Zobrazit v EDS

Literature Reviews in HCI: A Review of Reviews

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Literature Reviews in HCI: A Review of Reviews
Autoři: Stefanidi, Evropi, Bentvelzen, Marit, Woźniak, Paweł W., Kosch, Thomas, Woźniak, Mikołaj P., Mildner, Thomas, Schneegass, Stefan, Müller, Heiko, Niess, Jasmin
Přispěvatelé: Sub Human-Centered Computing, Human-Centered Computing
Rok vydání: 2023
Témata: literature review, literature survey, meta review, meta-analysis, method, Software, Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
Popis: This paper analyses Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) literature reviews to provide a clear conceptual basis for authors, reviewers, and readers. HCI is multidisciplinary and various types of literature reviews exist, from systematic to critical reviews in the style of essays. Yet, there is insufficient consensus of what to expect of literature reviews in HCI. Thus, a shared understanding of literature reviews and clear terminology is needed to plan, evaluate, and use literature reviews, and to further improve review methodology. We analysed 189 literature reviews published at all SIGCHI conferences and ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) up until August 2022. We report on the main dimensions of variation: (i) contribution types and topics; and (ii) structure and methodologies applied. We identify gaps and trends to inform future meta work in HCI and provide a starting point on how to move towards a more comprehensive terminology system of literature reviews in HCI.
Druh dokumentu: book part
Popis souboru: application/pdf
Jazyk: English
Relation: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/428956
Dostupnost: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/428956
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Přístupové číslo: edsbas.1DF87D12
Databáze: BASE
Popis
Abstrakt:This paper analyses Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) literature reviews to provide a clear conceptual basis for authors, reviewers, and readers. HCI is multidisciplinary and various types of literature reviews exist, from systematic to critical reviews in the style of essays. Yet, there is insufficient consensus of what to expect of literature reviews in HCI. Thus, a shared understanding of literature reviews and clear terminology is needed to plan, evaluate, and use literature reviews, and to further improve review methodology. We analysed 189 literature reviews published at all SIGCHI conferences and ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) up until August 2022. We report on the main dimensions of variation: (i) contribution types and topics; and (ii) structure and methodologies applied. We identify gaps and trends to inform future meta work in HCI and provide a starting point on how to move towards a more comprehensive terminology system of literature reviews in HCI.