Risk Assessment of Urban Gas Pipeline Based on Different Unknown Measure Functions

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Risk Assessment of Urban Gas Pipeline Based on Different Unknown Measure Functions
Autoren: Sheng, Kai, Lai, Xiaolin, Chen, Yong, Jiang, Juncheng, Zhou*, Lin
Quelle: Tehnički vjesnik ; ISSN 1848-6339 (Online) ; ISSN 1330-3651 (Print) ; ISSN-L 1330-3651 ; Volume 28 ; Issue 5
Verlagsinformationen: University of Slavonski Brod, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Information Technology Osijek
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Osijek
Publikationsjahr: 2021
Bestand: Hrčak - Portal of scientific journals of Croatia / Portal znanstvenih časopisa Republike Hrvatske
Schlagwörter: credible degree recognition criteria, risk assessment, unascertained measure, unknown measure function, urban gas pipeline
Beschreibung: Several risk factors threaten the safety of urban gas pipeline. How to effectively identify various risk factors affecting urban gas pipeline and put forward scientific risk assessment method is the focus in the field of urban safety research. To explore the uncertain factors in the process of gas pipeline risk assessment, and propose a practical assessment method, a three-layer index system for the risk assessment of urban gas pipeline was established using unascertained measure theory, which included 5 first-class evaluation factors and 34 second-class evaluation indexes. Four unascertained measure models (linear, parabolic, exponential and sinusoidal) were constructed, and the unascertained measure values of each evaluation index under four unknown measure function models were calculated. The weight of evaluation factors was determined by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and the confidence criterion was used for discriminant evaluation. Results demonstrate that the risk assessment models constructed with different measurement functions can effectively reduce the uncertainty of urban gas pipeline risk assessment, but for the same object, the risk level of the linear measurement model in 4# pipeline is lower than other measurement functions, and the risk level of sinusoidal measurement model in 8# pipeline is higher than other measurement functions. Therefore, considering the evaluation results under different measure functions and focusing on monitoring objects with different results is necessary when using unascertained measure theory for risk assessment. The conclusions obtained from this study clarify the application conditions of unascertained measure theory in urban gas pipeline risk assessment, which helps to reduce the uncertainty in the assessment process and improve the accuracy of the assessment results.
Publikationsart: article in journal/newspaper
Dateibeschreibung: application/pdf
Sprache: English
Relation: https://hrcak.srce.hr/261337
DOI: 10.17559/TV-20201021110548
Verfügbarkeit: https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20201021110548
https://hrcak.srce.hr/261337
https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/380235
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; TEHNIČKI VJESNIK - TECHNICAL GAZETTE is an Open Access journal. All content is made freely available. Users are allowed to copy and redistribute, and alter, transform, or build upon the material as long as they attribute the source in an appropriate manner.
Dokumentencode: edsbas.46989131
Datenbank: BASE
Beschreibung
Abstract:Several risk factors threaten the safety of urban gas pipeline. How to effectively identify various risk factors affecting urban gas pipeline and put forward scientific risk assessment method is the focus in the field of urban safety research. To explore the uncertain factors in the process of gas pipeline risk assessment, and propose a practical assessment method, a three-layer index system for the risk assessment of urban gas pipeline was established using unascertained measure theory, which included 5 first-class evaluation factors and 34 second-class evaluation indexes. Four unascertained measure models (linear, parabolic, exponential and sinusoidal) were constructed, and the unascertained measure values of each evaluation index under four unknown measure function models were calculated. The weight of evaluation factors was determined by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and the confidence criterion was used for discriminant evaluation. Results demonstrate that the risk assessment models constructed with different measurement functions can effectively reduce the uncertainty of urban gas pipeline risk assessment, but for the same object, the risk level of the linear measurement model in 4# pipeline is lower than other measurement functions, and the risk level of sinusoidal measurement model in 8# pipeline is higher than other measurement functions. Therefore, considering the evaluation results under different measure functions and focusing on monitoring objects with different results is necessary when using unascertained measure theory for risk assessment. The conclusions obtained from this study clarify the application conditions of unascertained measure theory in urban gas pipeline risk assessment, which helps to reduce the uncertainty in the assessment process and improve the accuracy of the assessment results.
DOI:10.17559/TV-20201021110548