High revision rate of metal-backed glenoid component and impact on the overall revision rate of stemless total shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort study from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: High revision rate of metal-backed glenoid component and impact on the overall revision rate of stemless total shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort study from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry
Autoři: Marc R K Nyring, Bo S Olsen, Steen L Jensen, Jeppe V Rasmussen
Zdroj: Acta Orthop
Acta Orthopaedica, Vol 95 (2024)
Nyring, M R K, Olsen, B S, Jensen, S L & Rasmussen, J V 2024, 'High revision rate of metal-backed glenoid component and impact on the overall revision rate of stemless total shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort study from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry', Acta Orthopaedica, vol. 95, pp. 386-391. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41014
Informace o vydavateli: MJS Publishing, Medical Journals Sweden AB, 2024.
Rok vydání: 2024
Témata: Osteoarthrosis, Reoperation, Male, Shoulder, Denmark, Prosthesis Design, Article, Arthroplasty, Cohort Studies, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Osteoarthritis, Humans, Osteoarthritis/surgery, Registries, Shoulder Joint/surgery, Aged, Orthopedic surgery, Aged, 80 and over, Shoulder Joint, Shoulder Prosthesis, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder/methods, Middle Aged, Denmark/epidemiology, Prosthesis Failure, Reoperation/statistics & numerical data, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder, Metals, Female, RD701-811
Popis: Background and purpose: There is controversy regarding the results of stemmed and stemless total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) used for osteoarthritis. Therefore, we aimed to compare revision rates of stemmed and stemless TSA and to examine the impact of metal-backed glenoid components.Methods: We included all patients reported to the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Register from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2022 with an anatomical TSA used for osteoarthritis. Primary outcome was revision (removal or exchange of components) for any reason.Results: 3,338 arthroplasties were included. The hazard ratio for revision of stemless TSA adjusted for age and sex was 1.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–2.78) with stemmed TSA as reference. When excluding all arthroplasties with a metal-backed glenoid component, the adjusted hazard ratio for revision of stemless TSA was 1.37 (CI 0.85–2.20). For the Eclipse stemless TSA system, the adjusted hazard ratio for revision of a metal-backed glenoid component was 8.75 (CI 2.40–31.9) with stemless Eclipse with an all-polyethylene glenoid component as reference.Conclusion: We showed that the risk of revision of stemless TSAs was increased and that it was related to their combination with metal-backed glenoid components.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Other literature type
Popis souboru: application/pdf
ISSN: 1745-3682
1745-3674
DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41014
Přístupová URL adresa: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39016083
https://doaj.org/article/72a8647b2bd8442cad78c7c3ab109ee6
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200234200&partnerID=8YFLogxK
https://vbn.aau.dk/da/publications/1189b109-410e-4489-8c27-637609ad9c4e
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41014
https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/files/737453436/Nyring_et_al._2024_._High_revision_rate_of_metal-backed_glenoid_component_and_impact_on_the_overall_revision_rate_of_stemless_total_shoulder_arthroplasty_-_a_cohort_study_from_the_Danish_Shoulder_Arthroplasty_Registry.pdf
Rights: CC BY
URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
Přístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....f820199af97ef7fa42f68da07c6b71ee
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:Background and purpose: There is controversy regarding the results of stemmed and stemless total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) used for osteoarthritis. Therefore, we aimed to compare revision rates of stemmed and stemless TSA and to examine the impact of metal-backed glenoid components.Methods: We included all patients reported to the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Register from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2022 with an anatomical TSA used for osteoarthritis. Primary outcome was revision (removal or exchange of components) for any reason.Results: 3,338 arthroplasties were included. The hazard ratio for revision of stemless TSA adjusted for age and sex was 1.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–2.78) with stemmed TSA as reference. When excluding all arthroplasties with a metal-backed glenoid component, the adjusted hazard ratio for revision of stemless TSA was 1.37 (CI 0.85–2.20). For the Eclipse stemless TSA system, the adjusted hazard ratio for revision of a metal-backed glenoid component was 8.75 (CI 2.40–31.9) with stemless Eclipse with an all-polyethylene glenoid component as reference.Conclusion: We showed that the risk of revision of stemless TSAs was increased and that it was related to their combination with metal-backed glenoid components.
ISSN:17453682
17453674
DOI:10.2340/17453674.2024.41014