Effectiveness of Ministry of Internal Affairs Regulation Number 15 Year 2008 about Mainstreaming Gender on Basic Education Level in the East Java, Indonesia
Saved in:
| Title: | Effectiveness of Ministry of Internal Affairs Regulation Number 15 Year 2008 about Mainstreaming Gender on Basic Education Level in the East Java, Indonesia |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Handayani, Trisakti, Widodo, Wahyu |
| Source: | Journal of Education and Practice. 2016 7(9):66-72. |
| Availability: | IISTE. No 1 Central, Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong SAR. Tel: +852-39485948; e-mail: JEP@iiste.org; Web site: http://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 7 |
| Publication Date: | 2016 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, Observation, Interviews, Sex Fairness, Females, Accountability, Governance, Gender Discrimination, Gender Issues, Qualitative Research, Statistical Analysis |
| Geographic Terms: | Indonesia |
| ISSN: | 2222-1735 |
| Abstract: | General purpose of this research are: assessing the implementation of Permendagri no. 15 year 2008 about Gender Mainstreaming on Basic Education Levels in the East Java Province, analyze the problem of the implementation of Permendagri no. 15 year 2008 about Gender Mainstreaming on Basic Education Levels in the East Java Province and analyze the effectiveness of Permendagri no. 15 year 2008 about Gender Mainstreaming on Basic Education Levels in the East Java Province. This research used a quantitative approach supported by qualitative, while the design of the research was a qualitative and quantitative descriptive design. The data required were primary and secondary data. The subject of this research was Permendagri no. 15 year 2008 on General Guidelines for Implementation of Gender Mainstreaming in the Region. Data was collected through observation, interviews and documentation studies. Analysis of data used quantitative and qualitative descriptive analysis and is supported by the Gender Analysis Pathways (GAP), Parity and Disparity Index. The conclusion of this research was in the education policy especially on issues of access and equality of education had been a gender perspective. But in the level of implementation was still uneven implementation of gender policy in basic education. In general, there was gender equalities for the aspect of access and equality of education. There were gender inequalities disadvantage men in the aspect of quality and relevance of education. While there were gender inequalities disadvantage women in the accountability and governance aspects of education. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 34 |
| Entry Date: | 2016 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1095825 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | General purpose of this research are: assessing the implementation of Permendagri no. 15 year 2008 about Gender Mainstreaming on Basic Education Levels in the East Java Province, analyze the problem of the implementation of Permendagri no. 15 year 2008 about Gender Mainstreaming on Basic Education Levels in the East Java Province and analyze the effectiveness of Permendagri no. 15 year 2008 about Gender Mainstreaming on Basic Education Levels in the East Java Province. This research used a quantitative approach supported by qualitative, while the design of the research was a qualitative and quantitative descriptive design. The data required were primary and secondary data. The subject of this research was Permendagri no. 15 year 2008 on General Guidelines for Implementation of Gender Mainstreaming in the Region. Data was collected through observation, interviews and documentation studies. Analysis of data used quantitative and qualitative descriptive analysis and is supported by the Gender Analysis Pathways (GAP), Parity and Disparity Index. The conclusion of this research was in the education policy especially on issues of access and equality of education had been a gender perspective. But in the level of implementation was still uneven implementation of gender policy in basic education. In general, there was gender equalities for the aspect of access and equality of education. There were gender inequalities disadvantage men in the aspect of quality and relevance of education. While there were gender inequalities disadvantage women in the accountability and governance aspects of education. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2222-1735 |