European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (2) intraoperative imaging: (2) intraoperative imaging
Uloženo v:
| Název: | European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (2) intraoperative imaging: (2) intraoperative imaging |
|---|---|
| Autoři: | Jochen Herrmann, Philippe Petit, Stéphanie Franchi-Abella, Martijn V. Verhagen, Simon P. McGuirk, Elena Dammann, Reinoud P. H. Bokkers, Philippe R. M. Clapuyt, Annamaria Deganello, Francesco Tandoi, Jean de Ville de Goyet, Hanna Hebelka, Charlotte de Lange, Cecile Lozach, Paolo Marra, Darius Mirza, Piotr Kaliciński, Janina M. Patsch, Giulia Perucca, Ilias Tsiflikas, Diane M. Renz, Bernd Schweiger, Marco Spada, Seema Toso, Loïc Viremouneix, Helen Woodley, Lutz Fischer, Lil-Sofie Ording-Müller, Florian Brinkert |
| Přispěvatelé: | UCL - SSS/IREC/IMAG - Pôle d'imagerie médicale, UCL - (SLuc) Service de radiologie, Herrmann, J., Petit, P., Franchi-Abella, S., Verhagen, M. V., Mcguirk, S. P., Dammann, E., Bokkers, R. P. H., Clapuyt, P. R. M., Deganello, A., Tandoi, F., de Ville de Goyet, J., Hebelka, H., de Lange, C., Lozach, C., Marra, P., Mirza, D., Kalicinski, P., Patsch, J. M., Perucca, G., Tsiflikas, I., Renz, D. M., Schweiger, B., Spada, M., Toso, S., Viremouneix, L., Woodley, H., Fischer, L., Ording-Muller, L. -S., Brinkert, F. |
| Zdroj: | Pediatr Radiol Pediatric radiology, Vol. 54, no.2, p. 269-275 (2024) |
| Informace o vydavateli: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2024. |
| Rok vydání: | 2024 |
| Témata: | Liver transplantation, Medizin, Liver Transplantation, 3. Good health, Radiography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Postoperative Complications, Child, Computed tomography, Radiography [MeSH], Ultrasonography [MeSH], Humans [MeSH], Liver Transplantation [MeSH], Radiology [MeSH], Original Article, Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging [MeSH], Ultrasonography, Child [MeSH], Humans, Radiology |
| Popis: | BackgroundLiver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element in the detection of intraoperative and postoperative complications. So far, only limited data regarding the best radiological approach to monitor children during liver transplantation is available.ObjectiveTo harmonize the imaging of pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra- and postoperative phase. This paper reports the responses related to intraoperative imaging.Materials and methodsAn online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted, and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey.ResultsIntraoperative ultrasound (US) is used by all sites to assess the quality of the vascular anastomosis in order to ensure optimal perfusion of the liver transplant. Vessel depiction is commonly achieved using color Doppler (95.3%). Additional US-based techniques are employed by fewer centers (power angio mode, 28.6%; B-flow, 19%; contrast-enhanced US, 14.3%). Most centers prefer a collaborative approach, with surgeons responsible for probe handling, while radiologists operate the US machine (47.6%). Less commonly, the intraoperative US is performed by the surgeon alone (28.6%) or by the radiologist alone (23.8%). Timing of US, imaging frequency, and documentation practices vary among centers.ConclusionIntraoperative US is consistently utilized across all sites during pediatric liver transplantation. However, considerable variations were observed in terms of the US setup, technique preferences, timing of controls, and documentation practices. These differences provide valuable insights for future optimization and harmonization studies. |
| Druh dokumentu: | Article Other literature type |
| Jazyk: | English |
| ISSN: | 1432-1998 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00247-023-05840-1 |
| DOI: | 10.15496/publikation-97160 |
| Přístupová URL adresa: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38216682 https://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/304146 https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6521305 |
| Rights: | CC BY |
| Přístupové číslo: | edsair.doi.dedup.....a8543472d8b726b5211f64e0ab0d82c5 |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstrakt: | BackgroundLiver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element in the detection of intraoperative and postoperative complications. So far, only limited data regarding the best radiological approach to monitor children during liver transplantation is available.ObjectiveTo harmonize the imaging of pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra- and postoperative phase. This paper reports the responses related to intraoperative imaging.Materials and methodsAn online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted, and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey.ResultsIntraoperative ultrasound (US) is used by all sites to assess the quality of the vascular anastomosis in order to ensure optimal perfusion of the liver transplant. Vessel depiction is commonly achieved using color Doppler (95.3%). Additional US-based techniques are employed by fewer centers (power angio mode, 28.6%; B-flow, 19%; contrast-enhanced US, 14.3%). Most centers prefer a collaborative approach, with surgeons responsible for probe handling, while radiologists operate the US machine (47.6%). Less commonly, the intraoperative US is performed by the surgeon alone (28.6%) or by the radiologist alone (23.8%). Timing of US, imaging frequency, and documentation practices vary among centers.ConclusionIntraoperative US is consistently utilized across all sites during pediatric liver transplantation. However, considerable variations were observed in terms of the US setup, technique preferences, timing of controls, and documentation practices. These differences provide valuable insights for future optimization and harmonization studies. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 14321998 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00247-023-05840-1 |