Compass visualizations for human-robotic interaction
Compasses have been used for centuries to express directions and are commonplace in many user interfaces; however, there has not been work in human-robotic interaction (HRI) to ascertain how different compass visualizations affect the interaction. This paper presents a HRI evaluation comparing two r...
Saved in:
| Published in: | 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) pp. 49 - 56 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Conference Proceeding |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York, NY, USA
ACM
12.03.2008
IEEE |
| Series: | ACM Conferences |
| Subjects: | |
| ISBN: | 1605580171, 9781605580173 |
| ISSN: | 2167-2121 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Compasses have been used for centuries to express directions and are commonplace in many user interfaces; however, there has not been work in human-robotic interaction (HRI) to ascertain how different compass visualizations affect the interaction. This paper presents a HRI evaluation comparing two representative compass visualizations: top-down and in-world world-aligned. The compass visualizations were evaluated to ascertain which one provides better metric judgment accuracy, lowers workload, provides better situational awareness, is perceived as easier to use, and is preferred. Twenty-four participants completed a within-subject repeated measures experiment. The results agreed with the existing principles relating to 2D and 3D views, or projections of a three-dimensional scene, in that a top-down (2D view) compass visualization is easier to use for metric judgment tasks and a world-aligned (3D view) compass visualization yields faster performance for general navigation tasks. The implication for HRI is that the choice in compass visualization has a definite and non-trivial impact on operator performance (world-aligned was faster), situational awareness (top-down was better), and perceived ease of use (top-down was easier). |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 1605580171 9781605580173 |
| ISSN: | 2167-2121 |
| DOI: | 10.1145/1349822.1349830 |

