Assessing the use of the frequency, etiology, direction, and severity classification system for shoulder instability in physical therapy research – A scoping review
Gespeichert in:
| Titel: | Assessing the use of the frequency, etiology, direction, and severity classification system for shoulder instability in physical therapy research – A scoping review |
|---|---|
| Autoren: | Rubén Fernández-Matías, Enrique Lluch-Girbés, Marcus Bateman, Néstor Requejo-Salinas |
| Weitere Verfasser: | Pain in Motion, Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy |
| Quelle: | Fernández-Matías Lluch Girbés, Enrique Bateman, Marcus Requejo-Salinas, Néstor 2024 Assessing the use of the frequency, etiology, direction, and severity classification system for shoulder instability in physical therapy research-A scoping review Physical Therapy In Sport 66 76 84 RODERIC. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat de València instname |
| Verlagsinformationen: | Elsevier BV, 2024. |
| Publikationsjahr: | 2024 |
| Schlagwörter: | Joint Instability, Joint Instability/classification, Shoulder Joint, Shoulder Dislocation, Shoulder Dislocation/classification, Humans, Shoulder Injuries, Physical Therapy Modalities, Shoulder Joint/physiopathology, fisioteràpia |
| Beschreibung: | The aim of this study is to review the implementation of the Frequency, Etiology, Direction, and Severity (FEDS) classification for shoulder instability by the physical therapy scientific community since its publication in 2011.A systematic search was conducted on January 10, 2024 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and SciELO databases, as well as Google Scholar. Studies investigating physical therapy interventions in people with shoulder instability, and reporting selection criteria for shoulder instability were considered eligible. A narrative synthesis was conducted.Twenty-six studies were included. None reported using the FEDS classification as eligibility criteria for shoulder instability. Only 42% of the studies provided data of all four criteria of the FEDS classification. The most reported criterion was direction (92%), followed by etiology (85%), severity (65%), and frequency (58%). The most common reported descriptor for profiling shoulder instability was "dislocation" (83.3%), followed by "first-time" (66.7%), "anterior" (62.5%), and "traumatic" (59.1%). Regarding other instability classifications, only one study (4%) used the Thomas & Matsen classification, and two (8%) the Stanmore classification.The FEDS classification system has not been embraced enough by the physical therapy scientific community since its publication in 2011. |
| Publikationsart: | Article |
| Dateibeschreibung: | application/pdf |
| Sprache: | English |
| ISSN: | 1466-853X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.01.010 |
| Zugangs-URL: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38359729 https://hdl.handle.net/10550/109399 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14017/0a283f0b-3365-4c22-9397-9764825f98c7 https://biblio.vub.ac.be/vubir/assessing-the-use-of-the-frequency-etiology-direction-and-severity-classification-system-for-shoulder-instability-in-physical-therapy-research--a-scoping-review(0a283f0b-3365-4c22-9397-9764825f98c7).html https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.01.010 |
| Rights: | CC BY NC |
| Dokumentencode: | edsair.doi.dedup.....9ef2fea7c0943ccca248346d1f53246d |
| Datenbank: | OpenAIRE |
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | The aim of this study is to review the implementation of the Frequency, Etiology, Direction, and Severity (FEDS) classification for shoulder instability by the physical therapy scientific community since its publication in 2011.A systematic search was conducted on January 10, 2024 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and SciELO databases, as well as Google Scholar. Studies investigating physical therapy interventions in people with shoulder instability, and reporting selection criteria for shoulder instability were considered eligible. A narrative synthesis was conducted.Twenty-six studies were included. None reported using the FEDS classification as eligibility criteria for shoulder instability. Only 42% of the studies provided data of all four criteria of the FEDS classification. The most reported criterion was direction (92%), followed by etiology (85%), severity (65%), and frequency (58%). The most common reported descriptor for profiling shoulder instability was "dislocation" (83.3%), followed by "first-time" (66.7%), "anterior" (62.5%), and "traumatic" (59.1%). Regarding other instability classifications, only one study (4%) used the Thomas & Matsen classification, and two (8%) the Stanmore classification.The FEDS classification system has not been embraced enough by the physical therapy scientific community since its publication in 2011. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1466853X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.01.010 |