Unravelling collaboration mechanisms for green logistics: the perspectives of shippers and logistics service providers

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Unravelling collaboration mechanisms for green logistics: the perspectives of shippers and logistics service providers
Autoren: Jazairy, Amer, von Haartman, Robin, Björklund, Maria
Quelle: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 51(4):423-448
Schlagwörter: Environmental sustainability, Green supply chain management, Third-party logistics, 3PL, LSP, Sweden, Survey, Transport, Relational view
Beschreibung: Purpose The green logistics literature remains undecided on how collaboration between shippers (i.e. logistics buyers) and logistics service providers (LSPs) may facilitate green logistics practices (GLPs). This paper identifies two types of collaboration mechanisms, relation specific and knowledge sharing, to systematically examine their influence on facilitating the different types of GLPs - as seen by shippers versus LSPs. Design/methodology/approach Survey responses of 169 shippers and 162 LSPs in Sweden were collected and analysed using exploratory- and confirmatory factor analysis, followed by multiple regression analysis. Findings The findings reveal that neither of the actors consistently favour a certain type of collaboration mechanisms for facilitating all types of GLPs. Although it was found that both actors share the same view on the role of collaboration mechanisms for some GLPs, their views took contrasting forms for others. Research limitations/implications This study contributes to the green logistics literature by incorporating a trilateral distinction to present collaboration recommendations for GLPs, based on (1) the collaboration mechanism at play, (2) the actors perspective and (3) the GLP in question. Practical implications Insights are offered to managers at shipper/LSP firms to apply the right ("fit for purpose") collaboration mechanisms in their relationships with their logistics partners with respect to the desired GLPs. Originality/value This is one of the first large-scale studies to systematically reveal in what way collaboration can facilitate the different types of GLPs.
Dateibeschreibung: electronic
Zugangs-URL: https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-175078
https://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1545774/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Datenbank: SwePub
Beschreibung
Abstract:Purpose The green logistics literature remains undecided on how collaboration between shippers (i.e. logistics buyers) and logistics service providers (LSPs) may facilitate green logistics practices (GLPs). This paper identifies two types of collaboration mechanisms, relation specific and knowledge sharing, to systematically examine their influence on facilitating the different types of GLPs - as seen by shippers versus LSPs. Design/methodology/approach Survey responses of 169 shippers and 162 LSPs in Sweden were collected and analysed using exploratory- and confirmatory factor analysis, followed by multiple regression analysis. Findings The findings reveal that neither of the actors consistently favour a certain type of collaboration mechanisms for facilitating all types of GLPs. Although it was found that both actors share the same view on the role of collaboration mechanisms for some GLPs, their views took contrasting forms for others. Research limitations/implications This study contributes to the green logistics literature by incorporating a trilateral distinction to present collaboration recommendations for GLPs, based on (1) the collaboration mechanism at play, (2) the actors perspective and (3) the GLP in question. Practical implications Insights are offered to managers at shipper/LSP firms to apply the right ("fit for purpose") collaboration mechanisms in their relationships with their logistics partners with respect to the desired GLPs. Originality/value This is one of the first large-scale studies to systematically reveal in what way collaboration can facilitate the different types of GLPs.
ISSN:09600035
1758664X
DOI:10.1108/IJPDLM-09-2019-0274