Health policy counterpublics: Enacting collective resistances to US molecular HIV surveillance and cluster detection and response programs

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Health policy counterpublics: Enacting collective resistances to US molecular HIV surveillance and cluster detection and response programs
Authors: Stephen Molldrem, Anthony K J Smith
Source: Soc Stud Sci
Publisher Information: SAGE Publications, 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Subject Terms: anzsrc-for: 2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields, anzsrc-for: 4401 Anthropology, HIV Infections, publics, and research governance, policy studies, social theory, 8.3 Policy, anzsrc-for: 5002 History and philosophy of specific fields, social movements, Clinical Research, Behavioral and Social Science, Humans, anzsrc-for: 44 Human Society, Public Health Surveillance, 4407 Policy and Administration, anzsrc-for: 4410 Sociology, 44 Human Society, pathogen genomics, Health Policy, Politics, 3 Good Health and Well Being, Articles, Health Services, anzsrc-for: 4407 Policy and Administration, 16. Peace & justice, ethics, United States, anzsrc-for: 1608 Sociology, 3. Good health, Infectious Diseases, Sexually Transmitted Infections, HIV/AIDS, Generic health relevance
Description: Health policies and the problems they constitute are deeply shaped by multiple publics. In this article we conceptualize health policy counterpublics: temporally bounded socio-political forms that aim to cultivate particular modes of conduct, generally to resist trajectories set by arms of the state. These counterpublics often emerge from existing social movements and involve varied forms of activism and advocacy. We examine a health policy counterpublic that has arisen in response to new forms of HIV public health surveillance by drawing on public documents and interview data from 2021 with 26 stakeholders who were critical of key policy developments. Since 2018, the national rollout of molecular HIV surveillance (MHS) and cluster detection and response (CDR) programs in the United States has produced sustained controversies among HIV stakeholders, including among organized networks of people living with HIV. This article focuses on how a health policy counterpublic formed around MHS/CDR and how constituents problematized the policy agenda set in motion by federal health agencies, including in relation to data ethics, the meaningful involvement of affected communities, informed consent, the digitization of health systems, and HIV criminalization. Although familiar problems in HIV policymaking, concerns about these issues have been reconfigured in response to the new sociotechnical milieu proffered by MHS/CDR, generating new critical positions aiming to remake public health. Critical attention to the scenes within which health policy controversies play out ought to consider how (counter)publics are made, how problems are constituted, and the broader social movement dynamics and activist resources drawn upon to contest and reimagine policymaking in public life.
Document Type: Article
Other literature type
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISSN: 1460-3659
0306-3127
DOI: 10.1177/03063127231211933
Access URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38054426
Rights: CC BY
URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (http://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....d4b3a7c7ad00369a144b7a81ad0a9409
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
Abstract:Health policies and the problems they constitute are deeply shaped by multiple publics. In this article we conceptualize health policy counterpublics: temporally bounded socio-political forms that aim to cultivate particular modes of conduct, generally to resist trajectories set by arms of the state. These counterpublics often emerge from existing social movements and involve varied forms of activism and advocacy. We examine a health policy counterpublic that has arisen in response to new forms of HIV public health surveillance by drawing on public documents and interview data from 2021 with 26 stakeholders who were critical of key policy developments. Since 2018, the national rollout of molecular HIV surveillance (MHS) and cluster detection and response (CDR) programs in the United States has produced sustained controversies among HIV stakeholders, including among organized networks of people living with HIV. This article focuses on how a health policy counterpublic formed around MHS/CDR and how constituents problematized the policy agenda set in motion by federal health agencies, including in relation to data ethics, the meaningful involvement of affected communities, informed consent, the digitization of health systems, and HIV criminalization. Although familiar problems in HIV policymaking, concerns about these issues have been reconfigured in response to the new sociotechnical milieu proffered by MHS/CDR, generating new critical positions aiming to remake public health. Critical attention to the scenes within which health policy controversies play out ought to consider how (counter)publics are made, how problems are constituted, and the broader social movement dynamics and activist resources drawn upon to contest and reimagine policymaking in public life.
ISSN:14603659
03063127
DOI:10.1177/03063127231211933