VariplexTM test system fails to reliably detect SARS-CoV-2 directly from respiratory samples without RNA extraction

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: VariplexTM test system fails to reliably detect SARS-CoV-2 directly from respiratory samples without RNA extraction
Authors: Eckel, Florian, Küsters, Franziska, Drossel, Bernhard, Konert, Markus, Mattes, Hans, Schopf, Stefan
Source: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Publisher Information: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.
Publication Year: 2020
Subject Terms: Microbiology (medical), Male, 0301 basic medicine, Pneumonia, Viral, Oropharynx, COVID-19, Aged, 80 and over [MeSH], Aged [MeSH], COVID-19 Testing [MeSH], Coronavirus Infections/blood [MeSH], Coronavirus Infections/mortality [MeSH], RNA, Viral/blood [MeSH], COVID-19 diagnostic testing, Germany/epidemiology [MeSH], Pneumonia, Viral/blood [MeSH], Original Article, Sensitivity and Specificity [MeSH], Male [MeSH], COVID-19 [MeSH], Nasopharynx/virology [MeSH], False Negative Reactions [MeSH], SARS-CoV-2 [MeSH], Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods [MeSH], SARS-CoV-2, Specificity and sensitivity, Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity [MeSH], Female [MeSH], Oropharynx/virology [MeSH], Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis [MeSH], Betacoronavirus/genetics [MeSH], Humans [MeSH], False-negative reactions, Severity of Illness Index [MeSH], Survival Analysis [MeSH], RNA, Viral/genetics [MeSH], Retrospective Studies [MeSH], Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology [MeSH], Pandemics [MeSH], Pneumonia, Viral/mortality [MeSH], Loop-mediated isothermal amplification, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards [MeSH], Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis [MeSH], Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards [MeSH], Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods [MeSH], Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods [MeSH], Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology [MeSH], Infectious disease outbreaks, Betacoronavirus, 03 medical and health sciences, COVID-19 Testing, Germany, Nasopharynx, Humans, False Negative Reactions, Pandemics, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, 0303 health sciences, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, General Medicine, ddc, 3. Good health, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, RNA, Viral, Female, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Coronavirus Infections, Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
Description: Diagnosis of COVID is performed by PCR methods, but their capacitiy is limited by the requirement of high-level facilities and instruments. The loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method has been utilized for the detection of isolated virus-specific RNA. Preliminary data suggest the possibility of isothermal amplification directly from respiratory samples without RNA extraction.All patients admitted to our hospital were screened for SARS-CoV-2 by routine. Respiratory samples were tested by variplex system based on LAMP method directly without RNA extraction and by PCR. Confirmation or exclusion of clinical COVID diagnosis was based on history, examination and findings. Primary endpoint was the false negative rate of variplex test compared to PCR.A total of 153 patients were included in the study. Median age was 79 years and male/female ratio was 45%/55%. Prevalence of clinical COVID diagnosis was 61.4%. Variplex test and PCR assay was positive in 15.0% and 45.5%, respectively. In 109 patients variplex test and PCR assay were performed simultaneously. False negative rate of variplex test compared to PCR was 83.0%.The potential of LAMP-technology using isolated RNA has been demonstrated impressively by others and excellent sensitivity and specivity of detecting SARS-CoV-2 has been reported. However, without RNA extraction the variplex test system failed to reliable detect SARS-CoV-2 directly in respiratory samples.
Document Type: Article
Other literature type
File Description: application/pdf
ISSN: 1435-4373
0934-9723
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-33871/v1
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-020-03983-9
Access URL: https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1575875/document.pdf
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10096-020-03983-9.pdf
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32681309
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-33871/v1
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32681309
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-33871/v1.pdf?c=1631857297000
https://www.scilit.net/article/d6f2766d29e309a08e1783fa63c789c6
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03983-9
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-020-03983-9
https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6468144
https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/1575875
Rights: CC BY
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....ca38e4e2640ca858fb9c0460c523fdd5
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
Abstract:Diagnosis of COVID is performed by PCR methods, but their capacitiy is limited by the requirement of high-level facilities and instruments. The loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method has been utilized for the detection of isolated virus-specific RNA. Preliminary data suggest the possibility of isothermal amplification directly from respiratory samples without RNA extraction.All patients admitted to our hospital were screened for SARS-CoV-2 by routine. Respiratory samples were tested by variplex system based on LAMP method directly without RNA extraction and by PCR. Confirmation or exclusion of clinical COVID diagnosis was based on history, examination and findings. Primary endpoint was the false negative rate of variplex test compared to PCR.A total of 153 patients were included in the study. Median age was 79 years and male/female ratio was 45%/55%. Prevalence of clinical COVID diagnosis was 61.4%. Variplex test and PCR assay was positive in 15.0% and 45.5%, respectively. In 109 patients variplex test and PCR assay were performed simultaneously. False negative rate of variplex test compared to PCR was 83.0%.The potential of LAMP-technology using isolated RNA has been demonstrated impressively by others and excellent sensitivity and specivity of detecting SARS-CoV-2 has been reported. However, without RNA extraction the variplex test system failed to reliable detect SARS-CoV-2 directly in respiratory samples.
ISSN:14354373
09349723
DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-33871/v1