Psychometric properties of burnout measures: a systematic review
Saved in:
| Title: | Psychometric properties of burnout measures: a systematic review |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Shoman, Y., Marca, S.C., Bianchi, R., Godderis, L., van der Molen, H.F., Guseva Canu, I. |
| Source: | ISSN:2045-7960 ; ISSN:2045-7979 ; Epidemiology And Psychiatric Sciences, vol. 30, Art.No. PII S2045796020001134. |
| Publisher Information: | Cambridge University Press |
| Publication Year: | 2021 |
| Subject Terms: | Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Psychiatry, Occupational Burnout, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM), psychometric properties, validity, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS, CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY, FACTORIAL VALIDITY, EDUCATORS SURVEY, INVENTORY, VALIDATION, OUTCOMES, QUALITY, SAMPLE, INSTRUMENTS, Burnout, Professional, Psychological, Humans, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Surveys and Questionnaires, 4202 Epidemiology, 4203 Health services and systems, 5205 Social and personality psychology |
| Description: | AIMS: Occupational Burnout (OB) is currently measured through several Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and some of them have become widely used in occupational health research and practice. We, therefore, aimed to review and grade the psychometric validity of the five OB PROMs considered as valid for OB measure in mental health professionals (the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the Pines' Burnout Measure (BM), the Psychologist Burnout Inventory (PBI), the OLdenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI)). METHODS: We conducted systematic literature searches in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and EMBASE databases. We reviewed studies published between January 1980 and September 2018 following a methodological framework, in which each step of PROM validation, the reference method, analytical technics and result interpretation criteria were assessed. Using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments we evaluated the risk of bias in studies assessing content and criterion validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypotheses testing and responsiveness of each PROM. Finally, we assessed the level of evidence for the validity of each PROM using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We identified 6541 studies, 19 of which were included for review. Fifteen studies dealt with MBI whereas BM, PBI, OLBI and CBI were each examined in only one study. OLBI had the most complete validation, followed by CBI, MBI, BM and PBI, respectively. When examining the result interpretation correctness, the strongest disagreement was observed for MBI (27% of results), BM (25%) and CBI (17%). There was no disagreement regarding PBI and OLBI. For OLBI and CBI, the quality of evidence for sufficient content validity, the crucial psychometric property, was moderate; for MBI, BM and PBI, it was very low. CONCLUSION: To be validly and reliably used in medical research and practice, PROM should exhibit robust psychometric properties. Among the five ... |
| Document Type: | article in journal/newspaper |
| File Description: | application/pdf |
| Language: | English |
| Relation: | https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/20.500.12942/692438; https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020001134; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33436137 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S2045796020001134 |
| Availability: | https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/20.500.12942/692438 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12942/692438 https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/9f91fea7-38e7-4c91-b072-7823dbda62ca https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020001134 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33436137 |
| Rights: | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; public ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| Accession Number: | edsbas.51DBE056 |
| Database: | BASE |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | AIMS: Occupational Burnout (OB) is currently measured through several Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and some of them have become widely used in occupational health research and practice. We, therefore, aimed to review and grade the psychometric validity of the five OB PROMs considered as valid for OB measure in mental health professionals (the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the Pines' Burnout Measure (BM), the Psychologist Burnout Inventory (PBI), the OLdenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI)). METHODS: We conducted systematic literature searches in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and EMBASE databases. We reviewed studies published between January 1980 and September 2018 following a methodological framework, in which each step of PROM validation, the reference method, analytical technics and result interpretation criteria were assessed. Using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments we evaluated the risk of bias in studies assessing content and criterion validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypotheses testing and responsiveness of each PROM. Finally, we assessed the level of evidence for the validity of each PROM using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We identified 6541 studies, 19 of which were included for review. Fifteen studies dealt with MBI whereas BM, PBI, OLBI and CBI were each examined in only one study. OLBI had the most complete validation, followed by CBI, MBI, BM and PBI, respectively. When examining the result interpretation correctness, the strongest disagreement was observed for MBI (27% of results), BM (25%) and CBI (17%). There was no disagreement regarding PBI and OLBI. For OLBI and CBI, the quality of evidence for sufficient content validity, the crucial psychometric property, was moderate; for MBI, BM and PBI, it was very low. CONCLUSION: To be validly and reliably used in medical research and practice, PROM should exhibit robust psychometric properties. Among the five ... |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1017/S2045796020001134 |