Immediate transmucosal implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 12‐month prospective multicenter cohort study

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Immediate transmucosal implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 12‐month prospective multicenter cohort study
Autoren: Cafiero C, Annibali S, Gherlone E, Grassi FR, Gualini F, Magliano A, Romeo E, Tonelli P, Lang NP, Salvi GE, ITI Study Group Italia
Weitere Verfasser: Cafiero, C, Annibali, S, Gherlone, E, Grassi, Felice Roberto, Gualini, F, Magliano, A, Romeo, E, Tonelli, P, Lang, Np, Salvi, Ge, ITI STUDY GROUP, Italia
Quelle: Clinical Oral Implants Research. 19:476-482
Verlagsinformationen: Wiley, 2008.
Publikationsjahr: 2008
Schlagwörter: Adult, Male, Time Factors, Bone Regeneration, Surface Properties, Alveolar Bone Loss, Bone Matrix, Dental Implantation, Endosseous - adverse effects - methods, Tooth Socket - surgery, Single-Tooth, Alveolar Bone Loss - etiology - radiography, Dental Prosthesis, 03 medical and health sciences, Dental Implants, Single-Tooth, 0302 clinical medicine, transmucosal healing, 80 and over, Humans, Periodontal - methods, Prospective Studies, Bone Matrix - transplantation, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods, Aged, Dental Implants, Aged, 80 and over, Postoperative Care, immediate implant, Crowns, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Extraction socket, Guided bone, Immediate implants, Regeneration (GBR), Tapered implants, Transmucosal healing, Middle Aged, Implant-Supported, Molar, 3. Good health, Radiography, Dental Implantation, Dental Prosthesis Design, Tooth Extraction, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal, Molar - surgery, Female, extraction socket, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, guided bone, immediate implants, regeneration (gbr), tapered implants, Endosseous - adverse effects - methods
Beschreibung: Aim: To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediate transmucosal placement of implants into molar extraction sockets.Study design: Twelve‐month multicenter prospective cohort study.Material and methods: Following molar extraction, tapered implants with an endosseous diameter of 4.8 mm and a shoulder diameter of 6.5 mm were immediately placed into the sockets. Molars with evidence of acute periapical pathology were excluded. After implant placement and achievement of primary stability, flaps were repositioned and sutured allowing a non‐submerged, transmucosal healing. Peri‐implant marginal defects were treated according to the principles of guided bone regeneration (GBR) by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles in conjunction with a bioresrobable collagen membrane. Standardized radiographs were obtained at baseline and 12 months thereafter. Changes in depth and width of the distance from the implant shoulder (IS) and from the alveolar crest (AC) to the bottom of the defect (BD) were assessed.Results: Eighty‐two patients (42 males and 40 females) were enrolled and followed for 12 months. They contributed with 82 tapered implants. Extraction sites displayed sufficient residual bone volume to allow primary stability of all implants. Sixty‐four percent of the implants were placed in the areas of 36 and 46. GBR was used in conjunction with the placement of all implants. No post‐surgical complications were observed. All implants healed uneventfully yielding a survival rate of 100% and healthy soft tissue conditions after 12 months. Radiographically, statistically significant changes (PConclusions: The findings of this 12‐month prospective cohort study showed that immediate transmucosal implant placement represented a predictable treatment option for the replacement of mandibular and maxillary molars lost due to reasons other than periodontitis including vertical root fractures, endodontic failures and caries.
Publikationsart: Article
Dateibeschreibung: application/msword; application/pdf
Sprache: English
ISSN: 1600-0501
0905-7161
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01541.x
Zugangs-URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18416726
http://hdl.handle.net/11588/454152
http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0905-7161&site=1
http://hdl.handle.net/11588/335426
http://hub.hku.hk/handle/10722/66521
https://boris.unibe.ch/26794/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18416726/
https://core.ac.uk/display/33055213
https://moh-it.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/immediate-transmucosal-implant-placement-in-molar-extraction-site
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01541.x
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/13674
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01541.x
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000254989200007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=0c7ff228ccbaaa74236f48834a34396a
https://hdl.handle.net/11573/67331
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01541.x
https://hdl.handle.net/11588/454152
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01541.x
http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0905-7161&site=1
https://hdl.handle.net/11588/335426
http://hdl.handle.net/10722/66521
Rights: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Dokumentencode: edsair.doi.dedup.....941be517ea186c80045ea08abbc79d6e
Datenbank: OpenAIRE
Beschreibung
Abstract:Aim: To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediate transmucosal placement of implants into molar extraction sockets.Study design: Twelve‐month multicenter prospective cohort study.Material and methods: Following molar extraction, tapered implants with an endosseous diameter of 4.8 mm and a shoulder diameter of 6.5 mm were immediately placed into the sockets. Molars with evidence of acute periapical pathology were excluded. After implant placement and achievement of primary stability, flaps were repositioned and sutured allowing a non‐submerged, transmucosal healing. Peri‐implant marginal defects were treated according to the principles of guided bone regeneration (GBR) by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles in conjunction with a bioresrobable collagen membrane. Standardized radiographs were obtained at baseline and 12 months thereafter. Changes in depth and width of the distance from the implant shoulder (IS) and from the alveolar crest (AC) to the bottom of the defect (BD) were assessed.Results: Eighty‐two patients (42 males and 40 females) were enrolled and followed for 12 months. They contributed with 82 tapered implants. Extraction sites displayed sufficient residual bone volume to allow primary stability of all implants. Sixty‐four percent of the implants were placed in the areas of 36 and 46. GBR was used in conjunction with the placement of all implants. No post‐surgical complications were observed. All implants healed uneventfully yielding a survival rate of 100% and healthy soft tissue conditions after 12 months. Radiographically, statistically significant changes (PConclusions: The findings of this 12‐month prospective cohort study showed that immediate transmucosal implant placement represented a predictable treatment option for the replacement of mandibular and maxillary molars lost due to reasons other than periodontitis including vertical root fractures, endodontic failures and caries.
ISSN:16000501
09057161
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01541.x