Simulating the Bandwagon: Competitive Location Strategies in Oligopolies

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Simulating the Bandwagon: Competitive Location Strategies in Oligopolies
Authors: Gwosdilin, Roman, Lindner, Thomas, Wolfesberger, Michael H.
Publisher Information: Academy of Management, 2025.
Publication Year: 2025
Subject Terms: Optimization, Competition, Entry barriers, Deep learning, International trade, Location strategies, Multinational firms, Liability of foreignness, Market sizes, Foreign market entries, Oligopolistic markets, Simulation model, Profitability, Size variation, Competitive location
Description: In oligopolistic market settings, multinational firms’ foreign market entries are considered competitive moves against a rival to maintain competitive parity. This paper introduces a simulation model to investigate the industry and firm-level factors determining the profit-optimizing degree of oligopolistic reaction. We simulate a world with two competing firms and use deep reinforcement learning to train these firms to find a profit-optimizing internationalization strategy for different industry-and firm-level parameters. Running 10,000 simulation scenarios with varying parameters, we find, on average, a considerably high degree of collocation between the two firms. Interestingly, while mid-to-high levels of collocation are driven by low competitive intensity, entry barriers, liabilities of foreignness, firm endowments, and high market size variation, edge cases of full collocation emerge under high competitive intensity and low first mover advantages and firm endowments. High entry barriers, liabilities of foreignness, and low market size variation drive the opposite case of full avoidance. By adding a competitive dynamics lens to our experiments and exploring the order and motivation of market entries in our simulation, we can deduce four competitive strategies (market-seeking, pre-emptive vs. defensive, destructive) leading to collocation.
Document Type: Part of book or chapter of book
Language: English
DOI: 10.5465/amproc.2025.254bp
Access URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10398/3bde1ca1-4c56-4b17-91ee-7e15a84fd25b
https://research.cbs.dk/en/publications/3bde1ca1-4c56-4b17-91ee-7e15a84fd25b
Rights: unspecified
Accession Number: edsair.dris...00958..bc4326e7b525a59c159e37ef01ad59d8
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
Abstract:In oligopolistic market settings, multinational firms’ foreign market entries are considered competitive moves against a rival to maintain competitive parity. This paper introduces a simulation model to investigate the industry and firm-level factors determining the profit-optimizing degree of oligopolistic reaction. We simulate a world with two competing firms and use deep reinforcement learning to train these firms to find a profit-optimizing internationalization strategy for different industry-and firm-level parameters. Running 10,000 simulation scenarios with varying parameters, we find, on average, a considerably high degree of collocation between the two firms. Interestingly, while mid-to-high levels of collocation are driven by low competitive intensity, entry barriers, liabilities of foreignness, firm endowments, and high market size variation, edge cases of full collocation emerge under high competitive intensity and low first mover advantages and firm endowments. High entry barriers, liabilities of foreignness, and low market size variation drive the opposite case of full avoidance. By adding a competitive dynamics lens to our experiments and exploring the order and motivation of market entries in our simulation, we can deduce four competitive strategies (market-seeking, pre-emptive vs. defensive, destructive) leading to collocation.
DOI:10.5465/amproc.2025.254bp