The Promise and Pitfalls of Conflict Prediction: Evidence from Colombia and Indonesia

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Promise and Pitfalls of Conflict Prediction: Evidence from Colombia and Indonesia
Authors: Dube, Oeindrila, Blair, Robert, Gudgeon, Matthew, Peck, Richard, Blattman, Christopher, Bazzi, Samuel
Source: The Review of Economics and Statistics. 104:764-779
Publication Status: Preprint
Publisher Information: MIT Press, 2019.
Publication Year: 2019
Subject Terms: bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science|Comparative Politics, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Economics, 05 social sciences, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Economics, 1. No poverty, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science, 16. Peace & justice, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Economics|Growth and Development, 0506 political science, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science|Comparative Politics, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Economics|Growth and Development
Description: How feasible is violence early-warning prediction? Colombia and Indonesia have unusually fine-grained data. We assemble two decades of local violent events alongside hundreds of annual risk factors. We attempt to predict violence one year ahead with a range of machine learning techniques. Our models reliably identify persistent, high-violence hot spots. Violence is not simply autoregressive, as detailed histories of disaggregated violence perform best, but socioeconomic data substitute well for these histories. Even with unusually rich data, however, our models poorly predict new outbreaks or escalations of violence. These “best-case” scenarios with annual data fall short of workable early-warning systems.
Document Type: Article
Language: English
ISSN: 1530-9142
0034-6535
DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_01016
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/bkrn8
Access URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w25980.pdf
https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w25980/w25980.pdf
https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/25980.html
http://www.nber.org/papers/w25980
https://www.nber.org/papers/w25980
https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/rest_a_01016
https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/bkrn8
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....b37c513d594155ca93289c67a3cc3a58
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
Abstract:How feasible is violence early-warning prediction? Colombia and Indonesia have unusually fine-grained data. We assemble two decades of local violent events alongside hundreds of annual risk factors. We attempt to predict violence one year ahead with a range of machine learning techniques. Our models reliably identify persistent, high-violence hot spots. Violence is not simply autoregressive, as detailed histories of disaggregated violence perform best, but socioeconomic data substitute well for these histories. Even with unusually rich data, however, our models poorly predict new outbreaks or escalations of violence. These “best-case” scenarios with annual data fall short of workable early-warning systems.
ISSN:15309142
00346535
DOI:10.1162/rest_a_01016