Literature Reviews in HCI: A Review of Reviews

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Literature Reviews in HCI: A Review of Reviews
Authors: Stefanidi, Evropi, Bentvelzen, Marit, Woźniak, Paweł W., Kosch, Thomas, Woźniak, Mikołaj P., Mildner, Thomas, Schneegass, Stefan, Müller, Heiko, Niess, Jasmin
Contributors: Sub Human-Centered Computing, Human-Centered Computing
Publication Year: 2023
Subject Terms: literature review, literature survey, meta review, meta-analysis, method, Software, Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
Description: This paper analyses Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) literature reviews to provide a clear conceptual basis for authors, reviewers, and readers. HCI is multidisciplinary and various types of literature reviews exist, from systematic to critical reviews in the style of essays. Yet, there is insufficient consensus of what to expect of literature reviews in HCI. Thus, a shared understanding of literature reviews and clear terminology is needed to plan, evaluate, and use literature reviews, and to further improve review methodology. We analysed 189 literature reviews published at all SIGCHI conferences and ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) up until August 2022. We report on the main dimensions of variation: (i) contribution types and topics; and (ii) structure and methodologies applied. We identify gaps and trends to inform future meta work in HCI and provide a starting point on how to move towards a more comprehensive terminology system of literature reviews in HCI.
Document Type: book part
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
Relation: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/428956
Availability: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/428956
Rights: info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Accession Number: edsbas.1DF87D12
Database: BASE
Description
Abstract:This paper analyses Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) literature reviews to provide a clear conceptual basis for authors, reviewers, and readers. HCI is multidisciplinary and various types of literature reviews exist, from systematic to critical reviews in the style of essays. Yet, there is insufficient consensus of what to expect of literature reviews in HCI. Thus, a shared understanding of literature reviews and clear terminology is needed to plan, evaluate, and use literature reviews, and to further improve review methodology. We analysed 189 literature reviews published at all SIGCHI conferences and ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) up until August 2022. We report on the main dimensions of variation: (i) contribution types and topics; and (ii) structure and methodologies applied. We identify gaps and trends to inform future meta work in HCI and provide a starting point on how to move towards a more comprehensive terminology system of literature reviews in HCI.