Hardness of Bounded Distance Decoding on Lattices in 𝓁_p Norms
Saved in:
| Title: | Hardness of Bounded Distance Decoding on Lattices in 𝓁_p Norms |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Bennett, Huck, Peikert, Chris |
| Contributors: | Huck Bennett and Chris Peikert |
| Publisher Information: | Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik |
| Publication Year: | 2020 |
| Collection: | DROPS - Dagstuhl Research Online Publication Server (Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz Center for Informatics ) |
| Subject Terms: | Lattices, Bounded Distance Decoding, NP-hardness, Fine-Grained Complexity |
| Description: | Bounded Distance Decoding BDD_{p,α} is the problem of decoding a lattice when the target point is promised to be within an α factor of the minimum distance of the lattice, in the 𝓁_p norm. We prove that BDD_{p, α} is NP-hard under randomized reductions where α → 1/2 as p → ∞ (and for α = 1/2 when p = ∞), thereby showing the hardness of decoding for distances approaching the unique-decoding radius for large p. We also show fine-grained hardness for BDD_{p,α}. For example, we prove that for all p ∈ [1,∞) ⧵ 2ℤ and constants C > 1, ε > 0, there is no 2^((1-ε)n/C)-time algorithm for BDD_{p,α} for some constant α (which approaches 1/2 as p → ∞), assuming the randomized Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). Moreover, essentially all of our results also hold (under analogous non-uniform assumptions) for BDD with preprocessing, in which unbounded precomputation can be applied to the lattice before the target is available. Compared to prior work on the hardness of BDD_{p,α} by Liu, Lyubashevsky, and Micciancio (APPROX-RANDOM 2008), our results improve the values of α for which the problem is known to be NP-hard for all p > p₁ ≈ 4.2773, and give the very first fine-grained hardness for BDD (in any norm). Our reductions rely on a special family of "locally dense" lattices in 𝓁_p norms, which we construct by modifying the integer-lattice sparsification technique of Aggarwal and Stephens-Davidowitz (STOC 2018). |
| Document Type: | article in journal/newspaper conference object |
| File Description: | application/pdf |
| Language: | English |
| Relation: | Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 169, 35th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2020); https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.36 |
| DOI: | 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.36 |
| Availability: | https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.36 https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-125881 https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.36 |
| Rights: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode |
| Accession Number: | edsbas.34C2C4F6 |
| Database: | BASE |
| Abstract: | Bounded Distance Decoding BDD_{p,α} is the problem of decoding a lattice when the target point is promised to be within an α factor of the minimum distance of the lattice, in the 𝓁_p norm. We prove that BDD_{p, α} is NP-hard under randomized reductions where α → 1/2 as p → ∞ (and for α = 1/2 when p = ∞), thereby showing the hardness of decoding for distances approaching the unique-decoding radius for large p. We also show fine-grained hardness for BDD_{p,α}. For example, we prove that for all p ∈ [1,∞) ⧵ 2ℤ and constants C > 1, ε > 0, there is no 2^((1-ε)n/C)-time algorithm for BDD_{p,α} for some constant α (which approaches 1/2 as p → ∞), assuming the randomized Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). Moreover, essentially all of our results also hold (under analogous non-uniform assumptions) for BDD with preprocessing, in which unbounded precomputation can be applied to the lattice before the target is available. Compared to prior work on the hardness of BDD_{p,α} by Liu, Lyubashevsky, and Micciancio (APPROX-RANDOM 2008), our results improve the values of α for which the problem is known to be NP-hard for all p > p₁ ≈ 4.2773, and give the very first fine-grained hardness for BDD (in any norm). Our reductions rely on a special family of "locally dense" lattices in 𝓁_p norms, which we construct by modifying the integer-lattice sparsification technique of Aggarwal and Stephens-Davidowitz (STOC 2018). |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.36 |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science