In EDS ansehen

EU Consumer Law and the Artificial Intelligence Act: Two Worlds Apart?

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: EU Consumer Law and the Artificial Intelligence Act: Two Worlds Apart?
Autoren: Ebers, Martin, 1970
Quelle: The Cambridge Handbook of AI and Consumer Law HBK Cambridge law handbooks. :215-235
Schlagwörter: Artificial Intelligence Act or AI Act, Generative AI, High-risk AI systems, Harmonised standards, Conformity assessment, Consumer vulnerability, Prohibited practices, Subliminal techniques, Juridik, Law
Beschreibung: This chapter analyses whether the AI Act sufficiently addresses consumers' interests and how the regulation blends into the existing system of consumer law. Section 15.2 provides an overview of the use of AI in consumer markets and the related risks for consumers, followed by a summary of the AI Act in section 15.3. Section 15.4 then focuses on prohibited practices, while section 15.5 analyses how so-called "generative AI systems" are regulated. Section 15.6 thereafter addresses the definition of high-risk AI systems and the corresponding mandatory requirements as well as the role of harmonised standards and conformity assessment procedures to protect consumer interests. Section 15.7 evaluates the provisions of the AI Act for low-risk AI systems, while section 15.8 examines how the AI Act will be enforced. Section 15.9 draws final conclusions.
Dateibeschreibung: print
Zugangs-URL: https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-118674
Datenbank: SwePub
Beschreibung
Abstract:This chapter analyses whether the AI Act sufficiently addresses consumers' interests and how the regulation blends into the existing system of consumer law. Section 15.2 provides an overview of the use of AI in consumer markets and the related risks for consumers, followed by a summary of the AI Act in section 15.3. Section 15.4 then focuses on prohibited practices, while section 15.5 analyses how so-called "generative AI systems" are regulated. Section 15.6 thereafter addresses the definition of high-risk AI systems and the corresponding mandatory requirements as well as the role of harmonised standards and conformity assessment procedures to protect consumer interests. Section 15.7 evaluates the provisions of the AI Act for low-risk AI systems, while section 15.8 examines how the AI Act will be enforced. Section 15.9 draws final conclusions.
DOI:10.1017/9781009483599.022