Considerations for pharmacoepidemiological analyses in the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Considerations for pharmacoepidemiological analyses in the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic
Autoři: Christian Fynbo Christiansen, Xavier Kurz, Anton Pottegård, Olaf H. Klungel, Nicholas Moore
Přispěvatelé: Afd Pharmacoepi & Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, PECP - Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology
Zdroj: Pottegård, A, Kurz, X, Moore, N, Christiansen, C F & Klungel, O 2020, ' Considerations for pharmacoepidemiological analyses in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic ', Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 825-831 . https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5029
Pottegård, A, Kurz, X, Moore, N, Christiansen, C F & Klungel, O 2020, 'Considerations for pharmacoepidemiological analyses in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic', Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 825-831. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5029
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Informace o vydavateli: Wiley, 2020.
Rok vydání: 2020
Témata: bias, pharmacoepidemiology, Time Factors, Epidemiology, Pneumonia, Viral, Data Collection/methods, Betacoronavirus, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Taverne, Humans, Pharmacology (medical), Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology, Pandemics, SARS-CoV-2, Data Collection, Pharmacoepidemiology, COVID-19, methodology, Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology, 3. Good health, Pharmacoepidemiology/organization & administration, Research Design, Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology, Coronavirus Infections
Popis: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has triggered several hypotheses regarding use of specific medicines and risk of infection as well as prognosis. Under these unique circumstances, rapid answers require quick engagement in data collection and analyses; however, appropriate design and conduct of pharmacoepidemiologic studies are needed to generate valid and reliable evidence. In this paper, endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology, we provide methodological considerations for the conduct of pharmacoepidemiological studies in relation to the pandemic across eight domains: (1) timeliness of evidence, including the need to prioritise some questions over others in the acute phase of the pandemic; (2) the need to align observational and interventional research on efficacy; (3) the specific challenges related to “real‐time epidemiology” during an ongoing pandemic; (4) what design to use to answer a specific question; (5) considerations on the definition of exposures; (6) what covariates to collect; (7) considerations on the definition of outcomes; and (8) the need for transparent reporting.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Review
Other literature type
Popis souboru: application/pdf
Jazyk: English
ISSN: 1099-1557
1053-8569
DOI: 10.1002/pds.5029
Přístupová URL adresa: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32369865
https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/da/publications/e9a2b199-45f6-48cb-aeed-e6ccd610d9e6
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/410829
https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/edcaadf1-508a-4302-b823-c5d5e77ab0a6
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084617176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5029
Rights: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
taverne
Wiley TDM
Přístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....fbd970aec6ac8499b4d18668eb842d59
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has triggered several hypotheses regarding use of specific medicines and risk of infection as well as prognosis. Under these unique circumstances, rapid answers require quick engagement in data collection and analyses; however, appropriate design and conduct of pharmacoepidemiologic studies are needed to generate valid and reliable evidence. In this paper, endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology, we provide methodological considerations for the conduct of pharmacoepidemiological studies in relation to the pandemic across eight domains: (1) timeliness of evidence, including the need to prioritise some questions over others in the acute phase of the pandemic; (2) the need to align observational and interventional research on efficacy; (3) the specific challenges related to “real‐time epidemiology” during an ongoing pandemic; (4) what design to use to answer a specific question; (5) considerations on the definition of exposures; (6) what covariates to collect; (7) considerations on the definition of outcomes; and (8) the need for transparent reporting.
ISSN:10991557
10538569
DOI:10.1002/pds.5029