical questionnaires and studies evaluating their psychometric properties. Unfortunately, many clinical measures are constructed and evaluated using suboptimal methods. This review provides current guidelines for the conceptualization, development, and psychometric validation of clinical questionnaires using latent variable methods. A two-stage exploratory-confirmatory framework is provided. The exploratory stage includes item selection and revision, initial structural evaluation, and preliminary tests of concurrent validity (e.g., convergent and discriminant). The confirmatory stage involves replicating factor structure using a more restrictive model, identifying areas of model strain, conducting additional tests of concurrent and predictive validity, and evaluating measurement invariance. Recommendations are provided for ( ) item generation, ( ) how to use different types of exploratory and confirmatory factor models to determine structure, and ( ) evaluating reliability and validity using a latent variable measurement model approach.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1548-5951
1548-5951
DOI:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-115343