Mechanical ventilation of patients in helicopter emergency medical service transport: an international survey

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Mechanical ventilation of patients in helicopter emergency medical service transport: an international survey
Authors: Peter Hilbert-Carius, Manuel F. Struck, Veronika Hofer, Jochen Hinkelbein, Leif Rognås, Jörn Adler, Michael D. Christian, Thomas Wurmb, Michael Bernhard, Björn Hossfeld
Source: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, Vol 28, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2020)
Hilbert-Carius, P, Struck, M F, Hofer, V, Hinkelbein, J, Rognås, L, Adler, J, Christian, M D, Wurmb, T, Bernhard, M & Hossfeld, B 2020, 'Mechanical ventilation of patients in helicopter emergency medical service transport : an international survey', Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, vol. 28, 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00801-1
Publisher Information: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.
Publication Year: 2020
Subject Terms: Adult, Male, Emergency Medical Services, Aircraft, Young Adult, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Germany, Surveys and Questionnaires, QUALITY, Humans, Registries, Original Research, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Aged, 80 and over, RC86-88.9, 9. Industry and infrastructure, MORTALITY, Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid, Air Ambulances, Middle Aged, Respiration, Artificial, Traumatic Surgery, United Kingdom, 3. Good health, Surveys and Questionnaires [MeSH], Female [MeSH], Aged, 80 and over [MeSH], Aged [MeSH], Adult [MeSH], Humans [MeSH], Retrospective Studies [MeSH], Middle Aged [MeSH], Emergency Medicine, Aircraft [MeSH], Male [MeSH], Switzerland [MeSH], Respiration, Artificial/methods [MeSH], Germany [MeSH], United Kingdom [MeSH], Young Adult [MeSH], Air Ambulances/organization, Austria [MeSH], Emergency Medical Services/methods [MeSH], Registries [MeSH], Austria, Female, Switzerland
Description: BackgroundMechanical ventilation in helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) environments is a procedure which carries a significant risk of complications. Limited data on the quality and performance of mechanical ventilation in HEMS are available in the literature.MethodWe conducted an international survey to evaluate mechanical ventilation infrastructure in HEMS and collect data of transported ventilated patients. From June 20–22, 2019, the participating HEMS bases were asked to provide data via a web-based platform. Vital parameters and ventilation settings of the patients at first patient contact and at handover were compared using non-parametric statistical tests.ResultsOut of 215 invited HEMS bases, 53 responded. Respondents were from Germany, Denmark, United Kingdom, Luxembourg, Austria and Switzerland. Of the HEMS bases, all teams were physician staffed, mainly anesthesiologists (79%), the majority were board certified (92.5%) and trained in intensive care medicine (89%) and had a median (range) experience in HEMS of 9 (0–25) years. HEMS may provide a high level of expertise in mechanical ventilation whereas the majority of ventilators are able to provide pressure controlled ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure modes (77%). Data of 30 ventilated patients with a median (range) age of 54 (21–100) years and 53% male gender were analyzed. Of these, 24 were primary missions and 6 interfacility transports. At handover, oxygen saturation (p p = 0.04) of the patients were significantly higher compared to first patient contact.ConclusionIn this survey, the management of ventilated HEMS-patients was not associated with ventilation related serious adverse events. Patient conditions, training of medical crew and different technical and environmental resources are likely to influence management. Further studies are necessary to assess safety and process quality of mechanical ventilation in HEMS.Trial registrationThe survey was prospectively registered at Research Registry (researchregistry2925).
Document Type: Article
Conference object
Other literature type
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISSN: 1757-7241
DOI: 10.1186/s13049-020-00801-1
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-32781/v2
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-32781/v3
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-32781/v1
DOI: 10.18725/oparu-51601
Access URL: https://sjtrem.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13049-020-00801-1
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33208195
https://doaj.org/article/6f5a4db0cd5b4c3e82859acdd75b0735
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208195
https://sjtrem.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13049-020-00801-1
https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC7672415
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-32781/v1
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-32781/v2.pdf?c=1597347830000
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672415
https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6472070
https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/2f5b9f51-41c6-4609-81c5-c19d15078343
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096201237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00801-1
Rights: CC BY
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....d06c0d4cf7f2bd35b06a674affb1dcc6
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
Abstract:BackgroundMechanical ventilation in helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) environments is a procedure which carries a significant risk of complications. Limited data on the quality and performance of mechanical ventilation in HEMS are available in the literature.MethodWe conducted an international survey to evaluate mechanical ventilation infrastructure in HEMS and collect data of transported ventilated patients. From June 20–22, 2019, the participating HEMS bases were asked to provide data via a web-based platform. Vital parameters and ventilation settings of the patients at first patient contact and at handover were compared using non-parametric statistical tests.ResultsOut of 215 invited HEMS bases, 53 responded. Respondents were from Germany, Denmark, United Kingdom, Luxembourg, Austria and Switzerland. Of the HEMS bases, all teams were physician staffed, mainly anesthesiologists (79%), the majority were board certified (92.5%) and trained in intensive care medicine (89%) and had a median (range) experience in HEMS of 9 (0–25) years. HEMS may provide a high level of expertise in mechanical ventilation whereas the majority of ventilators are able to provide pressure controlled ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure modes (77%). Data of 30 ventilated patients with a median (range) age of 54 (21–100) years and 53% male gender were analyzed. Of these, 24 were primary missions and 6 interfacility transports. At handover, oxygen saturation (p p = 0.04) of the patients were significantly higher compared to first patient contact.ConclusionIn this survey, the management of ventilated HEMS-patients was not associated with ventilation related serious adverse events. Patient conditions, training of medical crew and different technical and environmental resources are likely to influence management. Further studies are necessary to assess safety and process quality of mechanical ventilation in HEMS.Trial registrationThe survey was prospectively registered at Research Registry (researchregistry2925).
ISSN:17577241
DOI:10.1186/s13049-020-00801-1