Accuracy of a feed formulation algorithm for predicting milk yield in lactating cows.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Accuracy of a feed formulation algorithm for predicting milk yield in lactating cows.
Authors: Mtawali, Mulunji1 (AUTHOR) 200101502@luanar.ac.mw, Kawonga, Bettie1 (AUTHOR), Banda, Liveness Jessica1 (AUTHOR), Chigwa, Fanny1 (AUTHOR), Chiumia, Daniel1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Discover Animals (3004-894X). 2/27/2026, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p1-19. 19p.
Document Type: Article
Subjects: Milk yield, Model validation, Animal feeds, Dairy farms, Lactation in cattle, Linear programming, Cattle nutrition, Nutritional requirements
Geographic Terms: Africa
Author-Supplied Keywords: Diet Optimization
Feed formulation
Linear Programming
Milk Yield
Abstract: Optimized feed formulation remains a significant challenge in smallholder dairy systems in sub-Saharan Africa due to seasonal variability in feed resources and limited access to nutrition expertise. An automated feed formulation algorithm was previously developed to address these gaps using linear programming and nutrient requirements for dairy cattle. This study aimed to validate the algorithm's predictive accuracy and precision by comparing model-predicted milk yields with observed yields from 15 lactating cows, comprising six Holstein Friesians (HF) and nine Holstein Friesian–Zebu crosses (HFZ), managed under smallholder conditions in Malawi. Cows were individually fed tailored diets generated by the algorithm over a 30-day period in a challenge-feeding approach. Observed milk yield, body weight, body condition score, and milk composition were recorded. Predictive performance was assessed using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Bias (MB), and coefficient of determination (R²). Results showed moderate CCC (0.772) and R² (0.899) when predictions were aggregated for the entire trial period, while daily RMSE and MB values indicated a mean overestimation of 2.96 kg. Observed milk yield was also significantly influenced by days in milk and feed intake, suggesting that both farm-level management and individual cow variation contributed to differences between predicted and observed production. The tool demonstrated reasonable predictive ability for milk yield and potential practical field application; however, the results highlight areas requiring further refinement to improve model precision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Discover Animals (3004-894X) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Author Affiliations: 1https://ror.org/0188qm081 Department of Animal Science, Bunda College of Agriculture, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, P. O. Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi
Full Text Word Count: 8759
DOI: 10.1007/s44338-026-00178-y
Accession Number: 191978755
Database: Veterinary Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Optimized feed formulation remains a significant challenge in smallholder dairy systems in sub-Saharan Africa due to seasonal variability in feed resources and limited access to nutrition expertise. An automated feed formulation algorithm was previously developed to address these gaps using linear programming and nutrient requirements for dairy cattle. This study aimed to validate the algorithm's predictive accuracy and precision by comparing model-predicted milk yields with observed yields from 15 lactating cows, comprising six Holstein Friesians (HF) and nine Holstein Friesian–Zebu crosses (HFZ), managed under smallholder conditions in Malawi. Cows were individually fed tailored diets generated by the algorithm over a 30-day period in a challenge-feeding approach. Observed milk yield, body weight, body condition score, and milk composition were recorded. Predictive performance was assessed using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Bias (MB), and coefficient of determination (R²). Results showed moderate CCC (0.772) and R² (0.899) when predictions were aggregated for the entire trial period, while daily RMSE and MB values indicated a mean overestimation of 2.96 kg. Observed milk yield was also significantly influenced by days in milk and feed intake, suggesting that both farm-level management and individual cow variation contributed to differences between predicted and observed production. The tool demonstrated reasonable predictive ability for milk yield and potential practical field application; however, the results highlight areas requiring further refinement to improve model precision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
DOI:10.1007/s44338-026-00178-y