Restraining Overconfident CEOs Through Credit Ratings

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Restraining Overconfident CEOs Through Credit Ratings
Autoři: Khoo, Shee‐Yee, Verousis, Thanos, Vu, Huong, Klusak, Patrycja
Informace o vydavateli: Wiley
//doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12557
Rok vydání: 2025
Sbírka: Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Témata: 3502 Banking, Finance and Investment, 35 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services, 3507 Strategy, Management and Organisational Behaviour
Popis: Publication status: Published ; Funder: The authors received no specific funding for this work. ; ABSTRACT Overconfident CEOs significantly reduce their acquisition activity when facing a higher risk of a credit rating downgrade, possibly because credit ratings impact their ability to access external financing. Investment‐grade firms managed by overconfident CEOs that are placed on a negative rating outlook reduce their acquisitiveness by approximately 16 percentage points. Our findings offer a novel perspective on the role of credit rating agencies as an external control mechanism, constraining overconfident managers from pursuing value‐destroying acquisitions. Our findings survive a battery of robustness checks, including endogeneity, controlling for internal control mechanisms and market reaction tests.
Druh dokumentu: article in journal/newspaper
Popis souboru: application/pdf; text/xml
Jazyk: English
Relation: eufm12557; https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/384011
Dostupnost: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/384011
Přístupové číslo: edsbas.A376428
Databáze: BASE
Popis
Abstrakt:Publication status: Published ; Funder: The authors received no specific funding for this work. ; ABSTRACT Overconfident CEOs significantly reduce their acquisition activity when facing a higher risk of a credit rating downgrade, possibly because credit ratings impact their ability to access external financing. Investment‐grade firms managed by overconfident CEOs that are placed on a negative rating outlook reduce their acquisitiveness by approximately 16 percentage points. Our findings offer a novel perspective on the role of credit rating agencies as an external control mechanism, constraining overconfident managers from pursuing value‐destroying acquisitions. Our findings survive a battery of robustness checks, including endogeneity, controlling for internal control mechanisms and market reaction tests.