Zobrazit v EDS

Processing the Geopolitics of Global Science: Emerging National-Level Advisory Structures

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Processing the Geopolitics of Global Science: Emerging National-Level Advisory Structures
Autoři: Shih, Tommy, Chubb, Andrew, Cooney O´Donoghue, Diarmuid
Přispěvatelé: Lund University, Lund University School of Economics and Management, LUSEM, Department of Business Administration, Marketing, Lunds universitet, Ekonomihögskolan, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, Marknadsföring, Originator
Zdroj: Journal of Studies in International Education. 29(2):300-318
Témata: Social Sciences, Economics and Business, Business Administration, Samhällsvetenskap, Ekonomi och näringsliv, Företagsekonomi
Popis: This paper analyses three governments’ institutional advisory mechanisms designed to shape and support universities and individual researchers’ decisions regarding international academic collaboration. Although ostensibly country-agnostic, increasing geopolitical tensions with China have catalyzed the creation of these new structures. Each mechanism seeks to address the complex trade-offs in international research collaboration caused by the complicated relationship between China and other advanced science nations. We compare the National Contact Point for Knowledge Security in the Netherlands; the Research Collaboration Advice Team and associated “Trusted Research” campaign in the United Kingdom (UK); and Australia's “University Foreign Interference Taskforce” process. The paper finds similarities in their goals - elevating national interest and security as considerations in research collaboration decisionmaking in order to enable it to continue under narrowed conditions - but divergences in their structure,usage and accessibility that produce distinctive strengths and shortcomings.
Přístupová URL adresa: https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153241307971
Databáze: SwePub
Popis
Abstrakt:This paper analyses three governments’ institutional advisory mechanisms designed to shape and support universities and individual researchers’ decisions regarding international academic collaboration. Although ostensibly country-agnostic, increasing geopolitical tensions with China have catalyzed the creation of these new structures. Each mechanism seeks to address the complex trade-offs in international research collaboration caused by the complicated relationship between China and other advanced science nations. We compare the National Contact Point for Knowledge Security in the Netherlands; the Research Collaboration Advice Team and associated “Trusted Research” campaign in the United Kingdom (UK); and Australia's “University Foreign Interference Taskforce” process. The paper finds similarities in their goals - elevating national interest and security as considerations in research collaboration decisionmaking in order to enable it to continue under narrowed conditions - but divergences in their structure,usage and accessibility that produce distinctive strengths and shortcomings.
DOI:10.1177/10283153241307971