Fertility Decline in Rural China: A Comparative Analysis

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Fertility Decline in Rural China: A Comparative Analysis
Autoren: Yuesheng, W, Hua, H, Santos, GD, Harrell, S, Yingying, Z
Quelle: Journal of Family History. 36:15-36
Verlagsinformationen: SAGE Publications, 2010.
Publikationsjahr: 2010
Schlagwörter: Cross-Cultural Comparison, Rural Population, History, China, Social Behavior - History, Sexual Behavior, Spatial Behavior, Rural Health, Sexual Behavior - Ethnology - History - Physiology - Psychology, Anthropology, Cultural - Education - History, 0504 sociology, China - Ethnology, Social Change, Socioeconomic Factors - History, Birth Rate, Social Behavior, Anthropology, Cultural, 2. Zero hunger, Cultural - Education - History, History, 20Th Century, 05 social sciences, 1. No poverty, History, 20th Century, 0506 political science, Rural Health - History, Fertility, Socioeconomic Factors, Anthropology, Rural Population - History, Social Change - History, Birth Rate - Ethnology, 20Th Century
Beschreibung: Many models have been proposed to explain both the rapidity of China’s fertility decline after the 1960s and the differential timing of the decline in different places. In particular, scholars argue over whether deliberate policies of fertility control, institutional changes, or general modernization factors contribute most to changes in fertility behavior. Here the authors adopt an ethnographically grounded behavioral—institutional approach to analyze qualitative and quantitative data from three different rural settings: Xiaoshan County in Zhejiang (East China), Ci County in Hebei (North China), and Yingde County in Guangdong (South China). The authors show that no one set of factors explains the differential timing and rapidity of the fertility decline in the three areas; rather they must explain differential timing by a combination of differences in social—cultural environments (e.g., spread of education, reproductive ideologies, and gender relations) and politico-economic conditions (e.g., economic development, birth planning campaigns, and collective systems of labor organization) during the early phases of the fertility decline.
Publikationsart: Article
Sprache: English
ISSN: 1552-5473
0363-1990
DOI: 10.1177/0363199010388864
Zugangs-URL: https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3968812?pdf=render
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21319442
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0363199010388864
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21319442
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3968812
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:1301777
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0363199010388864
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21319442/
http://hdl.handle.net/10722/185508
Rights: URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license
Dokumentencode: edsair.doi.dedup.....fd54aaf374509e9ba838b21360b962b2
Datenbank: OpenAIRE
Beschreibung
Abstract:Many models have been proposed to explain both the rapidity of China’s fertility decline after the 1960s and the differential timing of the decline in different places. In particular, scholars argue over whether deliberate policies of fertility control, institutional changes, or general modernization factors contribute most to changes in fertility behavior. Here the authors adopt an ethnographically grounded behavioral—institutional approach to analyze qualitative and quantitative data from three different rural settings: Xiaoshan County in Zhejiang (East China), Ci County in Hebei (North China), and Yingde County in Guangdong (South China). The authors show that no one set of factors explains the differential timing and rapidity of the fertility decline in the three areas; rather they must explain differential timing by a combination of differences in social—cultural environments (e.g., spread of education, reproductive ideologies, and gender relations) and politico-economic conditions (e.g., economic development, birth planning campaigns, and collective systems of labor organization) during the early phases of the fertility decline.
ISSN:15525473
03631990
DOI:10.1177/0363199010388864