View in EDS

VENDOR SELECTION AND SUPPLY QUOTAS DETERMINATION BY USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS AND A NEW MULTI-OBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING METHOD

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: VENDOR SELECTION AND SUPPLY QUOTAS DETERMINATION BY USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS AND A NEW MULTI-OBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING METHOD
Authors: Babić, Zoran, Perić, Tunjo
Source: Interdisciplinary description of complex systems. 15(1):89-103
Publisher Information: 2017.
Publication Year: 2017
Subject Terms: multi-objective programming methods, analytic hierarchy process, vendor selection
Description: In this article, we propose a new methodology for solving the vendor selection and the supply quotas determination problem. The proposed methodology combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for determining the coefficients of the objective functions and a new multiple objective programming method based on the cooperative game theory for vendor selection and supply quotas determination. The proposed methodology is tested on the problem of flour purchase by a company that manufactures bakery products. For vendor selection and supply quotas determination we use three complex criteria: (1) purchasing costs, (2) product quality, and (3) vendor reliability.
Document Type: Article
ISSN: 1334-4684
DOI: 10.7906/15.1.7
Access URL: http://indecs.eu/2017/indecs2017-pp89-103.pdf
Accession Number: edsair.dris...01492..92542a82b8a5f60a958f653b6565fdeb
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
Abstract:In this article, we propose a new methodology for solving the vendor selection and the supply quotas determination problem. The proposed methodology combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for determining the coefficients of the objective functions and a new multiple objective programming method based on the cooperative game theory for vendor selection and supply quotas determination. The proposed methodology is tested on the problem of flour purchase by a company that manufactures bakery products. For vendor selection and supply quotas determination we use three complex criteria: (1) purchasing costs, (2) product quality, and (3) vendor reliability.
ISSN:13344684
DOI:10.7906/15.1.7