Ecosystems in DMA designation decisions - Bridging the gap between legal text and economic reality
Uloženo v:
| Název: | Ecosystems in DMA designation decisions - Bridging the gap between legal text and economic reality |
|---|---|
| Autoři: | Boom , Jasper van den, Hornung , Philipp |
| Zdroj: | Journal of European Competition Law & Practice. 16:3-19 |
| Informace o vydavateli: | Oxford University Press (OUP), 2025. |
| Rok vydání: | 2025 |
| Témata: | Competition Law, EU Law, FOS: Law, 340 Recht, ddc:340, Law |
| Popis: | A divide between legal text and economic reality characterizes the Digital Markets Act (DMA): whilst in the competition policy discourse ecosystems take a central role, they are absent in the legal text of the DMA. This leads to frictions and legal uncertainty in the DMA’s application as can been seen in the disparate use of ecosystem-related arguments in the Commission’s designation decisions. In this situation, the General Court brought some clarity in its ByteDance judgement by providing an ecosystem definition and clarifying some points with regard to which and how ecosystem-related arguments can be used in designation proceedings and what the respective standard of proof is. Nonetheless, many issue remain unresolved, letting us to conclude with a tentative outlook on things to come. |
| Druh dokumentu: | Article |
| Popis souboru: | application/pdf |
| Jazyk: | English |
| ISSN: | 2041-7772 2041-7764 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/jeclap/lpaf012 |
| DOI: | 10.18452/33804 |
| Přístupová URL adresa: | http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/34436 https://doi.org/10.18452/33804 |
| Rights: | CC BY |
| Přístupové číslo: | edsair.doi.dedup.....b113cb89736036d20ec79f8cb0e9ca37 |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Abstrakt: | A divide between legal text and economic reality characterizes the Digital Markets Act (DMA): whilst in the competition policy discourse ecosystems take a central role, they are absent in the legal text of the DMA. This leads to frictions and legal uncertainty in the DMA’s application as can been seen in the disparate use of ecosystem-related arguments in the Commission’s designation decisions. In this situation, the General Court brought some clarity in its ByteDance judgement by providing an ecosystem definition and clarifying some points with regard to which and how ecosystem-related arguments can be used in designation proceedings and what the respective standard of proof is. Nonetheless, many issue remain unresolved, letting us to conclude with a tentative outlook on things to come. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 20417772 20417764 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/jeclap/lpaf012 |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science