Legal freshwater turtle meat trade in Indonesia only marginally contributes to collectors' livelihoods.
Uloženo v:
| Název: | Legal freshwater turtle meat trade in Indonesia only marginally contributes to collectors' livelihoods. |
|---|---|
| Autoři: | Nijman, Vincent1 (AUTHOR) vnijman@brookes.ac.uk, Shepherd, Chris R.2,3 (AUTHOR) |
| Zdroj: | Discover Animals (3004-894X). Dec2025, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p1-9. 9p. |
| Druh dokumentu: | Article |
| Témata: | Wild animal trade, Income, Nature conservation, Indonesians, Trade regulation, Turtles |
| Geografický termín: | Indonesia |
| Author-Supplied Keywords: | Quotas Reptiles Sustainable trade Unsustainable wildlife trade |
| Abstrakt: | In Indonesia tens of thousands of freshwater turtles and tortoises are collected and traded annually for their meat, including a large proportion that is exported. Proponents of international wildlife trade often state that such international trade directly contributes to the livelihoods of numerous families, especially those at the source end of the trade chain, i.e., harvesters and collectors. We note, however, that surprisingly little direct evidence is available for this assertion. To better understand the value of such trade to the livelihoods of those at the source end of the trade chain we explored to what extend the legal harvest of these turtles for the domestic and international meat trade in Indonesia supports livelihoods. Harvest and trade of freshwater turtles and tortoises in Indonesia is regulated through an annually set province-by-province quota system, and annually around 50,000 turtles belonging to four species are allowed to be collected from the wild. For each province we calculated the total monetary value of turtles for collectors, and we divided this by the government's recommended minimum wage for each province arriving at the number of collectors that can legally earn a minimum wage by collecting turtles. We find that, nation-wide, legal collection allows a maximum of between 241 and 360 collectors (0–41 per province) to gain a year-round minimum wage, without including costs for permits, transportation, equipment and other expenses. Given that the legal trade in turtles provides so few people with a minimal amount of income, and given the increasingly imperilled status of numerous freshwater turtle and tortoise species, and the decline in Indonesia's freshwater turtle and tortoise species in particular, we question whether allowing this trade is an effective livelihood strategy and whether such unsustainable trade should continue to be promoted and allowed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Discover Animals (3004-894X) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Author Affiliations: | 1https://ror.org/04v2twj65 Oxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK 2Monitor Conservation Research Society, Big Lake Ranch, BC, Canada 3https://ror.org/04tehfn33 IUCN SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland |
| Full Text Word Count: | 5855 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s44338-025-00062-1 |
| Přístupové číslo: | 191837978 |
| Databáze: | Veterinary Source |
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje
Pro úplný přístup je nutné se přihlásit.
|
|
| Abstrakt: | In Indonesia tens of thousands of freshwater turtles and tortoises are collected and traded annually for their meat, including a large proportion that is exported. Proponents of international wildlife trade often state that such international trade directly contributes to the livelihoods of numerous families, especially those at the source end of the trade chain, i.e., harvesters and collectors. We note, however, that surprisingly little direct evidence is available for this assertion. To better understand the value of such trade to the livelihoods of those at the source end of the trade chain we explored to what extend the legal harvest of these turtles for the domestic and international meat trade in Indonesia supports livelihoods. Harvest and trade of freshwater turtles and tortoises in Indonesia is regulated through an annually set province-by-province quota system, and annually around 50,000 turtles belonging to four species are allowed to be collected from the wild. For each province we calculated the total monetary value of turtles for collectors, and we divided this by the government's recommended minimum wage for each province arriving at the number of collectors that can legally earn a minimum wage by collecting turtles. We find that, nation-wide, legal collection allows a maximum of between 241 and 360 collectors (0–41 per province) to gain a year-round minimum wage, without including costs for permits, transportation, equipment and other expenses. Given that the legal trade in turtles provides so few people with a minimal amount of income, and given the increasingly imperilled status of numerous freshwater turtle and tortoise species, and the decline in Indonesia's freshwater turtle and tortoise species in particular, we question whether allowing this trade is an effective livelihood strategy and whether such unsustainable trade should continue to be promoted and allowed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s44338-025-00062-1 |