Impact of surgeon experience on routine prolapse operations

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Impact of surgeon experience on routine prolapse operations
Authors: Emil Nüssler, Jacob Kjær Eskildsen, Emil Karl Nüssler, Marie Bixo, Mats Löfgren
Source: Int Urogynecol J
Nüssler, E, Eskildsen, J K, Nüssler, E K, Bixo, M & Löfgren, M 2018, 'Impact of surgeon experience on routine prolapse operations', International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 297-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3353-0
Publisher Information: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2017.
Publication Year: 2017
Subject Terms: Adult, Male, Reoperation, surgical outcome, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/standards, national register data, patient-reported outcome, Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, 03 medical and health sciences, Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, 0302 clinical medicine, Humans, quality control, Surgeons/standards, Learning curve, Patient-reported outcome, Aged, Surgeons, Sweden, Surgical outcome, Kirurgi, Quality control, Reoperation/standards, Middle Aged, pelvic organ prolapse, Pelvic organ prolapse, 3. Good health, learning curve, Treatment Outcome, National register data, Patient Satisfaction, 13. Climate action, Surgery, Original Article, Female, Clinical Competence
Description: Surgical work encompasses important aspects of personal and manual skills. In major surgery, there is a positive correlation between surgical experience and results. For pelvic organ prolapse (POP), this relationship has to our knowledge never been examined. In any clinical practice, there is always a certain proportion of inexperienced surgeons. In Sweden, most prolapse surgeons have little experience in performing prolapse operations, 74% conducting the procedure once a month or less. Simultaneously, surgery for POP globally has failure rates of 25-30%. In other words, for most surgeons, the operation is a low-frequency procedure, and outcomes are unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to clarify the acceptability of having a high proportion of low-volume surgeons in the management of POP.A group of 14,676 exclusively primary anterior or posterior repair patients was assessed. Data were analyzed by logistic regression and as a group analysis.Experienced surgeons had shorter operation times and hospital stays. Surgical experience did not affect surgical or patient-reported complication rates, organ damage, reoperation, rehospitalization, or patient satisfaction, nor did it improve patient-reported failure rates 1 year after surgery. Assistant experience, similarly, had no effect on the outcome of the operation.A management model for isolated anterior or posterior POP surgery that includes a high proportion of low-volume surgeons does not have a negative impact on the quality or outcome of anterior or posterior colporrhaphy. Consequently, the high recurrence rate was not due to insufficient experience of the surgeons performing the operation.
Document Type: Article
Other literature type
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
ISSN: 1433-3023
0937-3462
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3353-0
Access URL: https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc5780527?pdf=render
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28577172
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00192-017-3353-0.pdf
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-017-3353-0
http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1187473
http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1187473
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-017-3353-0/fulltext.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28577172
https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/bacb7619-df71-4ea1-9e8e-a19f2b9c4279
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-144825
https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/bacb7619-df71-4ea1-9e8e-a19f2b9c4279
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3353-0
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020115972&partnerID=8YFLogxK
https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/179656773/N_ssler2018_Article_ImpactOfSurgeonExperienceOnRou.pdf
Rights: CC BY
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....9970b431fa711eb2cfb4ad73f1db0545
Database: OpenAIRE
Description
Abstract:Surgical work encompasses important aspects of personal and manual skills. In major surgery, there is a positive correlation between surgical experience and results. For pelvic organ prolapse (POP), this relationship has to our knowledge never been examined. In any clinical practice, there is always a certain proportion of inexperienced surgeons. In Sweden, most prolapse surgeons have little experience in performing prolapse operations, 74% conducting the procedure once a month or less. Simultaneously, surgery for POP globally has failure rates of 25-30%. In other words, for most surgeons, the operation is a low-frequency procedure, and outcomes are unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to clarify the acceptability of having a high proportion of low-volume surgeons in the management of POP.A group of 14,676 exclusively primary anterior or posterior repair patients was assessed. Data were analyzed by logistic regression and as a group analysis.Experienced surgeons had shorter operation times and hospital stays. Surgical experience did not affect surgical or patient-reported complication rates, organ damage, reoperation, rehospitalization, or patient satisfaction, nor did it improve patient-reported failure rates 1 year after surgery. Assistant experience, similarly, had no effect on the outcome of the operation.A management model for isolated anterior or posterior POP surgery that includes a high proportion of low-volume surgeons does not have a negative impact on the quality or outcome of anterior or posterior colporrhaphy. Consequently, the high recurrence rate was not due to insufficient experience of the surgeons performing the operation.
ISSN:14333023
09373462
DOI:10.1007/s00192-017-3353-0