Body Weight Estimation in Holstein × Zebu Crossbred Heifers: Comparative Analysis of XGBoost and LightGBM Algorithms.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Body Weight Estimation in Holstein × Zebu Crossbred Heifers: Comparative Analysis of XGBoost and LightGBM Algorithms.
Authors: Herrera‐Camacho, Jose1 (AUTHOR), Tırınk, Cem2 (AUTHOR) cem.tirink@gmail.com, Parra‐Cortés, Rosa Inés3 (AUTHOR), Bayyurt, Lütfi4 (AUTHOR), Uskenov, Rashit5 (AUTHOR), Omarova, Karlygash6 (AUTHOR), Makhanbetova, Aizhan6 (AUTHOR), Chekirov, Kadyrbai7 (AUTHOR), Chay‐Canul, Alfonso Juventino8 (AUTHOR)
Source: Veterinary Medicine & Science. Jul2025, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p1-10. 10p.
Document Type: Article
Subjects: Machine learning, Milk yield, Body weight, Heifers, Rural geography
Author-Supplied Keywords: body weight prediction
crossbred heifer
LightGBM
machine learning
XGBoost
Abstract: This study evaluates the effectiveness of XGBoost and LightGBM algorithms for estimating the live weight of Holstein×Zebu crossbred heifers. The study compares the performance of both algorithms using a wide range of biometric measurements and tests various hyperparameter settings. The research results show that the XGBoost algorithm provides almost perfect agreement with an R2 value of 0.999 on the training set and high performance with an R2 value of 0.986 on the test set. The LightGBM algorithm also achieved effective results with R2 values of 0.986 and 0.981 on both training and test sets. The machine learning algorithms used in the current study stand out as having the potential to provide a practical and economical solution for live weight estimation in livestock enterprises and especially for herd management applications in rural areas through input variables such as body measurements, milk yield, etc. However, the obtained results in the current study reveal the potential of machine learning algorithms for live weight estimation in the livestock sector and indicate that advanced research is needed for the optimisation of these algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Veterinary Medicine & Science is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Author Affiliations: 1Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia Michoacán,, Mexico
2Department of Animal Science, Igdir University, Faculty of Agriculture, Iğdır, Türkiye
3Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales U.D.C.A, Área de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Grupo de Investigación en Ciencia Animal, Bogotá, Colombia
4Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Türkiye
5Agronomic Faculty, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan
6Faculty of Veterinary and Livestock Technology, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan
7Kyrgyz‐Turkish Manas University, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic
8División Académica de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Villahermosa Tabasco,, México
Full Text Word Count: 7136
ISSN: 2053-1095
DOI: 10.1002/vms3.70422
Accession Number: 186810057
Database: Veterinary Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:This study evaluates the effectiveness of XGBoost and LightGBM algorithms for estimating the live weight of Holstein×Zebu crossbred heifers. The study compares the performance of both algorithms using a wide range of biometric measurements and tests various hyperparameter settings. The research results show that the XGBoost algorithm provides almost perfect agreement with an R2 value of 0.999 on the training set and high performance with an R2 value of 0.986 on the test set. The LightGBM algorithm also achieved effective results with R2 values of 0.986 and 0.981 on both training and test sets. The machine learning algorithms used in the current study stand out as having the potential to provide a practical and economical solution for live weight estimation in livestock enterprises and especially for herd management applications in rural areas through input variables such as body measurements, milk yield, etc. However, the obtained results in the current study reveal the potential of machine learning algorithms for live weight estimation in the livestock sector and indicate that advanced research is needed for the optimisation of these algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:20531095
DOI:10.1002/vms3.70422