Comparisons of the Retreatment Efficacy of Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin–based Sealers and Residual Sealer in Dentinal Tubules
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparisons of the Retreatment Efficacy of Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin–based Sealers and Residual Sealer in Dentinal Tubules |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Hyunsuk Kim, Euiseong Kim, Seung-Jong Lee, Su-Jung Shin |
| Contributors: | College of Dentistry, Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Hyunsuk Kim, Euiseong Kim, Seung-Jong Lee, Su-Jung Shin, Kim, Eui Seong, Shin, Su Jung, Lee, Seung Jong |
| Source: | Journal of Endodontics. 41:2025-2030 |
| Publisher Information: | Elsevier BV, 2015. |
| Publication Year: | 2015 |
| Subject Terms: | Epoxy Resins, Silicates/administration & dosage, Root Canal Obturation/methods, endodontic sealer, Electron, Root Canal Filling Materials, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Root Canal Obturation, Dentin/ultrastructure, Humans, Scanning, dentin penetration, Dental Pulp Cavity/ultrastructure, Microscopy, Calcium Compounds/administration & dosage, Microscopy, Confocal, Silicates, Smear Layer/ultrastructure, Calcium Compounds, 3. Good health, Calcium silicate, retrievability, Confocal, Smear Layer, Dentin, Retreatment, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Dental Pulp Cavity |
| Description: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the retreatment efficacy and amount of residual sealer in a single canal filled with either EndoSequence BC (Brasseler, Savannah, GA) or AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany).Canal obturation with gutta-percha and sealer was performed in 28 human teeth using the continuous wave technique. Group 1 (n = 13) used AH Plus sealer, and group 2 (n = 15) used EndoSequence BC sealer. After 7 days, the root fillings were removed using Gates Glidden drills and a nickel-titanium rotary system. Retreatment time was measured in seconds. Canal cleanliness was examined by scanning electron microscopy. The remaining debris in the canal space and penetration into dentinal tubules were evaluated by confocal microscopy. Retreatment time was compared using the Student t test, and differences in sealer penetration and remaining debris between the groups were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (P < .05).There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the amount of dentin penetration, amount of debris, or retreatment time. With respect to penetration depth, the AH Plus group showed a slightly higher percentage than the BC group, with a significant difference only in the portion 6 mm from the apex (P < .05). Scanning electron microscopic images showed significant debris remaining on canal walls in both groups, whereas canal patency in retreatment was achieved in every specimen.The present study shows that EndoSequence BC sealer and AH Plus sealer have similar efficacy in dentin penetration and retreatment efficacy. |
| Document Type: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| ISSN: | 0099-2399 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.030 |
| Access URL: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26478438 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26478438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478438 https://yonsei.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/comparisons-of-the-retreatment-efficacy-of-calcium-silicate-and-e https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239915007955 https://europepmc.org/article/MED/26478438 |
| Rights: | Elsevier TDM CC BY NC ND |
| Accession Number: | edsair.doi.dedup.....977ba0afa722314d26b213eca3e26f3b |
| Database: | OpenAIRE |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the retreatment efficacy and amount of residual sealer in a single canal filled with either EndoSequence BC (Brasseler, Savannah, GA) or AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany).Canal obturation with gutta-percha and sealer was performed in 28 human teeth using the continuous wave technique. Group 1 (n = 13) used AH Plus sealer, and group 2 (n = 15) used EndoSequence BC sealer. After 7 days, the root fillings were removed using Gates Glidden drills and a nickel-titanium rotary system. Retreatment time was measured in seconds. Canal cleanliness was examined by scanning electron microscopy. The remaining debris in the canal space and penetration into dentinal tubules were evaluated by confocal microscopy. Retreatment time was compared using the Student t test, and differences in sealer penetration and remaining debris between the groups were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (P < .05).There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the amount of dentin penetration, amount of debris, or retreatment time. With respect to penetration depth, the AH Plus group showed a slightly higher percentage than the BC group, with a significant difference only in the portion 6 mm from the apex (P < .05). Scanning electron microscopic images showed significant debris remaining on canal walls in both groups, whereas canal patency in retreatment was achieved in every specimen.The present study shows that EndoSequence BC sealer and AH Plus sealer have similar efficacy in dentin penetration and retreatment efficacy. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00992399 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.030 |