Computationally-Friendly Argumentation Schemes
In an agent activity both paradigmatic aspects of communication and reasoning can be naturally enriched by argumentation. The contribution of this research is a computationally-friendly framework for formalizing paraconsistent argumentation schemes in information-rich environments. This goal is achi...
Saved in:
| Published in: | 2014 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT) Vol. 3; pp. 167 - 174 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Conference Proceeding |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IEEE
01.08.2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In an agent activity both paradigmatic aspects of communication and reasoning can be naturally enriched by argumentation. The contribution of this research is a computationally-friendly framework for formalizing paraconsistent argumentation schemes in information-rich environments. This goal is achieved by extending agent's reasoning capabilities with non-deductive methods like argumentation skills. We provide a~generic paraconsistent program template permitting for implementation of various argumentation schemes. To do this, we appeal to techniques specific for the~four-valued framework of 4ql, the~rule-based, dlognneg-like query language. Although dealing with paraconsistency in argumentation schemes is not a new subject, our computational approach takes advantage of the tractability of 4ql. The paper concludes with an example of the Expert Opinion scheme implemented in 4ql. |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1109/WI-IAT.2014.164 |