An Evaluation of Safety-Critical Java on a Java Processor
Saved in:
| Title: | An Evaluation of Safety-Critical Java on a Java Processor |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Juan Ricardo Rios, Martin Schoeberl |
| Contributors: | The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives |
| Source: | http://www.jopdesign.com/doc/jopscjeval.pdf. |
| Collection: | CiteSeerX |
| Subject Terms: | Index Terms—Real-time systems, Embedded systems, Java, Safety-critical systems, Safety-critical Java, Java processor |
| Description: | —The safety-critical Java (SCJ) specification provides a restricted set of the Java language intended for applications that require certification. In order to test the specification, implementations are emerging and the need to evaluate those implementations in a systematic way is becoming important. In this paper we evaluate our SCJ implementation which is based on the Java Optimized Processor JOP and we measure different performance and timeliness criteria relevant to hard real-time systems. Our implementation targets Level 0 and Level 1 of the specification and to test it we use a series of micro benchmarks, an application-based benchmark, and a reduced set of a SCJ technology compatibility kit. We evaluate the accuracy of periods, linear-time memory allocation, aperiodic event handling, dispatch latency for interrupts, context switch preemption latency, and synchronization. |
| Document Type: | text |
| File Description: | application/pdf |
| Language: | English |
| Relation: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.698.3801; http://www.jopdesign.com/doc/jopscjeval.pdf |
| Availability: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.698.3801 http://www.jopdesign.com/doc/jopscjeval.pdf |
| Rights: | Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. |
| Accession Number: | edsbas.7B41E81F |
| Database: | BASE |
| Abstract: | —The safety-critical Java (SCJ) specification provides a restricted set of the Java language intended for applications that require certification. In order to test the specification, implementations are emerging and the need to evaluate those implementations in a systematic way is becoming important. In this paper we evaluate our SCJ implementation which is based on the Java Optimized Processor JOP and we measure different performance and timeliness criteria relevant to hard real-time systems. Our implementation targets Level 0 and Level 1 of the specification and to test it we use a series of micro benchmarks, an application-based benchmark, and a reduced set of a SCJ technology compatibility kit. We evaluate the accuracy of periods, linear-time memory allocation, aperiodic event handling, dispatch latency for interrupts, context switch preemption latency, and synchronization. |
|---|
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science