Processing stereotypes: professionalism confirmed or disconfirmed by sector affiliation?: professionalism confirmed or disconfirmed by sector affiliation?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Processing stereotypes: professionalism confirmed or disconfirmed by sector affiliation?: professionalism confirmed or disconfirmed by sector affiliation?
Authors: Matthias Döring, Jurgen Willems
Contributors: Applied Economics
Source: International Public Management Journal. 26:221-239
Publisher Information: Informa UK Limited, 2021.
Publication Year: 2021
Subject Terms: 501021 Social psychology, 505027 Administrative studies, 502026 Human resource management, 605005 Audience research, 211903 Betriebswissenschaften, 211903 Science of management, 502026 Personalmanagement, 505027 Verwaltungslehre, 05 social sciences, 501021 Sozialpsychologie, 605005 Publikumsforschung, 0506 political science
Description: Public service stereotypes have been the subject of various studies in public administration research. However, the cognitive processes that form the basis of these stereotypes and the heuristics processing of stereotypical information, remain empirically vague. Starting from insights on the anti-public sector bias and representativeness heuristic, we apply an experimental vignette study (n = 1,412) in which we analyze how citizens process information on employees' sector affiliation. Furthermore, we integrate non-work role-referencing to test the stereotype confirmation assumption underlying the representativeness heuristic. Our results show that sector as well as non-work role-referencing influences perceived employee professionalism but has little effect on positive stereotype confirmation. However, our results do not confirm a congruity effect of consistent stereotypical information.
Document Type: Article
File Description: text
Language: English
ISSN: 1559-3169
1096-7494
DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2021.1971125
Access URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10967494.2021.1971125?needAccess=true
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10967494.2021.1971125
https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/en/publications/processing-stereotypes-professionalism-confirmed-or-disconfirmed-
https://epub.wu.ac.at/id/eprint/8307
https://research.wu.ac.at/de/publications/987b9ae3-018f-494f-9e59-e7f873af9557
https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2021.1971125
https://biblio.vub.ac.be/vubir/(67209af0-56fa-4e49-8ad0-0f68324c229a).html
Rights: CC BY NC ND
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....f71e46c8084e8e3419cd49dc157cef0b
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
Abstract:Public service stereotypes have been the subject of various studies in public administration research. However, the cognitive processes that form the basis of these stereotypes and the heuristics processing of stereotypical information, remain empirically vague. Starting from insights on the anti-public sector bias and representativeness heuristic, we apply an experimental vignette study (n = 1,412) in which we analyze how citizens process information on employees' sector affiliation. Furthermore, we integrate non-work role-referencing to test the stereotype confirmation assumption underlying the representativeness heuristic. Our results show that sector as well as non-work role-referencing influences perceived employee professionalism but has little effect on positive stereotype confirmation. However, our results do not confirm a congruity effect of consistent stereotypical information.
ISSN:15593169
10967494
DOI:10.1080/10967494.2021.1971125