Informe complementario: Análisis estadístico comparativo multifuente para Reingeniería de Procesos. Informe 01-IC (116/138)
Uložené v:
| Názov: | Informe complementario: Análisis estadístico comparativo multifuente para Reingeniería de Procesos. Informe 01-IC (116/138) |
|---|---|
| Autori: | Anez, Diomar, Anez, Dimar |
| Informácie o vydavateľovi: | Solidum Producciones, 2025. |
| Rok vydania: | 2025 |
| Predmety: | Management Tools, Google Books Ngram, Adoption Curve, Multi-source Analysis, Ecosystemic Perspective, Correlation Analysis, User Satisfaction, Niche Practice, Crossref, Google Trends, Process Reengineering, Management Fads, Managerial Science, Business Process Reengineering (BPR), Statistical Analysis, Longitudinal Data Analysis, Data Triangulation, Life Cycle Analysis, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Bain & Company |
| Popis: | This technical report presents a multi-source comparative statistical analysis of the management tool, Process Reengineering, to understand its evolutionary trajectory. The study synthesizes longitudinal data from five distinct sources: Google Trends (public interest), Google Books Ngram (literary discourse), Crossref.org (academic publications), and Bain & Company surveys (executive usability and satisfaction). The analysis reveals a dual life cycle for Process Reengineering. Initially, it followed the classic pattern of a management fad, characterized by an explosive adoption boom in the mid-1990s, strongly correlated with public interest, followed by a drastic decline. This phase was marked by a significant negative correlation between high adoption rates and low user satisfaction. However, the analysis also uncovers a second, more persistent life cycle. Academic and literary discourse continued long after practical adoption collapsed, and user satisfaction paradoxically rose to its peak decades later, suggesting a "survival effect." The tool evolved from a universally promoted trend into a high-value, specialized practice for a niche of expert users. The study concludes that a multi-faceted, ecosystemic approach is essential to holistically understand the complex dynamics of management tools, as reliance on a single data source can be misleading. Title (English): Complementary Report: Multi-source Comparative Statistical Analysis for Process Reengineering. Report 01-IC (116/138) © 2025, Diomar G. Añez B., y Dimar J. Añez B. Repository: https://github.com/Wise-Connex/Management-Tools-Analysis.git Programming Language: Python Development Status: Active |
| Druh dokumentu: | Book |
| Jazyk: | Spanish; Castilian |
| DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.15339315 |
| DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.16908166 |
| Rights: | CC BY NC |
| Prístupové číslo: | edsair.doi.dedup.....b0bb603b2465e075c662bca276d2c84e |
| Databáza: | OpenAIRE |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstrakt: | This technical report presents a multi-source comparative statistical analysis of the management tool, Process Reengineering, to understand its evolutionary trajectory. The study synthesizes longitudinal data from five distinct sources: Google Trends (public interest), Google Books Ngram (literary discourse), Crossref.org (academic publications), and Bain & Company surveys (executive usability and satisfaction). The analysis reveals a dual life cycle for Process Reengineering. Initially, it followed the classic pattern of a management fad, characterized by an explosive adoption boom in the mid-1990s, strongly correlated with public interest, followed by a drastic decline. This phase was marked by a significant negative correlation between high adoption rates and low user satisfaction. However, the analysis also uncovers a second, more persistent life cycle. Academic and literary discourse continued long after practical adoption collapsed, and user satisfaction paradoxically rose to its peak decades later, suggesting a "survival effect." The tool evolved from a universally promoted trend into a high-value, specialized practice for a niche of expert users. The study concludes that a multi-faceted, ecosystemic approach is essential to holistically understand the complex dynamics of management tools, as reliance on a single data source can be misleading.<br />Title (English): Complementary Report: Multi-source Comparative Statistical Analysis for Process Reengineering. Report 01-IC (116/138) © 2025, Diomar G. Añez B., y Dimar J. Añez B. Repository: https://github.com/Wise-Connex/Management-Tools-Analysis.git Programming Language: Python Development Status: Active |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.15339315 |