Improving technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate bone scan images using histogram specification technique

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Improving technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate bone scan images using histogram specification technique
Authors: Ashish Negi, Chandrasekhar Bal, Param Dev Sharma, Rajesh Kumar, Anil Kumar Pandey, Girish Kumar Parida, Harish Goyal, Akshima Sharma
Source: World J Nucl Med
World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol 19, Iss 03, Pp 224-232 (2020)
Publisher Information: Georg Thieme Verlag KG, 2020.
Publication Year: 2020
Subject Terms: Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine, 03 medical and health sciences, histogram specification, 0302 clinical medicine, technetium 99m methyl diphosphonate bone scan, R895-920, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Original Article, image enhancement, 02 engineering and technology, 3. Good health
Description: In this study, we have proposed and validated that histogram of a good-quality bone scan image can enhance a poor-quality bone scan image. The histograms of two good-quality technetium-99m methyl diphosphonate bone scan images IAand IBrecommended by nuclear medicine physicians (NMPs) were used to enhance 87 poor-quality bone scan images. Processed images and their corresponding input images were compared visually by two NMPs with scoring and also quantitatively using entropy, Structural similarity index measure, edge-based contrast measure, and absolute brightness mean error. Barnard's unconditional test was applied with a null hypothesis that the histogram of both IAand IBproduces similar output image at α =0.05. The mean values of quantitative metrices of the processed images obtained using IAand IBwere compared using Kolmogorov—Smirnov test. Histogram of a good-quality bone scan image can enhance a poor-quality bone scan image. Visually, histogram of IBimproved statistically significantly higher proportion (P < 0.0001) of images (86/87) as compared to histogram of IA(51/87). Quantitatively, IBperformed better than IA,and the Chi-square distance of input and IBwas smaller than that of IA. In addition, a statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference in all the quantitative metrics among the outputs obtained using IAand IBwas observed. In our study, reference histogram of good-quality bone scan images transformed the majority of poor-quality bone scan images (98.85%) into visually good-quality images acceptable by NMPs.
Document Type: Article
Other literature type
Language: English
ISSN: 1607-3312
1450-1147
DOI: 10.4103/wjnm.wjnm_66_19
Access URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33354177
https://doaj.org/article/5ead85df98cf41ad949f442a4781af9f
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745874
https://www.wjnm.org/article.asp?issn=1450-1147;year=2020;volume=19;issue=3;spage=224;epage=232;aulast=Pandey;type=0
http://www.wjnm.org/article.asp?issn=1450-1147;year=2020;volume=19;issue=3;spage=224;epage=232;aulast=Pandey;type=3
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33354177/
Rights: CC BY NC ND
CC BY NC SA
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....cda660772227c29052f22d5a42182ff2
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
Abstract:In this study, we have proposed and validated that histogram of a good-quality bone scan image can enhance a poor-quality bone scan image. The histograms of two good-quality technetium-99m methyl diphosphonate bone scan images IAand IBrecommended by nuclear medicine physicians (NMPs) were used to enhance 87 poor-quality bone scan images. Processed images and their corresponding input images were compared visually by two NMPs with scoring and also quantitatively using entropy, Structural similarity index measure, edge-based contrast measure, and absolute brightness mean error. Barnard's unconditional test was applied with a null hypothesis that the histogram of both IAand IBproduces similar output image at α =0.05. The mean values of quantitative metrices of the processed images obtained using IAand IBwere compared using Kolmogorov—Smirnov test. Histogram of a good-quality bone scan image can enhance a poor-quality bone scan image. Visually, histogram of IBimproved statistically significantly higher proportion (P < 0.0001) of images (86/87) as compared to histogram of IA(51/87). Quantitatively, IBperformed better than IA,and the Chi-square distance of input and IBwas smaller than that of IA. In addition, a statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference in all the quantitative metrics among the outputs obtained using IAand IBwas observed. In our study, reference histogram of good-quality bone scan images transformed the majority of poor-quality bone scan images (98.85%) into visually good-quality images acceptable by NMPs.
ISSN:16073312
14501147
DOI:10.4103/wjnm.wjnm_66_19