An Empirical Comparison of Dynamic Impact Analysis Algorithms
Impact analysis determining the potential effects of changes on a software system plays an important role in software engineering tasks such as maintenance, regression testing, and debugging. In previous work, two new dynamic impact analysis techniques, Coverage Impact and Path Impact, were presente...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | International Conference on Software Engineering: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering; 23-28 May 2004 s. 491 - 500 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , |
| Médium: | Konferenční příspěvek |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
Washington, DC, USA
IEEE Computer Society
23.05.2004
|
| Edice: | ACM Conferences |
| Témata: |
Software and its engineering
> Software creation and management
> Software post-development issues
> Software reverse engineering
Software and its engineering
> Software creation and management
> Software verification and validation
> Software defect analysis
> Software testing and debugging
|
| ISBN: | 9780769521633, 0769521630 |
| ISSN: | 0270-5257 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Shrnutí: | Impact analysis determining the potential effects of changes on a software system plays an important role in software engineering tasks such as maintenance, regression testing, and debugging. In previous work, two new dynamic impact analysis techniques, Coverage Impact and Path Impact, were presented. These techniques perform impact analysis based on data gathered about program behavior relative to specific inputs, such as inputs gathered from field data, operational profile data, or test-suite executions.Due to various characteristics of the algorithms they employ, Coverage Impact and Path Impact are expected to differ in terms of cost and precision; however, there have been no studies to date examining the extent to which such differences may emerge in practice. Since cost-precision trade offs may play an important role in technique selection and further research, we wished to examine these trade offs.We therefore designed and performed an empirical study,comparing the execution and space costs of the techniques,as well as the precisions of the impact analysis results that they report. This paper presents the results of this study. |
|---|---|
| Bibliografie: | SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-1 ObjectType-Conference Paper-1 content type line 25 |
| ISBN: | 9780769521633 0769521630 |
| ISSN: | 0270-5257 |
| DOI: | 10.5555/998675.999453 |

