View in EDS

Sociodemographic characteristics and predictive factors of attrition: comparison in two final waves of a birth cohort study in Ecuador

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Sociodemographic characteristics and predictive factors of attrition: comparison in two final waves of a birth cohort study in Ecuador
Authors: Nataly Cadena, Alexis J. Handal, Fabián Muñoz, Fadya Orozco
Source: Frontiers in Reproductive Health, Vol 7 (2025)
Publisher Information: Frontiers Media S.A., 2025.
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: LCC:Reproduction
LCC:Medicine (General)
Subject Terms: attrition analysis, birth cohort, drop out, low and mid income countries, Ecuador (country), sociodemographic factors, Reproduction, QH471-489, Medicine (General), R5-920
Description: BackgroundBirth cohort studies are essential to investigate maternal and child health outcomes, yet they face persistent methodological challenges. A major concern is attrition, as participant loss over successive waves can compromise validity and introduce bias. These challenges are particularly acute in low- and middle-income countries, where socioeconomic inequalities and structural barriers further exacerbate participant loss and complicate long-term follow-up.ObjectiveThis paper compares attrition between participants who remained and those who dropped out of the birth cohort study, SEMILLA. We analyze reasons for drop out, and the sociodemographic characteristics and predictive factors associated with attrition.Material and methodsRecruitment occurred over 30 months. Events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and social conflicts between 2019 and 2022 affected the final follow-up. The baseline sample included 409 pregnant women, divided into two Final Waves (FW): FW1 completed participation up to the baby's 12 months (n = 115), and FW2 up to 18 months (n = 294). Dropouts were identified by miscarriage, loss to follow-up, voluntary withdrawal, or protocol non-compliance. Baseline variables included ethnicity, years of schooling, maternal occupational activity, and per capita income. Attrition was calculated for each criterion overall and by Final Wave. Fisher's Exact Test, Pearson's chi-square, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tested differences between participants and dropouts. Logistic regression identified predictors of attrition in each Final Wave. All analyses were conducted with 95% confidence.ResultsOf 409 participants, 94 dropped out: 19 in FW1 and 75 in FW2. The main reasons were protocol non-compliance (54%), voluntary withdrawal (21%), miscarriage (13%), and loss to follow-up (12%). In FW1, younger age was associated with attrition (p = 0.031), while in FW2, Mestiza ethnicity (p = 0.037) and lower income (p = 0.014) were significant. Logistic regression showed that older maternal age (OR = 0.87, p = 0.026) and higher income (OR = 0.99, p = 0.034) predicted lower attrition.ConclusionDropouts increased with longer follow-up, mainly due to time constraints. Age and income disparities significantly predicted continued participation. In contexts with socioeconomic challenges, these factors also affected protocol compliance. Findings underscore the importance of addressing socioeconomic determinants to strengthen the validity and sustainability of longitudinal studies in similar settings.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2673-3153
Relation: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frph.2025.1605182/full; https://doaj.org/toc/2673-3153
DOI: 10.3389/frph.2025.1605182
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/3d78991a5d4a43738ce1a4e1df274e82
Accession Number: edsdoj.3d78991a5d4a43738ce1a4e1df274e82
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
Description
Abstract:BackgroundBirth cohort studies are essential to investigate maternal and child health outcomes, yet they face persistent methodological challenges. A major concern is attrition, as participant loss over successive waves can compromise validity and introduce bias. These challenges are particularly acute in low- and middle-income countries, where socioeconomic inequalities and structural barriers further exacerbate participant loss and complicate long-term follow-up.ObjectiveThis paper compares attrition between participants who remained and those who dropped out of the birth cohort study, SEMILLA. We analyze reasons for drop out, and the sociodemographic characteristics and predictive factors associated with attrition.Material and methodsRecruitment occurred over 30 months. Events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and social conflicts between 2019 and 2022 affected the final follow-up. The baseline sample included 409 pregnant women, divided into two Final Waves (FW): FW1 completed participation up to the baby's 12 months (n = 115), and FW2 up to 18 months (n = 294). Dropouts were identified by miscarriage, loss to follow-up, voluntary withdrawal, or protocol non-compliance. Baseline variables included ethnicity, years of schooling, maternal occupational activity, and per capita income. Attrition was calculated for each criterion overall and by Final Wave. Fisher's Exact Test, Pearson's chi-square, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tested differences between participants and dropouts. Logistic regression identified predictors of attrition in each Final Wave. All analyses were conducted with 95% confidence.ResultsOf 409 participants, 94 dropped out: 19 in FW1 and 75 in FW2. The main reasons were protocol non-compliance (54%), voluntary withdrawal (21%), miscarriage (13%), and loss to follow-up (12%). In FW1, younger age was associated with attrition (p = 0.031), while in FW2, Mestiza ethnicity (p = 0.037) and lower income (p = 0.014) were significant. Logistic regression showed that older maternal age (OR = 0.87, p = 0.026) and higher income (OR = 0.99, p = 0.034) predicted lower attrition.ConclusionDropouts increased with longer follow-up, mainly due to time constraints. Age and income disparities significantly predicted continued participation. In contexts with socioeconomic challenges, these factors also affected protocol compliance. Findings underscore the importance of addressing socioeconomic determinants to strengthen the validity and sustainability of longitudinal studies in similar settings.
ISSN:26733153
DOI:10.3389/frph.2025.1605182