From the Notebooks to the Investigations and Beyond
Gespeichert in:
| Titel: | From the Notebooks to the Investigations and Beyond |
|---|---|
| Autoren: | Ruy J.G.B. de Queiroz |
| Quelle: | SATS. 26:61-113 |
| Publication Status: | Preprint |
| Verlagsinformationen: | Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2025. |
| Publikationsjahr: | 2025 |
| Schlagwörter: | FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Mathematics - History and Overview, History and Overview (math.HO), 03, 00, 03F03, 03Fxx, 03B38, FOS: Mathematics, F.4.1, F.3.2, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO) |
| Beschreibung: | The use of the open and searchable Wittgenstein’s Nachlass (The Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen (WAB)) has proved instrumental in the quest for a common thread of Wittgenstein’s view on the connections between meaning, use and consequences, going from the Notebooks to later writings (including the Philosophical Investigations) and beyond. Here we take this as the basis for a proposal for a formal counterpart of a ‘meaning-as-use’ (dialogical/game-theoretical) semantics for the language of predicate logic. In order to further consolidate this perspective, we shall need to bring in key excerpts from Wittgenstein oeuvre (including the Nachlass) and from those formal semanticists who advocate a different perspective on the connections between proofs and meaning. With this in mind we consider several passages from Wittgenstein’s published as well as unpublished writings to build a whole picture of a formal counterpart to ‘meaning is use’ based on the idea that explanations of consequences via ‘movements within language’ ought to be taken as a central aspect to Wittgenstein’s shift from ‘interpretation of symbols in a state of affairs’ to ‘use of symbols’ which underpins his ‘meaning is use’ paradigm. As in the Investigations “every interpretation hangs in the air together with what it interprets, and cannot give it any support. Interpretations by themselves do not determine meaning”, as well as in a remark from his transitional period (1929–30): Perhaps one should say that the expression “interpretation of symbols” is misleading and one should instead say “the use of symbols”. Significantly, we wish the present examination of the searchable Nachlass can make a relevant step towards a formal counterpart to the “meaning is use” dictum, while highlighting an important common thread from Wittgenstein’s very early to very late writings. For this we focus here on the themes of explanation of consequences, movements within language, moving away from states of affairs, meaning versus verification. |
| Publikationsart: | Article |
| Sprache: | English |
| ISSN: | 1869-7577 1600-1974 |
| DOI: | 10.1515/sats-2024-0015 |
| DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2504.18949 |
| Zugangs-URL: | http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.18949 |
| Rights: | CC BY |
| Dokumentencode: | edsair.doi.dedup.....c14a47d60187466113f453539bd716f4 |
| Datenbank: | OpenAIRE |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | The use of the open and searchable Wittgenstein’s Nachlass (The Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen (WAB)) has proved instrumental in the quest for a common thread of Wittgenstein’s view on the connections between meaning, use and consequences, going from the Notebooks to later writings (including the Philosophical Investigations) and beyond. Here we take this as the basis for a proposal for a formal counterpart of a ‘meaning-as-use’ (dialogical/game-theoretical) semantics for the language of predicate logic. In order to further consolidate this perspective, we shall need to bring in key excerpts from Wittgenstein oeuvre (including the Nachlass) and from those formal semanticists who advocate a different perspective on the connections between proofs and meaning. With this in mind we consider several passages from Wittgenstein’s published as well as unpublished writings to build a whole picture of a formal counterpart to ‘meaning is use’ based on the idea that explanations of consequences via ‘movements within language’ ought to be taken as a central aspect to Wittgenstein’s shift from ‘interpretation of symbols in a state of affairs’ to ‘use of symbols’ which underpins his ‘meaning is use’ paradigm. As in the Investigations “every interpretation hangs in the air together with what it interprets, and cannot give it any support. Interpretations by themselves do not determine meaning”, as well as in a remark from his transitional period (1929–30): Perhaps one should say that the expression “interpretation of symbols” is misleading and one should instead say “the use of symbols”. Significantly, we wish the present examination of the searchable Nachlass can make a relevant step towards a formal counterpart to the “meaning is use” dictum, while highlighting an important common thread from Wittgenstein’s very early to very late writings. For this we focus here on the themes of explanation of consequences, movements within language, moving away from states of affairs, meaning versus verification. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 18697577 16001974 |
| DOI: | 10.1515/sats-2024-0015 |