Struggles over epistemic capital: Complex governance objects and the making of lethal autonomous weapons systems
Gespeichert in:
| Titel: | Struggles over epistemic capital: Complex governance objects and the making of lethal autonomous weapons systems |
|---|---|
| Autoren: | Frederik Carl Windfeld |
| Quelle: | Contemporary Security Policy. :1-25 |
| Verlagsinformationen: | Informa UK Limited, 2025. |
| Publikationsjahr: | 2025 |
| Schlagwörter: | Knowledge, Epistemic cultures, Arms control, Expertise, Global governance |
| Beschreibung: | Published online: 29 April 2025 The regulation of lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS) has emerged as a salient and perplexing issue in global governance, especially in the UN GGE on LAWS. This article argues that contentions over defining and regulating LAWS extend beyond country positions. As LAWS are mobilised as a complex governance object, these disputes also stem from struggles over epistemic capital, where experts provide different interpretations of such systems’ component parts and functional properties. The article analyzes three epistemic domains—legal, technical, and military—in the academic debate over LAWS as proxies for the underlying codified capital that can be mobilized as a resource for epistemic power in the regulatory exercise. Each of the three domains offers a distinct rendering of LAWS, differing in emphasis, characterization, and assessment of regulatory prospects. The article highlights how the delineation of governance objects considered complex is a process which interpellates and reinforces epistemic authorities, thus generating political effects. |
| Publikationsart: | Article |
| Dateibeschreibung: | application/pdf |
| Sprache: | English |
| ISSN: | 1743-8764 1352-3260 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/13523260.2025.2496045 |
| Zugangs-URL: | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/92580 |
| Rights: | CC BY NC |
| Dokumentencode: | edsair.doi.dedup.....931c7e3ab344be0d46bf1845e03f5586 |
| Datenbank: | OpenAIRE |
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | Published online: 29 April 2025 The regulation of lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS) has emerged as a salient and perplexing issue in global governance, especially in the UN GGE on LAWS. This article argues that contentions over defining and regulating LAWS extend beyond country positions. As LAWS are mobilised as a complex governance object, these disputes also stem from struggles over epistemic capital, where experts provide different interpretations of such systems’ component parts and functional properties. The article analyzes three epistemic domains—legal, technical, and military—in the academic debate over LAWS as proxies for the underlying codified capital that can be mobilized as a resource for epistemic power in the regulatory exercise. Each of the three domains offers a distinct rendering of LAWS, differing in emphasis, characterization, and assessment of regulatory prospects. The article highlights how the delineation of governance objects considered complex is a process which interpellates and reinforces epistemic authorities, thus generating political effects. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 17438764 13523260 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/13523260.2025.2496045 |