The evaluation of animal welfare indicators based on transport duration and lighting differences in the slaughter of broiler chickens.
Saved in:
| Title: | The evaluation of animal welfare indicators based on transport duration and lighting differences in the slaughter of broiler chickens. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Widia Siska1 siskawidia@apps.ipb.ac.id, Hadri Latif2, Trioso Purnawarman2 |
| Source: | Open Veterinary Journal. 2025, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p1990-1997. 8p. |
| Document Type: | Article |
| Subjects: | Broiler chickens, Blue light, Light emitting diodes, Slaughtering, Corticosterone, Animal welfare |
| Author-Supplied Keywords: | Lighting differences Transport duration |
| Abstract: | Background: The preslaughter process is a critical point in implementing animal welfare principles in poultry slaughterhouses. The duration of transportation from the farm to the poultry slaughterhouse and differences in lighting in the preslaughter room can affect animal welfare. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate animal welfare indicators by measuring corticosterone hormone concentration, bleeding time, and carcass quality in broiler chickens considering differences in transport duration and lighting conditions in the preslaughter room. Methods: This study used a completely randomized design with four treatments and two replications. A total of 40 chickens were sampled. The study was conducted across four treatments: (1) transport duration from the farm to the poultry slaughterhouses ≤2 hours; (2) transport duration from the farm to the poultry slaughterhouses >2 hours; (3) blue lighting; and (4) white lighting. For treatments (1) and (2), 10 chickens from different farms were used for each replicate. Treatment groups (1) and (2) received treatments (3) and (4) using blue light-emitting diode (LED) lights with an intensity of 18 lux and white LED lights with an intensity of 321 lux for 15 seconds. Treatment groups (3) and (4) each consisted of 5 chickens per replication exposed to blue or white light in the preslaughter room. Results: The average concentration of corticosterone hormone in blue and white light was 21.329 ng/ml and white light was 26.742 ng/ml. The average bleeding time under blue lighting was 187.15 seconds, and under white lighting, it was 203.05 seconds. Blue-light lighting can maintain carcass quality by 100% compared to white-light lighting, which produces varying quality. Conclusion: Corticosterone hormone concentration, bleeding time, and carcass quality were influenced by lighting. The use of blue light preslaughter significantly improved the corticosterone hormone concentration, bleeding time, and carcass quality compared with white light. Overall, blue lighting resulted in better animal welfare indicators for broiler chickens in poultry slaughterhouses. Blue lighting is recommended for implementation at poultry slaughterhouses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Open Veterinary Journal is the property of Open Veterinary Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Author Affiliations: | 1Graduate Program in Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia 2Division of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia |
| ISSN: | 2226-4485 |
| DOI: | 10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i5.13 |
| Accession Number: | 186438634 |
| Database: | Veterinary Source |
| Abstract: | Background: The preslaughter process is a critical point in implementing animal welfare principles in poultry slaughterhouses. The duration of transportation from the farm to the poultry slaughterhouse and differences in lighting in the preslaughter room can affect animal welfare. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate animal welfare indicators by measuring corticosterone hormone concentration, bleeding time, and carcass quality in broiler chickens considering differences in transport duration and lighting conditions in the preslaughter room. Methods: This study used a completely randomized design with four treatments and two replications. A total of 40 chickens were sampled. The study was conducted across four treatments: (1) transport duration from the farm to the poultry slaughterhouses ≤2 hours; (2) transport duration from the farm to the poultry slaughterhouses >2 hours; (3) blue lighting; and (4) white lighting. For treatments (1) and (2), 10 chickens from different farms were used for each replicate. Treatment groups (1) and (2) received treatments (3) and (4) using blue light-emitting diode (LED) lights with an intensity of 18 lux and white LED lights with an intensity of 321 lux for 15 seconds. Treatment groups (3) and (4) each consisted of 5 chickens per replication exposed to blue or white light in the preslaughter room. Results: The average concentration of corticosterone hormone in blue and white light was 21.329 ng/ml and white light was 26.742 ng/ml. The average bleeding time under blue lighting was 187.15 seconds, and under white lighting, it was 203.05 seconds. Blue-light lighting can maintain carcass quality by 100% compared to white-light lighting, which produces varying quality. Conclusion: Corticosterone hormone concentration, bleeding time, and carcass quality were influenced by lighting. The use of blue light preslaughter significantly improved the corticosterone hormone concentration, bleeding time, and carcass quality compared with white light. Overall, blue lighting resulted in better animal welfare indicators for broiler chickens in poultry slaughterhouses. Blue lighting is recommended for implementation at poultry slaughterhouses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 22264485 |
| DOI: | 10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i5.13 |