View in EDS

Exploring the social experiences, stigma and discrimination, faced by women with gestational diabetes: A collaborative qualitative study and item‐pool development

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Exploring the social experiences, stigma and discrimination, faced by women with gestational diabetes: A collaborative qualitative study and item‐pool development
Authors: E Holmes‐Truscott, Eloise Litterbach, C Arampatzi, C Calyx, JE Cherry, V Gilbert‐Morresi, A Williams, M Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz, H Teede, Jane Speight
Publication Year: 2025
Subject Terms: Biomedical and clinical sciences, Clinical sciences, Health sciences, Psychology, collaborative development, community involvement, diabetes stigma, gestational diabetes mellitus, psychosocial aspects, qualitative methods
Description: AimTo explore experiences of stigma related to gestational diabetes (GDM) among Australian women and collaboratively develop a comprehensive item pool to assess experienced and internalised GDM‐specific stigma.MethodsA GDM Lived Experience Advisory Group (G‐LEAG; n = 4) informed all aspects of a two‐phase qualitative research process. Phase 1 included semi‐structured online interviews with 20 women with current or recent GDM. Reflexive thematic analysis identified drivers and facilitators, markers, manifestations, impacts and protective mechanisms of GDM stigma. Findings informed the development of an item pool, debriefed and refined with a subset of 10 participants in Phase 2 interviews.ResultsAll participants perceived, experienced, anticipated and/or internalised GDM‐specific stigma. They perceived GDM‐specific stigma to be driven by stereotypes and blame, and facilitated by societal norms regarding motherhood and pregnancy, media messaging, as well as inflexible and inconsistent healthcare policies. They reported social, emotional and self care impacts, as well as perceived loss of autonomy in clinical care. They proposed potential protective mechanisms, including social and healthcare support, self‐belief and self‐compassion, and community awareness. In cognitive debriefing interviews, women reported that the draft items comprehensively covered their experiences of GDM‐specific stigma and offered suggestions for refinement, resulting in a 74‐item pool.ConclusionsFindings provide rich insights into the experiences and impacts of stigma among women with GDM in Australia and resulted in a co‐designed GDM‐specific stigma item pool. The item pool is ready for psychometric assessment and item reduction, which will enable future quantification of the occurrence, impacts and mechanisms of GDM‐specific stigma.
Document Type: article in journal/newspaper
Language: unknown
Relation: 10779/DRO/DU:30028189.v1; https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Exploring_the_social_experiences_stigma_and_discrimination_faced_by_women_with_gestational_diabetes_A_collaborative_qualitative_study_and_item_pool_development/30028189
Availability: https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Exploring_the_social_experiences_stigma_and_discrimination_faced_by_women_with_gestational_diabetes_A_collaborative_qualitative_study_and_item_pool_development/30028189
Rights: CC BY-NC 4.0
Accession Number: edsbas.C570C5
Database: BASE
Description
Abstract:AimTo explore experiences of stigma related to gestational diabetes (GDM) among Australian women and collaboratively develop a comprehensive item pool to assess experienced and internalised GDM‐specific stigma.MethodsA GDM Lived Experience Advisory Group (G‐LEAG; n = 4) informed all aspects of a two‐phase qualitative research process. Phase 1 included semi‐structured online interviews with 20 women with current or recent GDM. Reflexive thematic analysis identified drivers and facilitators, markers, manifestations, impacts and protective mechanisms of GDM stigma. Findings informed the development of an item pool, debriefed and refined with a subset of 10 participants in Phase 2 interviews.ResultsAll participants perceived, experienced, anticipated and/or internalised GDM‐specific stigma. They perceived GDM‐specific stigma to be driven by stereotypes and blame, and facilitated by societal norms regarding motherhood and pregnancy, media messaging, as well as inflexible and inconsistent healthcare policies. They reported social, emotional and self care impacts, as well as perceived loss of autonomy in clinical care. They proposed potential protective mechanisms, including social and healthcare support, self‐belief and self‐compassion, and community awareness. In cognitive debriefing interviews, women reported that the draft items comprehensively covered their experiences of GDM‐specific stigma and offered suggestions for refinement, resulting in a 74‐item pool.ConclusionsFindings provide rich insights into the experiences and impacts of stigma among women with GDM in Australia and resulted in a co‐designed GDM‐specific stigma item pool. The item pool is ready for psychometric assessment and item reduction, which will enable future quantification of the occurrence, impacts and mechanisms of GDM‐specific stigma.