Electromagnetic interference pattern recognition tomography

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Electromagnetic interference pattern recognition tomography
Patent Number: 11892,491
Datum vydání: February 06, 2024
Appl. No: 17/174003
Application Filed: February 11, 2021
Abstrakt: An Electromagnetic Interference Pattern Recognition Tomography (EMIPRT) method for use in an image reconstruction system includes generating electromagnetic field data corresponding to an object in an imaging domain, via an electromagnetic tomography system, and using the generated electromagnetic field data, repeatedly, in recursive manner, forming an undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image based on the undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, recognizing electromagnetic interference patterns in the repeatedly formed disturbed electromagnetic interference images, and forming a superposition image by nullifying or diminishing the recognized electromagnetic interference patterns from the disturbed electromagnetic interference image. Forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image is also based on an object factor that is a function of the differences between experimentally electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic fields calculated during the step of forming an undisturbed electromagnetic interference image. After each repeated step of forming a superposition image, the method also includes determining whether a convergence objective has been reached.
Inventors: EMTensor GmbH (Vienna, AT)
Assignees: EMTensor GmbH (Vienna, AT)
Claim: 1. An image reconstruction system using electromagnetic interference pattern recognition tomography, comprising: an electromagnetic tomography system that generates electromagnetic field data corresponding to an object in an imaging domain, the electromagnetic tomography system including: a plurality of electromagnetic transmitters, a plurality of receivers that measure the electromagnetic data after being produced at the plurality of transmitters and interacting with the object, and a boundary apparatus; and a processing center that, using the generated electromagnetic field data, repeatedly, in recursive manner, carries out steps of: forming an undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image based at least in part on the undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, wherein such step of forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image is based at least in part on determination of an object factor that is a function of [mathematical expression included] where Ez ij Sim or Exp is the experimentally simulated or measured value, respectively, of a z-component of the electromagnetic field measured by receiver j when transmitter i is the source of the electromagnetic field, recognizing electromagnetic interference patterns in the repeatedly formed disturbed electromagnetic interference images, and forming a superposition image by nullifying or diminishing the recognized electromagnetic interference patterns from the disturbed electromagnetic interference image.
Claim: 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the object factor is determined as [mathematical expression included] where Ez ij Sim or Exp is the experimentally simulated or measured value, respectively, of a z-component of the electromagnetic field measured by receiver j when transmitter i is the source of the electromagnetic field, where M ij is presented in a general form as α*f(E ij Exp)+β*(Σ ij Ē ij *Σ ij E ij)+γ*Ω, where α,β and γ are coefficients of real non-zero or zero values, where Ω is a regularization operator, and where f(E ij Exp) is a function of its argument.
Claim: 3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the object factor is determined as [mathematical expression included] where Ez ij Sim or Exp is the experimentally simulated or measured value, respectively, of a z-component of the electromagnetic field measured by receiver j when transmitter i is the source of the electromagnetic field, and where max∥Ez ij Exp ∥ is the maximal norm of the experimentally measured z-component of the electromagnetic field.
Claim: 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the object factor is determined as [mathematical expression included] where Ez ij Sim or Exp is the experimentally simulated or measured value, respectively, of a z-component of the electromagnetic field measured by receiver j when transmitter i is the source of the electromagnetic field, and where ∥Ez ij Exp ∥ θ is the norm of the experimentally measured z-component of the electromagnetic field measured by receiver j when transmitter i is the source of the electromagnetic field in power of θ.
Claim: 5. The image reconstruction system of claim 1 , wherein the step of forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image based at least in part on the undisturbed electromagnetic interference image includes forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image based at least in part on determination of an object factor that is a function of the differences between experimentally electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic fields calculated during the step of forming an undisturbed electromagnetic interference image.
Claim: 6. The image reconstruction system of claim 1 , wherein the processing center further carries out a step, carried out after each repeated step of forming a superposition image, of determining whether a convergence objective has been reached.
Claim: 7. The image reconstruction system of claim 1 , wherein the steps carried out by the processing center are used as part of a method of generating 4D differential (dynamic) fused images.
Claim: 8. The image reconstruction system of claim 7 , wherein generating 4D differential (dynamic) fused images includes combining at least one successively-formed images indicating relative physiological change with a baseline anatomical image for display as a single unified image.
Claim: 9. The image reconstruction system of claim 8 , wherein the method of generating 4D differential (dynamic) fused images is used as part of a method of monitoring viability and/or functional conditions of biological tissue utilizing 4D dynamic fused electromagnetic pattern recognition tomography.
Claim: 10. The image reconstruction system of claim 1 , wherein the steps of forming an undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image based at least in part on the undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, recognizing electromagnetic interference patterns in the repeatedly formed disturbed electromagnetic interference images, and forming a superposition image by nullifying or diminishing the recognized electromagnetic interference patterns from the disturbed electromagnetic interference image are carried out sequentially.
Claim: 11. The image reconstruction system of claim 1 , further comprising a display unit that displays the superposition image.
Claim: 12. An image reconstruction system using electromagnetic interference pattern recognition tomography, comprising: an electromagnetic tomography system that generates electromagnetic field data corresponding to an object in an imaging domain, the electromagnetic tomography system including: a plurality of electromagnetic transmitters, a plurality of receivers that measure the electromagnetic data after being produced at the plurality of transmitters and interacting with the object, and a boundary apparatus; and a processing center that, using the generated electromagnetic field data, repeatedly, in recursive manner, carries out steps of: forming an undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image based at least in part on the undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, wherein such step includes forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image based at least in part on determination of an object factor that is a function of the differences between experimentally electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic fields calculated during the step of forming an undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, recognizing electromagnetic interference patterns in the repeatedly formed disturbed electromagnetic interference images, and forming a superposition image by nullifying or diminishing the recognized electromagnetic interference patterns from the disturbed electromagnetic interference image, and wherein the step of forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image includes calculation of: [mathematical expression included] where E i=1 to N (f k ,x,y,z) and E j=1 to M (f k ,x,y,z) are 3D electromagnetic fields (x,y,z) distribution from electromagnetic sources of frequency f k located at the positions of physical sources (from 1 to N) in the electromagnetic tomography system and at the position of physical receivers (from 1 to M) correspondingly, taken as conjugate values, and wherein Object Factor i,j is the “ij” th component of the object factor, from transmitter i to receiver j.
Claim: 13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the step of forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image includes calculation of [mathematical expression included] where E i=1 to N (f k ,x,y,z) and E j=1 to M (f k ,x,y,z) are 3D electromagnetic (x,y,z) distribution from electromagnetic sources of frequency f k located at the positions of physical sources (from 1 to N) in the electromagnetic tomography system and at the position of physical receivers (from 1 to M) correspondingly, taken as conjugate values, and wherein Object Factor i,j is the “ij” th component of the object factor, from transmitter i to receiver j.
Claim: 14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the step of recognizing electromagnetic interference patterns in the repeatedly formed disturbed electromagnetic interference images includes the calculation of sums [mathematical expression included] E i=1 to N (f k ,x,y,z) and E j=1 to M (f k ,x,y,z) are 3D electromagnetic (x,y,z) distribution from electromagnetic sources of frequency f k located at the positions of physical sources (from 1 to N) in the electromagnetic tomography system and at the position of the physical receivers (from 1 to M) correspondingly, taken as conjugate values, and wherein Object Factor i,j is the “ij” th component of the object factor, from transmitter i to receiver j.
Claim: 15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the step of recognizing electromagnetic interference patterns in the repeatedly formed disturbed electromagnetic interference images includes the calculation, for iteration i>1, [mathematical expression included] where for simplicity the frequency terms are omitted, where E i= (x,y,z) and E j= (x,y,z) are 3D electromagnetic fields (x,y,z) distribution from electromagnetic sources located at the positions of physical sources (from 1 to N) in the electromagnetic tomography system and at the position of the physical receivers (from 1 to M) correspondingly, taken as conjugate values, and wherein Object Factor i,j is the “ij” th component of the object factor, from transmitter i to receiver j.
Claim: 16. The system of claim 12 , further comprising a step, carried out after each repeated step of forming a superposition image, of determining whether a convergence objective has been reached.
Claim: 17. The system of claim 12 , wherein the steps carried out by the processing center are used as part of a method of generating 4D differential (dynamic) fused images.
Claim: 18. The system of claim 17 , wherein generating 4D differential (dynamic) fused images includes combining at least one successively-formed images indicating relative physiological change with a baseline anatomical image for display as a single unified image.
Claim: 19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the method of generating 4D differential (dynamic) fused images is used as part of a method of monitoring viability and/or functional conditions of biological tissue utilizing 4D dynamic fused electromagnetic pattern recognition tomography.
Claim: 20. The system of claim 12 , wherein the steps of forming an undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image based at least in part on the undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, recognizing electromagnetic interference patterns in the repeatedly formed disturbed electromagnetic interference images, and forming a superposition image by nullifying or diminishing the recognized electromagnetic interference patterns from the disturbed electromagnetic interference image are carried out sequentially.
Claim: 21. The system of claim 12 , further comprising a step of displaying the superposition image via a display unit.
Claim: 22. An image reconstruction system using electromagnetic interference pattern recognition tomography, comprising: an electromagnetic tomography system that generates electromagnetic field data corresponding to an object in an imaging domain, the electromagnetic tomography system including: a plurality of electromagnetic transmitters, a plurality of receivers that measure the electromagnetic data after being produced at the plurality of transmitters and interacting with the object, and a boundary apparatus; and a processing center that, using the generated electromagnetic field data, repeatedly, in recursive manner, carries out steps of: forming an undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image based at least in part on the undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, wherein such step includes forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image based at least in part on determination of an object factor that is a function of the differences between experimentally electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic fields calculated during the step of forming an undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, recognizing electromagnetic interference patterns in the repeatedly formed disturbed electromagnetic interference images, and forming a superposition image by nullifying or diminishing the recognized electromagnetic interference patterns from the disturbed electromagnetic interference image, and wherein the step of recognizing electromagnetic interference patterns in the repeatedly formed disturbed electromagnetic interference images includes the calculation of sums [mathematical expression included] where E i=1 to N (f k ,x,y,z) and E j=1 to M (f k ,x,y,z) are 3D electromagnetic fields (x,y,z) distribution from electromagnetic sources of frequency f k located at the positions of physical sources (from 1 to N) in the electromagnetic tomography system and at the position of the physical receivers (from 1 to M) correspondingly, taken as conjugate values, and wherein Object Factor i,j is the “ij” th component of the object factor, from transmitter i to receiver j.
Patent References Cited: 4135131 January 1979 Larsen et al.
4157472 June 1979 Beck, Jr. et al.
4247815 January 1981 Larsen et al.
4257278 March 1981 Papadofrangakis et al.
4638813 January 1987 Turner
4662222 May 1987 Johnson
4798209 January 1989 Klingenbeck et al.
4805627 February 1989 Klingenbeck et al.
4926868 May 1990 Larsen
5069223 December 1991 McRae
5222501 June 1993 Ideker et al.
5233713 August 1993 Murphy et al.
5263050 November 1993 Sutterlin et al.
5305748 April 1994 Wilk
5363050 November 1994 Guo et al.
5405346 April 1995 Grundy et al.
5715819 February 1998 Svenson et al.
5800350 September 1998 Coppleson et al.
6026173 February 2000 Svenson et al.
6073047 June 2000 Barsamian et al.
6332087 December 2001 Svenson et al.
6333087 December 2001 Jerdee et al.
6490471 December 2002 Svenson et al.
6503203 January 2003 Rafter et al.
6511427 January 2003 Sliwa, Jr. et al.
6522910 February 2003 Gregory
6697660 February 2004 Robinson
6865494 March 2005 Duensing et al.
7239731 July 2007 Semenov et al.
7272431 September 2007 McGrath
7340292 March 2008 Li
7876114 January 2011 Campbell et al.
8000775 August 2011 Pogue et al.
8089417 January 2012 Popovic et al.
8207733 June 2012 Meaney et al.
8253619 August 2012 Holbrook et al.
8376948 February 2013 Brannan
8708919 April 2014 Frazier
8724864 May 2014 Persson et al.
9072449 July 2015 Semenov
9414749 August 2016 Semenov
9414763 August 2016 Semenov
9414764 August 2016 Semenov
9675254 June 2017 Semenov
9675255 June 2017 Semenov
9724010 August 2017 Semenov
9924873 March 2018 Semenov
10492700 December 2019 Semenov
10921361 February 2021 Semenov
10980421 April 2021 Semenov
10980435 April 2021 Semenov
20020017905 February 2002 Conti
20020168317 November 2002 Daighighian et al.
20020191744 December 2002 Mirabelle
20030018244 January 2003 Haddad et al.
20030088180 May 2003 Van Veen et al.
20030090276 May 2003 Weide et al.
20040015087 January 2004 Boric-Lubecke et al.
20040123667 July 2004 McGrath
20040174948 September 2004 Kojima et al.
20040220465 November 2004 Cafarella
20050119569 June 2005 Ohtake
20050135560 June 2005 Dafni et al.
20050203387 September 2005 Godshalk et al.
20060133564 June 2006 Langan et al.
20060247531 November 2006 Pogue et al.
20060276714 December 2006 Holt et al.
20070025514 February 2007 Lawaczeck
20070238957 October 2007 Yared
20080319437 December 2008 Turner et al.
20090015832 January 2009 Popovic et al.
20090292195 November 2009 Boyden et al.
20100010340 January 2010 Godavarty et al.
20100067770 March 2010 Persson et al.
20100174179 July 2010 Persson et al.
20110022325 January 2011 Craddock et al.
20110263961 October 2011 Craddock et al.
20110295102 December 2011 Lakkis et al.
20120010493 January 2012 Semenov
20120083683 April 2012 Kuwabara
20120083690 April 2012 Semenov
20120172954 July 2012 Zastrow et al.
20120179037 July 2012 Halmann
20120190977 July 2012 Persson et al.
20130002264 January 2013 Gaerber
20130190599 July 2013 Wyeth et al.
20130257426 October 2013 Feiweier et al.
20140024917 January 2014 McMahon et al.
20140155740 June 2014 Semenov
20140275944 September 2014 Semenov
20140276012 September 2014 Semenov
20140378812 December 2014 Saroka et al.
20150117596 April 2015 Cao
20150257648 September 2015 Semenov
20150257649 September 2015 Semenov
20150342472 December 2015 Semenov
20160256109 September 2016 Semenov
20160262623 September 2016 Semenov
20160324489 November 2016 Crawford et al.
20160345856 December 2016 Semenov
20170127946 May 2017 Levinson et al.
20170273563 September 2017 Semenov
20180231594 August 2018 Semenov
20180235486 August 2018 Semenov
20180344165 December 2018 Semenov
20190313937 October 2019 Fhager et al.
20210082160 March 2021 Abbosh et al.
20210228085 July 2021 Semenov
20210236008 August 2021 Semenov
2936145 June 2021
102132149 July 2011
108366771 August 2018
3361955 August 2018
3361955 September 2020
2922464 September 2021
241600 April 2021
258655 September 2021
2449729 May 2012
9532665 December 1995
199852464 November 1998
200015109 March 2000
00/64343 November 2000
2005115235 December 2005
2007136334 November 2007
2008002251 January 2008
2010100649 September 2010
2011009945 January 2011
2011156810 December 2011
2011156810 December 2011
2013005134 January 2013
2013005134 January 2013
2016036946 March 2016
2017066731 April 2017
2017066731 May 2018
2018127434 July 2018
2019094877 May 2019
2019224266 November 2019






































Other References: Semenov, Bulyshev, Souvorov, Svenson, Sizov, Borisov, Posukh, Kozlov, Nazarov, and Tatsis, “Microwave Tomography: Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of the Iteration Reconstruction” Feb. 1998, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 135-141. (Year: 1998). cited by examiner
Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Letter Regarding Common Patent Application(s), dated Feb. 24, 2021. cited by applicant
Mariappan et.al., Magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction for high-resolution bioimepedance imaging through vector source reconstruction under the static field of MRI magnet., Med Phys. Feb. 2014; 41(2): 022902. cited by applicant
Abubakar, A.; van den Berg, P.M. and Mallorqui, J.J. (2002). “Imaging of biomedical data using a multiplicative regularized contrast source inversion method”, IEEE Transactions of Microwave Theory and Techniques 50 : 1761-1771. (10 pages). cited by applicant
Bulyshev, A.E.; Souvorov, A.E.; Semenov, S. Y. ; Posukh, V.G. and Sizov, Y. E. (2004). “Three-dimensional vector microwave tomography: theory and computational experiments”, Inverse Problems 20 : 1239. cited by applicant
Bulyshev, A.E.; Souvorov, A. E.; Semenov, S.Y.; Svenson, R.H.; Nazarov, A.G.; Sizov, Y.E. and Tatsis, G. P. (2000) “Three-dimensional microwave tomography. Theory and computer experiments in scalar approximation”, Inverse Problems 16 : 863. cited by applicant
Chew, W. C. and Wang, Y. M. (1990). “Reconstruction of two-dimensional permittivity distribution using the distorted Born iterative method”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 9 : 218-225. (8 pages). cited by applicant
Devaney, A. J. (1992). Current research topics in diffraction tomography. In: Bertero, M. & Pike, E. (Ed.), Inverse Problems in Scattering and Imaging, Adam Hilger, New York. cited by applicant
Fear, Elise C., et al. “Confocal microwave imaging for breast cancer detection: Localization of tumors in three dimensions.” IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering 49.8 (2002): 812-822. (11 pages). cited by applicant
Harada, H.; Wall, D. J. N.; Takenaka, T. and Tanaka, M. (1995). “Conjugate gradient method applied to inverse scattering problem”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 43 : 784-792. (9 pages). cited by applicant
Hawley, M.S., et al., “Microwave Imaging of Tissue Blood Content Changes,” Journal of Biomedical Engineering (1991), pp. 197-202, vol. 13, No. 3, published by Butterworth-Heinermann for BES (6 pages). cited by applicant
Igney et al. “Design and performance of a planar-array MIT system with normal sensor alignment: Planar-array MIT system with normal sensor alignment”, Physiological Measurement, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, GB, vol. 26, No. 2, Apr. 1, 2005 (Apr. 1, 2005), pp. S263-S278, (16 pages). cited by applicant
Joachimowicz, N.; Mallorqui, J. J.; Bolomey, J. C. and Broquets, A. (1998). “Convergence and stability assessment of Newton-Kantorovich reconstruction algorithms for microwave tomography,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 17 : 562-570. (9 pages). cited by applicant
Jofre, L., et al., “Medical Imaging with a Microwave Tomographic Scanner,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (Mar. 1990), pp. 303-312, vol. 37, No. 3 (10 pages). cited by applicant
Kleinman, R. and den Berg, P. (1992). “A modified gradient method for two-dimensional problems in tomography,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 42 : 17-35. cited by applicant
Lobel, P.; Kleinman, R. E.; Pichot, C.; Blanc-Feraud, L. and Barlaud, M. (1996). “Conjugate-Gradient Method for Soliving Inverse Scattering with Experimental Data”, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 38 : 48. cited by applicant
Meaney, P. M.; Paulsen, K. D.; Hartov, A. and Crane, R. K. (1996). “Microwave imaging for tissue assessment: initial evaluation in multitarget tissue-equivalent phantoms”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 43 : 878-890. (12 pages). cited by applicant
Yongjie Jessica Zhang et al.: “A New Method to Improve Quality of Reconstructed Images in Tomography”. In: “Computational Modeling of Objects Presented in Images. Fundamentals, Methods, and Applications”. Jan. 1, 2014 (Jan. 1, 2014), Springer, USA, pp. 267-272. cited by applicant
Poltschak et al., “High precision realtime RF-measurement system for imaging of stroke”, 2017 47th European Microwave Conference (EUMC), European Microwave Association, Oct. 10, 2017, pp. 864-867, (4 pages). cited by applicant
Rompelman, O., and H.H. Ros, Coherent averaging technique: A tutorial review Part 1 Noise reduction and the equivalent filter, Journal of biomedical engineering 8, No. 1 (1986): 24-29. cited by applicant
Semenov, S.Y.; Posukh, V.G.; Bulyshev, A. E.; Williams, T.; Clark, P.; Sizov, Y.E.; Souvorov, A. E.; Voinov, B.A.: “Development of Microwave Tomography for Functional Cardiac Imaging.” Biomedical Imaging: Macro to Nano, 2004. IEEE International Symposium on Arlington, VA, USA IEEE Apr. 15, 2004 (Apr. 15, 2004), pp. 1351-1353, XP010774114, DOI: 10.1109/ISBI.2004.1398797 ISBN: 978-0-7803-8389-0 (3 pages). cited by applicant
Semenov, S.Y.; Simonova, G. I.; Starostin, A.N.; Taran, M.G.; Souvorov, A.E.; Bulyshev, A.E. Svenson, R.H.; Nazarov, A.G.; Sizov, Y.E.,; Posukh, V.G.; Pavlovsky, A. and Tatsis G.P. (2001) “Dielectrical Model of Cellular Structures in Radio Frequency and Microwave Spectrum. Electrically Interacting Versus Noninteracting Cells.” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 29. pp. 427-435. (8 pages). cited by applicant
Semenov, S. Y.; Bulyshev, A. E.; Abubakar, A.; Posukh, V. G.; Sizov, Y. E.; Souvorov, A. E.; van den Berg, P. M. and Williams, T. C. (2005). Microwave-tomographic imaging of the high dielectric-contrast objects using different imagereconstruction approaches, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 53 : 2284-2294. (10 pages). cited by applicant
Semenov, S. Y.; Bulyshev, A. E.; Souvorov, A. E.; Svenson, R. H.; Sizov, Y. E.; Vorisov, V. Y.; Posukh, V. G.; Kozlov, I. M.; Nazarov, A. G. and Tatsis, G. P. (1998). Microwave tomography: theoretical and experimental investigation of the iteration reconstruction algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 46 : 133-141. (9 pages). cited by applicant
Semenov, S. Y.; Bulyshev, A. E.; Posukh, V. G.; Sizov, Y. E.; Williams, T. C. and Souvorov, A. E. (2003). Microwave Tomography for Detection/Imaging of Myocardial Infarction. I. Excised Canine Hearts, Annals of Biomedical Engineering 31 : 262-270. (9 pages). cited by applicant
Semenov, S., et al., “Microwave Tomography of Extremities: 1. Dedicated 2D System and Physiological Signatures,” Physics in Medicine and Biology (2011), pp. 2005-2017, vol. 56, No. 7, published by Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, United Kingdom (13 pages). cited by applicant
Semenov, S.Y.: “Microwave tomography: review of the progress towards clinical applications”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, vol. 2009, No. 367, Dec. 31, 2009. pp. 3021-3042, XP002661164. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2009.0092 *the whole document*. (22 pages). cited by applicant
Semenov, S.Y.; Kellam, J.; Althausen, P.; Williams, T.; Abubakar, A.; Bulyshev, A.; Sizov, Y. (2007) “Microwave tomography for functional imaging of extremity soft tissues: feasibility assessment.” Physics in Medicine and Biology, doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/18/015. (15 pages). cited by applicant
Semenov, S.Y. et al.: “Myocardial ischemia and infarction can be detected by microwave spectroscopy. II. Biophysical reconstruction”, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1996. Bridging Disciplines for Biomedicine., 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Amsterdam, Netherlands Oct. 31-Nov. 3, NY, NY, IEEE vol. 4 Oct. 31, 1996 pp. 1363-1364, XP010261997, DOI: 10.1109/EMBS. 1996.647455 ISBN:978-0-7803-3811-1. cited by applicant
Souvorov, A. E.; Bulyshev, A. E.; Semenov, S. Y.; Svenson, R. H.; Nazarov, A. G.; Sizov, Y. E. and Tatsis, G. P. (1998). Microwave tomography: a two-dimensional Newton iterative scheme, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 46 : 1654-1659. (6 pages). cited by applicant
Yaniv, Ziv, et al. “Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment.” Medical physics 36.3 (2009): 876-892 (17 pages). cited by applicant
Zhu et al.: “An improved back-projection algorithm for electrical impedance tomography”, Automation Congress, 2008. WAC 2008. World, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Sep. 28, 2008 (Sep. 28, 2008), pp. 1-4, XP031371153, ISBN: 978-1-889335-38-4. cited by applicant
Zulkarnay et al., “Advancements in Transmitters and Sensors for Biological Tissue Imaging in Magnetic Induction Tomography”, Sensors, vol. 12, No. 12, Dec. 29, 2012, pp. 7126-7156, ( 20 pages). cited by applicant
“European Extended Search Report of the European Patent Office” in European Patent Application No. 16856382.3 for EMTensor GmbH, dated Apr. 24, 2019, 7 pages. cited by applicant
“Extended European Search Report,” European Patent Application No. 13856581.7, for EMTensor GmbH, et al., dated Aug. 25, 2016 (7 pages). cited by applicant
“International Preliminary Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” (ISA/US) in EMTENSOR GMBH, International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/063169, dated Jun. 6, 2019 (19 pages). cited by applicant
“International Preliminary Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” (ISA/US) in EMTENSOR GMBH, International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2016/057254, dated Apr. 26, 2018 (6 pages). cited by applicant
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” (ISA/US) in EMTENSOR GmbH, International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2016/057254, dated Jan. 12, 2017 (7 pages). cited by applicant
“Russian Search Report” of Federal Institute of Industrial Property (FIIP) in EMTENSOR GMBH, Russian Patent Application Serial No. 2018117885, dated Feb. 3, 2020 (4 pages). cited by applicant
Assistant Examiner: Liao, Christine Y
Primary Examiner: Breene, John E
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Tillman, Wright & Wolgin
Wright, James D.
Higgins, David R.
Přístupové číslo: edspgr.11892491
Databáze: USPTO Patent Grants
Popis
Abstrakt:An Electromagnetic Interference Pattern Recognition Tomography (EMIPRT) method for use in an image reconstruction system includes generating electromagnetic field data corresponding to an object in an imaging domain, via an electromagnetic tomography system, and using the generated electromagnetic field data, repeatedly, in recursive manner, forming an undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image based on the undisturbed electromagnetic interference image, recognizing electromagnetic interference patterns in the repeatedly formed disturbed electromagnetic interference images, and forming a superposition image by nullifying or diminishing the recognized electromagnetic interference patterns from the disturbed electromagnetic interference image. Forming a disturbed electromagnetic interference image is also based on an object factor that is a function of the differences between experimentally electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic fields calculated during the step of forming an undisturbed electromagnetic interference image. After each repeated step of forming a superposition image, the method also includes determining whether a convergence objective has been reached.