Can qPCR on pooled sheep milk detect brucellosis as part of herd brucellosis control and eradication programs?
Saved in:
| Title: | Can qPCR on pooled sheep milk detect brucellosis as part of herd brucellosis control and eradication programs? |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Aminzadeh, Mohammad Javad1 (AUTHOR), Hashemi, Khadijeh2 (AUTHOR), Rahmani, Hamideh Kalateh3 (AUTHOR), Khaleghnia, Narges3 (AUTHOR), Azizzadeh, Mohammad1 (AUTHOR), Mirshokraei, Pezhman1,3 (AUTHOR) mirshokraei@um.ac.ir |
| Source: | BMC Veterinary Research. 4/9/2025, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p1-8. 8p. |
| Document Type: | Article |
| Subjects: | Sheep milk, Microbial cultures, Brucella melitensis, Brucella, Animal experimentation, Zoonoses |
| Author-Supplied Keywords: | Pooled milk QPCR Sheep |
| Abstract: | Background: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease occurring worldwide. Brucella melitensis is the main cause of malta fever in humans and a major cause of abortion in sheep. In herd control and prevention programs, applying a suitable noninvasive method for accurate, rapid, and cost-effective monitoring of infected animals is a major concern. This study aimed to investigate lots of pooled sheep milk using qPCR to detect Brucella spp. infection in sheep. By calculating the limit of detection of Brucella in qPCR and microbial culture, the maximum number of pooled milk lots that retained the ability to be identified positively for Brucella was determined. A total of 144 milk samples were collected from the different seropositive sheep herds. The samples were randomly divided into six groups, each further divided into two subgroups, respectively. Then, DNA extraction was performed on 186 pooled and individual samples, followed by qPCR. Results: The minimum detectable limits for qPCR and microbial culture per ml of milk were 100 and 300 CFU, respectively. Only 40% of the samples in microbial culture tested positive when the concentration decreased to 200 CFU. The results of qPCR indicated that four pools of 24 tested positive, whereas two pools tested negative. After examining the subgroups and individual samples within the two negative groups, it was revealed that all qPCR tests for these samples were negative. In the positive pools, at least one of the samples in the subgroups and corresponding individual samples tested positive. The two positive pools of 24, contained only one individual positive sample in each, indicating that the qPCR test could detect a positive Brucella sample in a pool of 24. Conclusions: This noninvasive (milk instead of blood), rapid, and cost-effective method can be used to monitor suspected herds to identify infected animals with fewer tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of BMC Veterinary Research is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Author Affiliations: | 1https://ror.org/00g6ka752 Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran 2https://ror.org/00g6ka752 Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Research Group, Research Institute of Biotechnology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran 3https://ror.org/00g6ka752 Center of Excellence in Ruminant Abortion and Neonatal Mortality, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran |
| Full Text Word Count: | 5896 |
| ISSN: | 1746-6148 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12917-025-04660-9 |
| Accession Number: | 184385838 |
| Database: | Veterinary Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Background: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease occurring worldwide. Brucella melitensis is the main cause of malta fever in humans and a major cause of abortion in sheep. In herd control and prevention programs, applying a suitable noninvasive method for accurate, rapid, and cost-effective monitoring of infected animals is a major concern. This study aimed to investigate lots of pooled sheep milk using qPCR to detect Brucella spp. infection in sheep. By calculating the limit of detection of Brucella in qPCR and microbial culture, the maximum number of pooled milk lots that retained the ability to be identified positively for Brucella was determined. A total of 144 milk samples were collected from the different seropositive sheep herds. The samples were randomly divided into six groups, each further divided into two subgroups, respectively. Then, DNA extraction was performed on 186 pooled and individual samples, followed by qPCR. Results: The minimum detectable limits for qPCR and microbial culture per ml of milk were 100 and 300 CFU, respectively. Only 40% of the samples in microbial culture tested positive when the concentration decreased to 200 CFU. The results of qPCR indicated that four pools of 24 tested positive, whereas two pools tested negative. After examining the subgroups and individual samples within the two negative groups, it was revealed that all qPCR tests for these samples were negative. In the positive pools, at least one of the samples in the subgroups and corresponding individual samples tested positive. The two positive pools of 24, contained only one individual positive sample in each, indicating that the qPCR test could detect a positive Brucella sample in a pool of 24. Conclusions: This noninvasive (milk instead of blood), rapid, and cost-effective method can be used to monitor suspected herds to identify infected animals with fewer tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 17466148 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12917-025-04660-9 |