Retail loyalty schemes : a practical theological response to surveillance capitalism and its construction of the flawed prosumer
Saved in:
| Title: | Retail loyalty schemes : a practical theological response to surveillance capitalism and its construction of the flawed prosumer |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Stoddart, Eric |
| Contributors: | University of St Andrews.School of Divinity, University of St Andrews.Centre for the Study of Religion and Politics |
| Publication Year: | 2025 |
| Collection: | University of St Andrews: Digital Research Repository |
| Subject Terms: | Retail loyalty schemes, Prosumers, Solidarity, Catholic Social Teaching, Digital humanism, Theology of hope, Moltmann, T-NDAS |
| Description: | This paper argues that retail loyalty schemes lie at the intersection of three sites of struggle: datafication, competitiveness, and commodification. It is where these overlap that the production of data-doubles (inferred categories into which individuals are placed), digital self-interest, and neoliberal (finance-dominated) economics, coalesce in surveillance capitalism. By re-deploying Bauman’s notion of the flawed consumer, a category of ‘flawed prosumer’ is used in relation to Stoddart’s analytical device of the common gaze, a preferential optic for those who are digitally poor. It is proposed that Christians contribute to public debate three theological themes: solidarity, the universal destination of goods, and the shadow of the cross cast from the future upon the present. It draws upon Kathryn Tanner’s theological critique of financed-dominated economics, Roman Catholic Social Teaching, and Jürgen Moltmann’s theology of hope to contribute to the public debates promoted by Shoshana Zuboff on surveillance capitalism, Christian Fuchs on digital humanism, and George Monbiot on ‘the commons’. The aim is not to adjudicate a ‘Christian position’ on retail loyalty schemes but rather to argue that by giving attention to those who are excluded, better, more humane, digital societies may be imagined in which ‘flawed prosumer’ is a token of honourable subversion. ; Peer reviewed |
| Document Type: | article in journal/newspaper |
| File Description: | application/pdf |
| Language: | English |
| Relation: | Practical Theology; 309833623; 105016766868; https://hdl.handle.net/10023/32853 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/1756073X.2025.2530817 |
| Availability: | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/32853 https://doi.org/10.1080/1756073X.2025.2530817 |
| Rights: | Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
| Accession Number: | edsbas.6B25A0DD |
| Database: | BASE |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | This paper argues that retail loyalty schemes lie at the intersection of three sites of struggle: datafication, competitiveness, and commodification. It is where these overlap that the production of data-doubles (inferred categories into which individuals are placed), digital self-interest, and neoliberal (finance-dominated) economics, coalesce in surveillance capitalism. By re-deploying Bauman’s notion of the flawed consumer, a category of ‘flawed prosumer’ is used in relation to Stoddart’s analytical device of the common gaze, a preferential optic for those who are digitally poor. It is proposed that Christians contribute to public debate three theological themes: solidarity, the universal destination of goods, and the shadow of the cross cast from the future upon the present. It draws upon Kathryn Tanner’s theological critique of financed-dominated economics, Roman Catholic Social Teaching, and Jürgen Moltmann’s theology of hope to contribute to the public debates promoted by Shoshana Zuboff on surveillance capitalism, Christian Fuchs on digital humanism, and George Monbiot on ‘the commons’. The aim is not to adjudicate a ‘Christian position’ on retail loyalty schemes but rather to argue that by giving attention to those who are excluded, better, more humane, digital societies may be imagined in which ‘flawed prosumer’ is a token of honourable subversion. ; Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1080/1756073X.2025.2530817 |