Compilation of Shape Operators on Sparse Arrays

We show how to build a compiler for a sparse array language that supports shape operators such as reshaping or concatenating arrays, in addition to compute operators. Existing sparse array programming systems implement generic shape operators for only some sparse data structures, reduce shape operat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of ACM on programming languages Jg. 8; H. OOPSLA2; S. 1162 - 1188
Hauptverfasser: Root, Alexander J, Yan, Bobby, Liu, Peiming, Gyurgyik, Christophe, Bik, Aart J.C., Kjolstad, Fredrik
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: New York, NY, USA ACM 08.10.2024
Schlagworte:
Domain specific languages
Software and its engineering
Source code generation
sparse array programming
sparse iteration theory
sparse data structures
ISSN:2475-1421, 2475-1421
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We show how to build a compiler for a sparse array language that supports shape operators such as reshaping or concatenating arrays, in addition to compute operators. Existing sparse array programming systems implement generic shape operators for only some sparse data structures, reduce shape operators on other data structures to those, and do not support fusion. Our system compiles sparse array expressions to code that efficiently iterates over reshaped views of irregular sparse data structures, without needing to materialize temporary storage for intermediates. Our evaluation shows that our approach generates sparse array code competitive with popular sparse array libraries: our generated shape operators achieve geometric mean speed-ups of 1.66×–15.3× when compared to hand-written kernels in scipy.sparse and 1.67×–651× when compared to generic implementations in pydata/sparse. For operators that require data structure conversions in these libraries, our generated code achieves geometric mean speed-ups of 7.29×–13.0× when compared to scipy.sparse and 21.3×–511× when compared to pydata/sparse. Finally, our evaluation demonstrates that fusing shape and compute operators improves the performance of several expressions by geometric mean speed-ups of 1.22×–2.23×.
ISSN:2475-1421
2475-1421
DOI:10.1145/3689752