Ecosystems in DMA designation decisions - Bridging the gap between legal text and economic reality

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Ecosystems in DMA designation decisions - Bridging the gap between legal text and economic reality
Autoři: Boom , Jasper van den, Hornung , Philipp
Zdroj: Journal of European Competition Law & Practice. 16:3-19
Informace o vydavateli: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2025.
Rok vydání: 2025
Témata: Competition Law, EU Law, FOS: Law, 340 Recht, ddc:340, Law
Popis: A divide between legal text and economic reality characterizes the Digital Markets Act (DMA): whilst in the competition policy discourse ecosystems take a central role, they are absent in the legal text of the DMA. This leads to frictions and legal uncertainty in the DMA’s application as can been seen in the disparate use of ecosystem-related arguments in the Commission’s designation decisions. In this situation, the General Court brought some clarity in its ByteDance judgement by providing an ecosystem definition and clarifying some points with regard to which and how ecosystem-related arguments can be used in designation proceedings and what the respective standard of proof is. Nonetheless, many issue remain unresolved, letting us to conclude with a tentative outlook on things to come.
Druh dokumentu: Article
Popis souboru: application/pdf
Jazyk: English
ISSN: 2041-7772
2041-7764
DOI: 10.1093/jeclap/lpaf012
DOI: 10.18452/33804
Přístupová URL adresa: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/34436
https://doi.org/10.18452/33804
Rights: CC BY
Přístupové číslo: edsair.doi.dedup.....b113cb89736036d20ec79f8cb0e9ca37
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Popis
Abstrakt:A divide between legal text and economic reality characterizes the Digital Markets Act (DMA): whilst in the competition policy discourse ecosystems take a central role, they are absent in the legal text of the DMA. This leads to frictions and legal uncertainty in the DMA’s application as can been seen in the disparate use of ecosystem-related arguments in the Commission’s designation decisions. In this situation, the General Court brought some clarity in its ByteDance judgement by providing an ecosystem definition and clarifying some points with regard to which and how ecosystem-related arguments can be used in designation proceedings and what the respective standard of proof is. Nonetheless, many issue remain unresolved, letting us to conclude with a tentative outlook on things to come.
ISSN:20417772
20417764
DOI:10.1093/jeclap/lpaf012